Alta Fox Capital Management LLC, which owns 2.5% of Hasbro’s stock, is sending a letter to Hasbro stockholders urging a spinoff of Wizards of the Coast, which it argues would be worth as much as all of Hasbro on its own, potentially doubling the value for Hasbro shareholders, The Wall Street Journal reports. Hasbro’s market cap is currently around $13 billion.
As a way to gain a voice for its views, Alta Fox is nominating five directors to the Hasbro board of directors; the board will be elected at the company’s annual meeting this spring.
The news comes in the wake of Hasbro’s latest earnings report, in which it revealed Wizards of the Coast’s sales had passed $1 billion for the first time, and that it sold roughly $950 million in tabletop games (Magic: The Gathering and Dungeons & Dragons) in the year (see "WotC Sold Over $950 Million in Tabletop Games in 2021"). WotC’s tabletop game sales grew at a blistering 44% rate in 2021. The division that includes WotC and digital gaming accounted for 72% of Hasbro’s operating profit for the year.
On a related matter, Clownfish TV also discussed the possibility of Hasbro selling Wizards of the Coast to Sony or Microsoft:
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
America Bless Christ Jesus
"Restriction breeds creativity." - Sheldon Menery on EDH / Commander in Magic: The Gathering
"Cancel Culture is the real reason why everyone's not allowed to have nice things anymore." - Anonymous
"For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?" - Mark 8:36
"Most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution." - Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
"Every life decision is always a risk / reward proposition." - Sanjay Gupta
It occurred to me that the best way for a bigger company to buy WotC is for them to secretly back Alt Fox in getting Hasbro to spin off WotC.
But I read ths presentation and I support spinning WotC off, Hasbro has been really parasitic towards WotC, taking profits out, but reinvesting far too little and the investiments they did make like Tuque Studios were bad choices.
Wizards of the Coast which is only worth $1 billion is only held alive being apart of a bigger company with Hasbro being worth $13 billion. If no one buys Wizards of the Coast from Hasbro then the company would go under in a matter of months while being more vulnerable to federal lawsuits tied to Paper Magic since most of their lawyers who've saved them before are mostly from Hasbro corporate. People automatically assume that If Wizards of the Coast splits with Hasbro then they'll be the same company they once were before they first partnered with them back in 1998. If anything that couldn't be further from the truth. In those days Wizards of the Coast were a much smaller company back then but unlike today they actually cared about their customers and players when it came to Magic: The Gathering and Dungeons & Dragons.
Hasbro is definitely prepping Wizards of the Coast for an evaluation which could in turn increase Hasbro value on Paper Magic however they can't afford to let go of their goose that lays golden eggs. It's arguable that the company has become too "woke" and selling it to another "woke" company would be Wizards of the Coast's demise. Hasbro wants to turn their toy business model into a small Etsy shop while they want Wizards of the Coast to become their own online video game company. They have no idea how the 90's version of itself even worked which refers to physical toys. They want to be Disney or Illumination Studios. They have absolutely no idea what they're doing really. Even the current board of directors at Hasbro haven't bought a single stock on their own company in the past decade. If that isn't a red flag with what's going on with Wizards of the Coast / Hasbro then I don't know what is.
Alta Fox Capital Management Managing Partner Connor Haley joins Yahoo Finance Live to discuss the activist investor's campaign to shake up Hasbro's board of directors and get the toy company to spin off its Wizards of the Coast segment.
Video Transcript
BRIAN SOZZI: Our next guest isn't playing games. Activist shop Alta Fox's toymaker Hasbro is, quote, "empire building without financial discipline." The firm has put forth a slate of five potential new board members to Hasbro and is pushing for a sale of the company's "Wizards of the Coast" digital property. Let's dive right in here with Alta Fox managing partner, Connor Haley. Connor, good to see you this morning. Very detailed 100-page slide deck from you on why this is the right move that Hasbro should sell off this division here. Make your case.
CONNOR HALEY: First, thanks for having me on. You know, Hasbro-- first, we love to play games. You know, we're consumers of "Magic, The Gathering." I've played for over two decades. Other people at my firm play. We love all of Hasbro's properties. And the company has tremendous potential. Unfortunately, the company has also underperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 100% over the last five years.
Look, this is a pivotal moment in Hasbro's history. Most investors still perceive and value the company as a legacy toy business, but this is really deeply flawed. The vast majority of the company's value is in their "Wizards of the Coast" segment, which is the fastest growing, highest margin, and ultimately, most valuable segment within the company. Investors are not giving the company enough credit due to poor disclosure and poor capital allocation. We believe a spin-off of this unit would create tremendous upside. We believe over 100% over the next few years.
BRIAN SOZZI: Connor, I've talked to a lot of good folks in the toy industry over the past 12 hours or so since the campaign was launched. And they all collectively say that the board members that you put forth, five of them, are not qualified to be on Hasbro's board. They really have no toy experience. Someone I spoke to highlighted that one of the names is someone who has spent a lot of time in the insurance industry, working for AIG. What do you say to that criticism?
CONNOR HALEY: I think that's a Hasbro PR slant and could not be more wrong. If you look at our nominees, first of all, we interviewed over 100 people to find five amazing candidates. And I believe we have a world class slate. I'll give you just a couple of examples of our amazing candidates. First of all, Matthew Calkins, he's the CEO and founder of multibillion dollar company, Appian. He has tremendous digital experience. He also is an award-winning game creator, having created multiple games. Has participated in the world board gaming championship successfully several times.
You have somebody like Jon Finkel. He's widely considered the greatest "Magic, The Gathering" player of all time and also has a very sharp quantitative mind, being in the finance industry. You know, who better to repair the severed goodwill over the last several years with the "Magic, The Gathering" community, which is the largest segment within their most valuable business segment, "Wizards of the Coast," than Jon Finkel?
We've got someone like Marcelo Fischer, who is the CFO of IDT, who has done a tremendous job of capital allocation and is a true spin-off expert, having overseen over five spin-offs in the last decade. We've got Rani Hublou, ex-McKinsey, deep strategy experience, also a marketing mind. We've got Carolyn Johnson, no nonsense, excellent in corporate governance, has led multiple value creation at several different companies.
We have a world class slate. To say that they don't have board game experience-- clearly flawed. To say they don't have "Wizards of the Coast" experience-- clearly flawed. To say that they haven't created value-- clearly flawed. We have an excellent board of directors nominees. And I also believe that, you know, look, they have plenty of consumer experience on the existing board. They don't have "Wizards of the Coast" experience. That's the most valuable business segment. We need incremental board members there with a refreshed perspective, given the underperformance over the last five years.
JULIE HYMAN: Connor, it's Julie here. So there's unlocking value at a division without potentially spinning it off as well. And I ask this question because looking at a "D&D" business, looking at a "Magic, The Gathering" business, like many toys and games, this stuff tends to be cyclical, right? It waxes and wanes in popularity. And I say this as amazingly as a nerd. I don't know how I haven't played "Dungeons and Dragons," but my kids certainly play "Magic, The Gathering." And so doesn't it being part of a larger organization help hedge against some of those trend changes when they do happen?
CONNOR HALEY: You know, it's a fair question, but I would disagree. You know, "Magic The Gathering" and "Dungeons and Dragons," they've been around for roughly 30 and 50 years respectively. They've seen many different economic environments. They've seen many competitors come and go. But the reality is this business segment, as a whole, has grown at a double digit revenue pattern for the last decade. And that's increased over the last three years. In the last year alone, "Wizards of the Coast" grew revenues 42% year over year with roughly 47% EBITDA margin. This is an incredible level of profitability and consistent growth.
Ultimately, what Hasbro has done with this asset is they've distracted them from investing in their core franchises. They've tasked them, for example, with creating a GI Joe AAA video game. They've tasked them with creating a Transformers card game. They've tasked them with doing these various things that have not created value that we believe will not create value. And ultimately, it's distracted them from their core players.
And the players are frustrated by it. We've received an overwhelming number of support from players, giving us ideas, saying this is the first time they've really felt their voice heard. Our nominees can really be part of positive difference here. And I think by separating "Wizards of the Coast," you can have a much more focused company with improved capital allocation and a better valuation.
BRIAN SOZZI: So Connor, where do talks stand with the company right now?
CONNOR HALEY: You know, look, we've attempted to collaborate with the company for several months leading up to this nomination. It's no coincidence we nominated right before the company deadline. We were hoping that we could still collaborate with them. And to be clear, we remain open to collaboration with the company.
But we need to first start by facing the facts. Hasbro has underperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 100% over the last five years. They are also losing significant market share to Mattel within their core consumer business. And this has accelerated over the last three years. Things are not going well, but there's tremendous opportunity. That is a case for change.
And I think the existing board needs to face the reality of the underperformance and say, what can we do to improve this? We want to support Chris Cox, the new CEO. That's a very important message. But he has a big task ahead of him. And he needs really qualified directors that better reflect the business mix of Hasbro, which includes "Wizards of the Coast" today, to help him take the company to the next level.
BRIAN SOZZI: Connor, I appreciate your passion, and clearly, you have done your work. But let's take a step back here. Have you-- how much consideration have you put into the fact that, look, one of the most respected toy executives in the industry in Brian Goldner, he just unexpectedly died. Chris Cox, he doesn't start as a new CEO until next week. Have you considered-- put consideration behind why you launch this attack now?
CONNOR HALEY: Well, first of all, this is not an attack on any individual. It's obviously extremely tragic, what happened to Brian Goldner. And this is not an attack on Chris Cox either. This is really about improving corporate governance and making sure that there is alignment between management, board, and shareholders. That has not been the case. Over the last five years, the management and board have extracted more than $180 million in compensation, while the stock has underperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 100%. OK? That is not good corporate governance.
We want to improve corporate governance. We want to align shareholders with the entire ecosystem. And ultimately, we want to support Chris Cox with highly qualified nominees. If we have the exact same strategy and the exact same board with the first-time CEO tasked with running three completely different businesses, that is a recipe for failure.
And we think Chris Cox is very qualified. We think he has a tremendous opportunity ahead of him. And we think our nominees can help him be successful. And we hope the company does the right thing for shareholders by trying to collaborate with us and finding the right path forward for this company. Because the current path over the last 10 years, it just hasn't worked, and that's just-- those are the facts. It's math, it's not an opinion.
JULIE HYMAN: Connor, we're always curious when we talk to activists to find out at what point do you sort of take it to this level, so to speak? In other words, you talk about wanting to help Chris Cox. Have you had dialogues with the company? Have they entertained some of these ideas that you have in order to change?
CONNOR HALEY: We've had a lot of dialogue with the company, their senior management and the board level. They haven't allowed us to talk to Chris Cox, despite several attempts. I think they've shielded him from us, which is unfortunate. And we're an open line. Chris Cox can call me any time. I think, frankly, we have a lot more in common. We're both Harvard guys who are strategy nerds, who love board games and strategy games, in general. I think we're actually a lot more line than he probably thinks.
But, you know, look, we tried to collaborate with them. But I think the biggest issue to date is I think the board has not acknowledged that the company has underperformed. If you read their press releases, you listen to their conference calls, they are very self-congratulatory. They love to tout how well the brand blueprint strategy is going. They love to tout continuing strong shareholder returns. The reality is they're guiding for low single digit growth in overall next year in terms of revenue and flat adjusted EBITDA.
These are very disappointing metrics. And they significantly lag rival Mattel. And this is despite the fact that they have an amazing "Wizards of the Coast" business, which is deeply undervalued inside of Hasbro. So this is a very pivotal time in Hasbro's history. Our nominees are extremely well qualified to help take it to the next level. We're an open line. If the board wants to collaborate with us, we're very open to that. However, we cannot stand idly by if the company decides to continue the exact same strategy with the same leadership and expect different results.
BRIAN SOZZI: You know, Connor, if I've learned anything from covering these activist campaigns, there's always different layers to it. And in many respects, I would say you've just fired the first shot at the company. So you have a 2 and 1/2% stake in Hasbro. Are you inclined to raise that stake even more? What's your next move here?
CONNOR HALEY: We're already a top 10 shareholder of Hasbro. I'd point out we own many multiples of the cumulative ownership stake of the current board, none of whom has bought stock in the open market in the last decade. So we think we're significantly already more aligned with shareholders. I would also point out a majority of our nominees have bought stock in the open market in the last month, which contrasts significantly with the existing board of directors.
So, look, we're very focused on driving shareholder value here. The initial reception, both from the player community, as well as shareholders, has been very positive. There's tremendous opportunity at Hasbro. We're not a scorched-earth activist. We're not trying to embarrass anyone. We're not trying to make it about any one individual. We're trying to drive positive value here, both for shareholders and all constituents.
As a player who deeply respects the "Magic, The Gathering" community and many of their other brands, it's upsetting to see, for example, Hasbro cutting the prize pool, right, for the most important "Magic, The Gathering" tournament of the year last year from a million dollars to $250,000, trying to save a de minimis $750,000. They ultimately restored the prize pool back to a million after significant backlash.
But look, the damage had already been done in terms of goodwill with their customers. These are the types of short-term moves that a large conglomerate makes. But it ultimately has long-term ramifications. Our nominees can come in and help improve the goodwill with the community, which is ultimately important to the long-term success of Hasbro.
BRIAN SOZZI: All right, let's leave it here for now. Alta Fox managing partner Connor Haley, we'll stay in touch with you. I'm sure this is just the first thing to come here in this situation.
One of the big things that stood out from this interview is that too much of Wizards of the Coast's profits were invested in other Intellectual Properties (IP's) outside of Magic and D&D however what they didn't mention was the investment in Intellectual Properties (IP's) that were acquired specifically for the sale of Secret Lair products like we saw with The Walking Dead, Stranger Things, and now Street Fighter with Warhammer 40k and Lord of the Rings soon to follow afterward which is a sign of admission that they're desperately relying on IP's outside of their own company in order to survive financially as a crutch for terrible writing in MTG lore.
As for Connor mentioning about Hasbro cutting the Paper Magic prize pool, I feel as though that was mostly in part due to the pandemic having an effect on player attendance to the point where $1 million wasn't justified unless this was for the MPL (Magic Pro League) which was exclusive to Arena and to be frank my Local Game Store (LGS) hasn't been able to fire In-Person events for Standard in the last 2 years especially due to the popularity of EDH / Commander which Wizards of the Coast / Hasbro simply refuses to provide Organized Play support for due to a war of format philosophy between casual and competitive (cEDH).
"Restriction breeds creativity." - Sheldon Menery on EDH / Commander in Magic: The Gathering
"Cancel Culture is the real reason why everyone's not allowed to have nice things anymore." - Anonymous
"For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?" - Mark 8:36
"Most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution." - Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
"Every life decision is always a risk / reward proposition." - Sanjay Gupta
"Restriction breeds creativity." - Sheldon Menery on EDH / Commander in Magic: The Gathering
"Cancel Culture is the real reason why everyone's not allowed to have nice things anymore." - Anonymous
"For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?" - Mark 8:36
"Most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution." - Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
"Every life decision is always a risk / reward proposition." - Sanjay Gupta
But I read ths presentation and I support spinning WotC off, Hasbro has been really parasitic towards WotC, taking profits out, but reinvesting far too little and the investiments they did make like Tuque Studios were bad choices.
Hasbro is definitely prepping Wizards of the Coast for an evaluation which could in turn increase Hasbro value on Paper Magic however they can't afford to let go of their goose that lays golden eggs. It's arguable that the company has become too "woke" and selling it to another "woke" company would be Wizards of the Coast's demise. Hasbro wants to turn their toy business model into a small Etsy shop while they want Wizards of the Coast to become their own online video game company. They have no idea how the 90's version of itself even worked which refers to physical toys. They want to be Disney or Illumination Studios. They have absolutely no idea what they're doing really. Even the current board of directors at Hasbro haven't bought a single stock on their own company in the past decade. If that isn't a red flag with what's going on with Wizards of the Coast / Hasbro then I don't know what is.
https://news.yahoo.com/hasbros-board-needs-face-reality-155012958.html One of the big things that stood out from this interview is that too much of Wizards of the Coast's profits were invested in other Intellectual Properties (IP's) outside of Magic and D&D however what they didn't mention was the investment in Intellectual Properties (IP's) that were acquired specifically for the sale of Secret Lair products like we saw with The Walking Dead, Stranger Things, and now Street Fighter with Warhammer 40k and Lord of the Rings soon to follow afterward which is a sign of admission that they're desperately relying on IP's outside of their own company in order to survive financially as a crutch for terrible writing in MTG lore.
As for Connor mentioning about Hasbro cutting the Paper Magic prize pool, I feel as though that was mostly in part due to the pandemic having an effect on player attendance to the point where $1 million wasn't justified unless this was for the MPL (Magic Pro League) which was exclusive to Arena and to be frank my Local Game Store (LGS) hasn't been able to fire In-Person events for Standard in the last 2 years especially due to the popularity of EDH / Commander which Wizards of the Coast / Hasbro simply refuses to provide Organized Play support for due to a war of format philosophy between casual and competitive (cEDH).
"Restriction breeds creativity." - Sheldon Menery on EDH / Commander in Magic: The Gathering
"Cancel Culture is the real reason why everyone's not allowed to have nice things anymore." - Anonymous
"For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?" - Mark 8:36
"Most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution." - Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
"Every life decision is always a risk / reward proposition." - Sanjay Gupta