I personally don't get the flavor of this card. I like that it's at least a blue impression of Pacifism effect, since the enchanted creature will rarely attack. But why elephants tho?
Legend, as for your critique, I feel like creatures need to be noticeably good at catching high-up stuff to have reach; giraffes are only good at catching high-up (stationary) leaves, they're not archers or giants or whatever. That's why they're vigilant instead of reachy.
Hey bravelion83, since you've run so many CCLs recently, do you have any things you've learned or thought about the system you might want to share? I know running a CCL is pretty daunting to some people (I did it once and didn't do that great a job) and I think it might be good to share knowledge about how to do it effectively.
To be a dissenting voice, I found this CCL to be enjoyable and challenging. It was unfamiliar for sure, but isn't that what CCL is supposed to be? We have new judges and new themes every month. We don't have a strict scoring rubric, and I for one have never been in a CCL where at least one team wasn't mostly voided by drops. Nothing weird is going on here.
The big thing is that Doombringer is testing skills the CCL does not usually test, but I hardly think that expanding the scope of the activity justifies all the grumpy posts we have been getting about it. I liked this CCL!
Maybe a more to-the-point question isn't about what you want, but rather: Do you think that would be a pleasing, fun, well-rounded Limited environment for all players?
In isolation, yeah. Without the complete context of Theros it isn't clear that Artisan of Forms is a Protean style wizard, and traditionally, creatures that change their shapes are Shapeshifters.
The big thing is that Doombringer is testing skills the CCL does not usually test, but I hardly think that expanding the scope of the activity justifies all the grumpy posts we have been getting about it. I liked this CCL!