@Grape
What changed between #353 and now? Where are you seeing the rolefishing (at least what changed between his initial claim, and recent further elaboration)?
~~~
Also I finished the movie, and if we are going to be flavor gaming, the correct move would be to vote for none of the abilities (to not think about it at all). Not sure if that's a good idea because flavor could be NAI, and not voting might not give us information as opposed to voting. I'll think about it some more, maybe do a bit more research.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
I wanted to use him quoting a town win con verbatim and not getting moddkilled as a way to catch him as scum.(I did the same thing with Huntzilla in Big Red Button)
Why wouldn't he get modkilled as scum, though? He'd still have to quote it from somewhere. From what I've seen in past games, either town's wincon (or a vanilla rolecard) is revealed in the rules, or scum have access to it. It'd still be quoting from a PM if hypothetically it wasn't in the rules, as you initially thought.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
Weirdly as much as I disagree with everything Vez said about Highrollers Gozer plan it makes me feel better about him. I don't think that is something scum would make up to push someone. It's too paranoid.
Weirdly as much as I disagree with everything Vez said about Highrollers Gozer plan it makes me feel better about him. I don't think that is something scum would make up to push someone. It's too paranoid.
I thought his partial claim was a good look.
Who's partial claim?
Vez's - claimed that knowing flavor and role would help his ability, but flavor by itself would do, something like that. Now he'll be held accountable for it. Definitely enough incentive to leave him alone for now.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
I'm hesitant about Terry because he's proven himself to be loud as scum (Unreliable Cops), so his lack of presence seems NAI to me.
@Fuwa
I found the way High went about his mass claim proposal not really well thought out. I could be wrong and maybe tomorrow there will be a good explanation for it, but it was disorganized and when asked to explain the benefits mechanically he failed to provide an adequate answer. I don't think he's mafia though.
Elijah's honesty and nonchalant attitude feel townie but I don't know where he's pulling most of his reads out of. If tone is the towniest thing about someone, I'd argue that's a bad sign. He seems comfortable with the game state for someone who admitted his scumread wasn't great.
Why those two? Did you miss the posts where I explain why?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
And from what I've seen of Peter so far his personality certainly seems psychopathic. I haven't finished, so maybe there is some ~character development~, but Highroller's reaction to the possibility of Peter being serial killer seems over the top.
Stating facts is an "over the top" reaction? Explain this to me.
You thought it was completely out of the question that he could be serial killer. Your insistence on flavor gaming only worked in your favor, as had it worked, the accusation that you were SK would be invalidated. What facts? I'm referring to your association between flavor and alignment.
First of all, Rodemy is pretty clearly our most likely mafia suspect. Second, I've been recovering from an illness. To give you an example, I slept for like 15 hours today. I was going to go through and give my reaction to the day's events, but I haven't had the opportunity to.
I can agree with that, but that doesn't counter my point.
Feel better.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
I'm liking Riku now.
I'm kind of liking Tom, but that's probably a bad idea rn.
@Vaimes
You said earlier that you wanted to unravel Tom/Rodemy, then you said you didn't want to engage with Rodemy, then you voted Rodemy per Grape's request. I'm not getting your progression. Where are you at right now with the game?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
I wouldn't be surprised if High was serial killer. His approach to Rodemy - I get the sense he believes what he's saying, but he's extremely tunneled on him and has hardly given the rest of the players any attention. He's committed to securing a lynch, but lacks the town drive to sort the game.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
Okay, I have a plan. I know exactly what to do. Now stay close, stay close. I know. Do exactly as I say. Ready, ready, get her!
I'm actually watching the movie right now so this is hilarious.
And from what I've seen of Peter so far his personality certainly seems psychopathic. I haven't finished, so maybe there is some ~character development~, but Highroller's reaction to the possibility of Peter being serial killer seems over the top.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
I dislike your reliance on the town win condition high roller. Make an argument that isn't based on it. Town are just as likely to not read the rules as scum.
Facts! I hadn't read it either. I still haven't. I know how to play so reading the rules is generally pointless unless I believe it's going to be a super complicated game.
I'm inclined to townlean this.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
Weirdly as much as I disagree with everything Vez said about Highrollers Gozer plan it makes me feel better about him. I don't think that is something scum would make up to push someone. It's too paranoid.
I thought his partial claim was a good look.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
When the point of no return appears, it is already behind you.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Thoughts on vez's claim?
@Grape
What changed between #353 and now? Where are you seeing the rolefishing (at least what changed between his initial claim, and recent further elaboration)?
~~~
Also I finished the movie, and if we are going to be flavor gaming, the correct move would be to vote for none of the abilities (to not think about it at all). Not sure if that's a good idea because flavor could be NAI, and not voting might not give us information as opposed to voting. I'll think about it some more, maybe do a bit more research.
@Fuwa
I found the way High went about his mass claim proposal not really well thought out. I could be wrong and maybe tomorrow there will be a good explanation for it, but it was disorganized and when asked to explain the benefits mechanically he failed to provide an adequate answer. I don't think he's mafia though.
Elijah's honesty and nonchalant attitude feel townie but I don't know where he's pulling most of his reads out of. If tone is the towniest thing about someone, I'd argue that's a bad sign. He seems comfortable with the game state for someone who admitted his scumread wasn't great.
Why those two? Did you miss the posts where I explain why?
Feel better.
I'm kind of liking Tom, but that's probably a bad idea rn.
@Vaimes
You said earlier that you wanted to unravel Tom/Rodemy, then you said you didn't want to engage with Rodemy, then you voted Rodemy per Grape's request. I'm not getting your progression. Where are you at right now with the game?
And from what I've seen of Peter so far his personality certainly seems psychopathic. I haven't finished, so maybe there is some ~character development~, but Highroller's reaction to the possibility of Peter being serial killer seems over the top.