1: There is a monowhite card that creates treasure.
Well creature or enchantment would be great. I hope that the card will end with CC lower than 4 for once. Most of the helping cards for white in Commander are 4CC what make it hard to justify multiple of them. 3CC would be great.
Agreed. Honestly, just having a 1/1 for WW with "ETB: create X treasures, where X is the number of opponents you have" could already help at this point, kind of a fixed version of Dockside Extortionist.
The main problem is still that all the busted cards are not white though (with the only exception being Smothering Tithe). Even if there are labelled as mistakes afterwards, the deed is done and the gap with white increased. Just give white some broken stuff as well, even as a oneshot. If white is the only one with a knife while others all have guns, just saying sorry won't help. You need to give it a gun as well so that it can compete with the others!
Calling Auraswap and Transfigure mechanic. I find it hard for them to print these in standard set, so maybe we can finally see these in a commander set I guess.
that 'payoff for cmc 10 or greater' is interesting. the fewer colors the better, I'm going to be very sad if I can't put it in a mono-green deck, just for the sheer novelty
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Project Booster Fun makes it less fun to open a booster.
that 'payoff for cmc 10 or greater' is interesting. the fewer colors the better, I'm going to be very sad if I can't put it in a mono-green deck, just for the sheer novelty
you want it in math deck GU for the biggest safety net and that’s because those are 2 of the colors for animar, soul of elements Basicly meaning it’s very very easy to trigger that card in animar decks seeing the cmc average in those decks.
I personally think it doesn't makes much sense to use such an specific and confusing wording if he just meant to say "uses a mechanic/keyword from Future Sight". Sure, he can be using this weird wording specifically to confuse people, but I think there are better ways to throw people off without using wording tricks.
I personally think it doesn't makes much sense to use such an specific and confusing wording if he just meant to say "uses a mechanic/keyword from Future Sight". Sure, he can be using this weird wording specifically to confuse people, but I think there are better ways to throw people off without using wording tricks.
It's "there are two cards that call back to the same mechanical reference as something in Future Sight." Which seems to me to imply it's something that existed before Future Sight that at least one Future Sight card referenced. Of course, that could still mean almost anything.
I personally think it doesn't makes much sense to use such an specific and confusing wording if he just meant to say "uses a mechanic/keyword from Future Sight". Sure, he can be using this weird wording specifically to confuse people, but I think there are better ways to throw people off without using wording tricks.
It's "there are two cards that call back to the same mechanical reference as something in Future Sight." Which seems to me to imply it's something that existed before Future Sight that at least one Future Sight card referenced. Of course, that could still mean almost anything.
There were a number of Spellshaper cards in Futuresight. And spellshapers would certainly be on flavor for Strixhaven.
I do like the creature ETB sadly though that would still infinite with deadeye navigator and it’s in the correct color for either Roon of the Hidden Realm and Aminatou, the Fateshifter
'buster
HR Analyst. Gamer. Activist | Fearless, and forthright | Aggro-control is a mindset.
Elspeth and Jhoira rock my world.
you want it in math deck GU for the biggest safety net and that’s because those are 2 of the colors for animar, soul of elements Basicly meaning it’s very very easy to trigger that card in animar decks seeing the cmc average in those decks.
I personally think it doesn't makes much sense to use such an specific and confusing wording if he just meant to say "uses a mechanic/keyword from Future Sight". Sure, he can be using this weird wording specifically to confuse people, but I think there are better ways to throw people off without using wording tricks.
It's "there are two cards that call back to the same mechanical reference as something in Future Sight." Which seems to me to imply it's something that existed before Future Sight that at least one Future Sight card referenced. Of course, that could still mean almost anything.
There were a number of Spellshaper cards in Futuresight. And spellshapers would certainly be on flavor for Strixhaven.
GWUBRDraft my Old Border Nostalgia Cube! and/or The Little Pauper Cube That Could!RBUWG
Modern:WDeath & TaxesW | RUGRUG DelverRUG
https://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/magic-fundamentals/the-rumor-mill/821066-stx-gavins-teasers-for-commander-decks-part-2-and
the quandrix legend almost feels like it’s gonna play like Riku of Two Reflections but excluding red.