Dude, you are trying way too hard. You've died on the hill, then your corpse has been dug up so you could die on it again. We get it. You think these cards could easily work in paper.
(They can't.)
Yes they can. Yes, most of them are easy (like Davriel). You can't project your personal inability to handle it to the entire mtg community, that's a bias.
You've died on the hill, then your corpse has been dug up so you could die on it again.
This is just straight nonsense ranting. Get a life instead of making delirant ranting over people's opinions.
Yes they can. Yes, most of them are easy (like Davriel). You can't project your personal inability to handle it to the entire mtg community, that's a bias.
Have you considered that people with that same personal inability might show up to a standard tournament? Sadly, tournament rules have to take the lowest common denominator into account, because tournaments have to accommodate everyone who participates. Likewise, I'm sure everyone on this forum could handle multivariable algebra and means, medians, and modes, or even trigonometry, but there's a reason Wizards doesn't use anything more complex than basic algebra. Magic is already the most complicated game in the world, it doesn't need to alienate even more people by being even more complicated. Every failed mechanic ever dreamed up could technically work in paper if you don't care about practicality, but Wizards has wisely drawn the line at things a 13 year old could reasonably be expected to do.
Please, mill me. Mill my important cards. Mill my lands. Mill it all. Because I will still deal 20 damage before you can mill 45 cards most every time.
Dude, you are trying way too hard. You've died on the hill, then your corpse has been dug up so you could die on it again. We get it. You think these cards could easily work in paper.
(They can't.)
Yes they can. Yes, most of them are easy (like Davriel). You can't project your personal inability to handle it to the entire mtg community, that's a bias.
You've died on the hill, then your corpse has been dug up so you could die on it again.
This is just straight nonsense ranting. Get a life instead of making delirant ranting over people's opinions.
You are the one not letting this go. You're ranting on each thread about these cards how they are so easy to pull off in paper. They aren't! While yes many of them may be possible to do in paper, they would take some combination of lots of words (more than can fit on a standard card), potential changes to the rules, use of paper, use of markers, use of outside materials, an objective third party observer (like a judge watching your entire game start to finish). The majority just aren't feasible in paper.
So I get it if you're mad that they are moving in this direction, plenty of reasons to not want MtG to turn digital-only. But if you think the problem is that these are designs that should be printed in paper, you really need to reconsider. Which I get you won't do now, because you've spent dozens of posts across multiple threads arguing yourself into a hole about how these are just fine paper designs.
. You're ranting on each thread about these cards how they are so easy to pull off in paper.
I am not ranting since I am obviously not the only one thinking that those cards are easily feasible, because I do not actually insult other people intelligence. Stop projecting your personal limits to all of the players base, because that's what you are doing. Sure, not everybody can handle this. But not everybody can handle many magic mechanics too (banding, layers interaction with humility, how stack and priority works, how many cards interact exactly one with each other which is why we got an entire subforum about game rules etc.), because magic is already the most complicated game in the whole world. But stop saying this isn't feasible or handleable for many, many players, just because you can't handle it, doesnt mean everybody else are just as dumb as you think they are.
Yes they can. Yes, most of them are easy (like Davriel). You can't project your personal inability to handle it to the entire mtg community, that's a bias.
This is just straight nonsense ranting. Get a life instead of making delirant ranting over people's opinions.
Have you considered that people with that same personal inability might show up to a standard tournament? Sadly, tournament rules have to take the lowest common denominator into account, because tournaments have to accommodate everyone who participates. Likewise, I'm sure everyone on this forum could handle multivariable algebra and means, medians, and modes, or even trigonometry, but there's a reason Wizards doesn't use anything more complex than basic algebra. Magic is already the most complicated game in the world, it doesn't need to alienate even more people by being even more complicated. Every failed mechanic ever dreamed up could technically work in paper if you don't care about practicality, but Wizards has wisely drawn the line at things a 13 year old could reasonably be expected to do.
You are the one not letting this go. You're ranting on each thread about these cards how they are so easy to pull off in paper. They aren't! While yes many of them may be possible to do in paper, they would take some combination of lots of words (more than can fit on a standard card), potential changes to the rules, use of paper, use of markers, use of outside materials, an objective third party observer (like a judge watching your entire game start to finish). The majority just aren't feasible in paper.
So I get it if you're mad that they are moving in this direction, plenty of reasons to not want MtG to turn digital-only. But if you think the problem is that these are designs that should be printed in paper, you really need to reconsider. Which I get you won't do now, because you've spent dozens of posts across multiple threads arguing yourself into a hole about how these are just fine paper designs.
And this is why no one likes these forums.
I am not ranting since I am obviously not the only one thinking that those cards are easily feasible, because I do not actually insult other people intelligence. Stop projecting your personal limits to all of the players base, because that's what you are doing. Sure, not everybody can handle this. But not everybody can handle many magic mechanics too (banding, layers interaction with humility, how stack and priority works, how many cards interact exactly one with each other which is why we got an entire subforum about game rules etc.), because magic is already the most complicated game in the whole world. But stop saying this isn't feasible or handleable for many, many players, just because you can't handle it, doesnt mean everybody else are just as dumb as you think they are.