Quote from RedGauntlet »This card represents the set's designers.
Quote from Firevine »I'm SO SICK of the "too strong for Standard" argument. It's the new "Dies to removal". We can have a two mana 4/4 with a zillion abilities, but we can't just have Accumulated Knowledge. Makes sense.
Quote from Serafiend »Quote from RedGauntlet »This card represents the set's designers.
I sometimes get the feeling this represents the current state of magic.
Quote from AnImAr_ »No one used this when it was in standard. Did anyone use this in limited? I mean seriously.
Quote from pizzap »
You don't call "dying to removal" if the removal is more expensive in resources than the creature. If you have to spend BG (Abrupt Decay), or W + basic land (PtE) to remove a 1G, that is not "dying to removal". Strictly speaking Goyf dies to removal, but actually your removal is dying to Goyf.