MTG Salvation

Hi card slinger, i'm planning on cashing out for a Sydri, Galvanic Genius commander deck which is as following:
Sorry for not being able to format it.
What i wonder is if it is fun to play against since it has cards card such as Mystic Remora and a alot of combos, some a bit shady such as Grand Architect + Pili-Pala for infinite mana and Sydri, Galvanic Genius + Liquimetal Coating for land destruction and Nihil Spellbomb for graveyard removal. But turning artefacts into creatures seems soo much fun, for me at least such as when blocking with a Sol Ring with death touch giving me an ever changing/ready board. So what are you guys opinion? would this be fun to play against?
Sorry if it is wrong forum. New here

My Bruna, Light of Alabaster deck started as a $50 Voltron deck. Enchantments are pretty cheap. 3 years later, it is now a $300 deck according to my deckbuilder.

Generally speaking, random people on the internet can't tell you what is fun, because our idea of fun may not align with that of your groups. That being said, "fun" decks generally don't go overboard on wraths, counterspells, and effects that stop other players from playing their own decks. They also avoid "cheap combos".

Quote from 13atman »

My Bruna, Light of Alabaster deck started as a $50 Voltron deck. Enchantments are pretty cheap. 3 years later, it is now a $300 deck according to my deckbuilder.

Not really on topic. What does that have to do with anything?

I wouldn't have any issues with it, it's less annoying than most combo-filled Sharuum lists.

Personally I would remove pili-pala as it is very much useless without the architect, and is still exceptionally vulnerable with it. There are so many other ways to make large or infinite mana and I don't really see much that could make use of the infinite mana. After all, it doesn't matter how much mana you can make if you can't do anything with it.

In my playgroups, no. Consult your own group to make sure.

Keep brewing.

Quote from cryogen »

Generally speaking, random people on the internet can't tell you what is fun, because our idea of fun may not align with that of your groups. That being said, "fun" decks generally don't go overboard on wraths, counterspells, and effects that stop other players from playing their own decks. They also avoid "cheap combos".

Quote from 13atman »

My Bruna, Light of Alabaster deck started as a $50 Voltron deck. Enchantments are pretty cheap. 3 years later, it is now a $300 deck according to my deckbuilder.

Not really on topic. What does that have to do with anything?

LOLOL, I had like 5 tabs open and I think I posted in the wrong topic, LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

People don't want to have to worry about losing to you when they can be focused on winning with their big, splashy creatures. If you want to be fun to play against, don't play anything that requires answers. I noticed you can destroy people's things. It's not fun having your things destroyed-- you might even go so far as to call it "unfun". I would consult your playgroup to see if it's okay with them. Some groups are more hardcore than others. You'd be welcome to play this against my friends and I, but we, on the whole, tend to deride the whole condemnation of "unfun board states". Fun in Magic is as much foiling your opponents' strategies as it is enacting your own.

Thanks for all the answers

Quote from cryogen »

Generally speaking, random people on the internet can't tell you what is fun, because our idea of fun may not align with that of your groups. That being said, "fun" decks generally don't go overboard on wraths, counterspells, and effects that stop other players from playing their own decks. They also avoid "cheap combos".

Sound like a good guideline.

Quote from goldnight"s blade »

I wouldn't have any issues with it, it's less annoying than most combo-filled Sharuum lists.

Personally I would remove pili-pala as it is very much useless without the architect, and is still exceptionally vulnerable with it. There are so many other ways to make large or infinite mana and I don't really see much that could make use of the infinite mana. After all, it doesn't matter how much mana you can make if you can't do anything with it.

Good to know, and i cut Pili-Pala for Kytheon, Hero of Akros since i opened it in a booster.

Quote from jclaust »

In my playgroups, no. Consult your own group to make sure.

Keep brewing.

No as in not fun to play against. Very well, thanks for the input. And i sure will keep brewing

Quote from BaronCappuccino »

People don't want to have to worry about losing to you when they can be focused on winning with their big, splashy creatures. If you want to be fun to play against, don't play anything that requires answers. I noticed you can destroy people's things. It's not fun having your things destroyed-- you might even go so far as to call it "unfun". I would consult your playgroup to see if it's okay with them. Some groups are more hardcore than others. You'd be welcome to play this against my friends and I, but we, on the whole, tend to deride the whole condemnation of "unfun board states". Fun in Magic is as much foiling your opponents' strategies as it is enacting your own.

I sense a tone of sarcasm here If i didn't have any answers or anything there needs to be answered, what's left? But a good reminder, that one should not be afraid of poking once opponents.

Thanks for the replies, appreciate it and if you have anymore to say, do so Seems like the general consent would be to ask my play group, so that is what i will do.

This would be just fine in my group. We all play some sort of combo/answer style decks. I like being able to interact with the stack and just not the board. Sometimes turning creatures sideways just doesn't cut it.