Pretend that I'm voting you - not placing it solely to avoid accidental hammer. Hunh, wait a minute - you put me to three yourself, didn't you? Vote TerRaine.
I put you at two votes on you not three...but don't let that get in the way of making ***** up.
Terraine - Tired. Probably playing poorly but seems more like she’s trying to not get stressed and pissy over a game for once than anything else
Umami- The whole exchange about claims while I still stand by saying is a bad idea seems genuine from her end….backs off instead of getting defensive when I point out that there are flaws in her proposition. I like this
Fulcrum - The exploring roles and game play strategy comes across as towny to me. Scum always seems to thrive in chaos imo and D1 is always prime for that so this method def. brings that percentage of that down. She’s reading people’s tone on top of their actual play. Not seeing particular scum tells here and if she is well seems we’re screwed.
Osie- Jesus christ big wall is big. Start was rough for me as it felt like there was a lot of pushing for reads without much content as to the WHY of them…until there was almost all the content. Still reading through a lot of the analysis but getting town vibes from it as I go.
Tubba - Feeling kinda neutrally as type this on page two. He’s answering questions but not really putting out an feelers of his own. Correct me if wrong but don’t think he actually asked a question for the game until #124. Even then its done in an odd hedging manner there’s no teeth to it.
Sloth-God he’s ******* annoying to play against. His fixation on my first few *****posts of the game being a scum tell is weird but not sure I see it as scummy as it could easily just be an over correction after he missed me being scum in the last game we played.
I’m not a fan of the fact he just keeps downplaying as dismissing me as not doing anything. I’ve definitely been MIA but I don’t think the whole claim talk qualifies as not trying to figure out the game…and it’s not like he somehow missed me in that cause he asks me directly to clarify my thoughts on something i said during it. After I post whether it be a question for a player like in #69 (hah) or answering and playing catch up in #242 he pops up to undermine it by saying “oh she’s not doing anything to solve the game”
I find the ***** with Az weird too….he insists on finding out why there was such a strong scum read…asks twice for it and just says ok pocket me! once Az drops the vote.
His drive on me feels forced and reminds me of the Wonk game on DLP where there was a lot of activity from him like there is here…but it alway kept coming back to trying to force a lynch on me.
Azrael - Like I’ve said…the odd level of certainty in the original sloth vote and then when pressed on it, not only does he give a cop out reason but just drops it and refuses to address it again.
Find 41# that he takes up on me pressing Osie for placing so much weight on wording but looks the other way for sloth doing the same thing in 35#.
In fact for all of Sloth’s complaints that I’m not contributing solving the game I wonder where that same drive is for Az. #249 is a long post but there’s no much meat to it. Most of it seems to be a defense of his own meta and whether certain things are NAI for him. There’s little drive or push….just a lot of text and a read wall with no support.
Azrael I wanna know what you saw that was so unbelieavably scummy for sloth before his 37#. What was it in 37 that you liked enough to change your mind from that?
This isn't a real contradiction with Osie. Not even his real point. Why are you pushing it, as if it is?
I push inconsistencies and things that ping me as anti town. It’s how I scum hunt. Applying pressure when something rubs you the wrong way isn’t some outlandish gameplay.
Ter continues to not remotely try to solve the game so my vote's not changing.
Ugh honestly you can **** right off with this. I find threads that seem loose and pick and pull at them. Is it a great strategy? probably not but its the one I have.
But later on, I realized I sorta felt a lack of anything, and then there was the questioning which felt easy.
I mean…the first few pages of the game are going to usually be fluff/***** posts/easy questions. It’s how the game gets going. What exactly are you looking for?
You think that if someone claims survivalist and they live to D2, the immediate town response is to lynch them d2?
My response is to pressure them and look at them closely not just rapid fire lynch. Logic states that if town got the survivor and they claim that th witches would be remiss to not role kill them and get a town power role out of the way. The only risk scum would have here is someone fake claiming to draw the RK NK which results in no kill…but that plunges town into an ugly mess of “no no no it was a FAKE claim you see!” in D2 which would be a chaotic anti town gambit.
It seems the kind of play I would try when I first started playing thinking it clever when it really just muddies up the water.
A scum survivalist is never going to claim....it guarantees outing them as scum if they are alive d2. So basically you're asking a town survivalist to sacrifice themselves...to what end? Scum will simply rolekill them and our PR goes bye bye for no gain.
I do think you're right in the sense that we would have to have assassin claim before survivalist, but I still think it would be optimal for both to claim day 1
Again I ask though. What does Town get from giving up a power role via the survivalist?
yes if they kill anyone else N1 I don't think there's any protection roles at play but if town has a one shot BP Vest...I don't see how it helps town in anyway to tell the player who has it to announce it and take it off
Me: Sloth's play feels weird in this game and reminds me of when Sloth was scum in another game.
Also Azrael: NOT LIKE THAT!
I put you at two votes on you not three...but don't let that get in the way of making ***** up.
Umami- The whole exchange about claims while I still stand by saying is a bad idea seems genuine from her end….backs off instead of getting defensive when I point out that there are flaws in her proposition. I like this
Fulcrum - The exploring roles and game play strategy comes across as towny to me. Scum always seems to thrive in chaos imo and D1 is always prime for that so this method def. brings that percentage of that down. She’s reading people’s tone on top of their actual play. Not seeing particular scum tells here and if she is well seems we’re screwed.
Osie- Jesus christ big wall is big. Start was rough for me as it felt like there was a lot of pushing for reads without much content as to the WHY of them…until there was almost all the content. Still reading through a lot of the analysis but getting town vibes from it as I go.
Tubba - Feeling kinda neutrally as type this on page two. He’s answering questions but not really putting out an feelers of his own. Correct me if wrong but don’t think he actually asked a question for the game until #124. Even then its done in an odd hedging manner there’s no teeth to it.
Sloth-God he’s ******* annoying to play against. His fixation on my first few *****posts of the game being a scum tell is weird but not sure I see it as scummy as it could easily just be an over correction after he missed me being scum in the last game we played.
I’m not a fan of the fact he just keeps downplaying as dismissing me as not doing anything. I’ve definitely been MIA but I don’t think the whole claim talk qualifies as not trying to figure out the game…and it’s not like he somehow missed me in that cause he asks me directly to clarify my thoughts on something i said during it. After I post whether it be a question for a player like in #69 (hah) or answering and playing catch up in #242 he pops up to undermine it by saying “oh she’s not doing anything to solve the game”
I find the ***** with Az weird too….he insists on finding out why there was such a strong scum read…asks twice for it and just says ok pocket me! once Az drops the vote.
His drive on me feels forced and reminds me of the Wonk game on DLP where there was a lot of activity from him like there is here…but it alway kept coming back to trying to force a lynch on me.
Azrael - Like I’ve said…the odd level of certainty in the original sloth vote and then when pressed on it, not only does he give a cop out reason but just drops it and refuses to address it again.
Find 41# that he takes up on me pressing Osie for placing so much weight on wording but looks the other way for sloth doing the same thing in 35#.
In fact for all of Sloth’s complaints that I’m not contributing solving the game I wonder where that same drive is for Az. #249 is a long post but there’s no much meat to it. Most of it seems to be a defense of his own meta and whether certain things are NAI for him. There’s little drive or push….just a lot of text and a read wall with no support.
vote Azrael
Hard to pressure someone when they're not present. You worry about yourself
This is a cop out answer.
“Why are you reading someone this way?”
“Cause I am til I’m not”
I push inconsistencies and things that ping me as anti town. It’s how I scum hunt. Applying pressure when something rubs you the wrong way isn’t some outlandish gameplay.
Ugh honestly you can **** right off with this. I find threads that seem loose and pick and pull at them. Is it a great strategy? probably not but its the one I have.
I mean…the first few pages of the game are going to usually be fluff/***** posts/easy questions. It’s how the game gets going. What exactly are you looking for?
My response is to pressure them and look at them closely not just rapid fire lynch. Logic states that if town got the survivor and they claim that th witches would be remiss to not role kill them and get a town power role out of the way. The only risk scum would have here is someone fake claiming to draw the RK NK which results in no kill…but that plunges town into an ugly mess of “no no no it was a FAKE claim you see!” in D2 which would be a chaotic anti town gambit.
It seems the kind of play I would try when I first started playing thinking it clever when it really just muddies up the water.
We're actually kind of ********s but thank you for the compliment
Again I ask though. What does Town get from giving up a power role via the survivalist?
D1 is exactly the worst day for a survivalist to claim. It guarantees they wont make it to d2 if they're town.
I was at the top of your early town reads and now I'm null after questioning your reasons? What about my questioning felt anti town to you?
Why is someone who was not present (Umami) more of a scum read than some someone you have at least a gut read on (Az)?
Az you say feels awkward...but yet he ranks as less scummy than a player who had not yet said anything?
Your father would have to be slothfulmington II....that’s how numbers works