Barrage Tyrant 4R Creature - Eldrazi (R)
Devoid
2R Sacrifice another colorless creature: Barrage Tyrant deals damage equal to the sacrificed creature's power to target creature or player.
5/3
Quote from Wolfman about lack of Conspiracy spoilers-
"I'd say this about guarantees that it won't be up till this Friday, but considering the current track record, the ETA is now probably two weeks after the set has been out."
Quote from Sirius_B
Speak for yourself, if drawing *****-headed wurms makes social justice warriors cry I'll make it my favorite hobby.
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To the people that say that a card needs to be a higher rarity because of Limited... I hate you guys so much. I present to you with this.
The first line is obviously devoid and I'd be willing to bet he flings.
According to Google Transate the third and fourth symbols after the mana portion of the activation cost mean colorless
That same page actually posted this little guy just afterwards:
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
Yeah I know, but i'm tired of limited being an excuse for bad rares ect.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Wolfman about lack of Conspiracy spoilers-
"I'd say this about guarantees that it won't be up till this Friday, but considering the current track record, the ETA is now probably two weeks after the set has been out."
Quote from Sirius_B
Speak for yourself, if drawing *****-headed wurms makes social justice warriors cry I'll make it my favorite hobby.
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
Yeah I know, but i'm tired of limited being an excuse for bad rares ect.
...But limited is the main reason for rarity in the first place. If it weren't for that, you could have an equal chance to get any card in a pack, theoretically. (obviously, money reasons means that they probably still would keep rarity, but if the game were to begin being released NOW and didn't have a limited format)
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
Yeah I know, but i'm tired of limited being an excuse for bad rares ect.
There have always been bad rares ever since the beginning of MTG.
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
Yeah I know, but i'm tired of limited being an excuse for bad rares ect.
If you don't play Limited, "bad" rares should be totally invisible to you; the good reasons to open packs are "Limited" and "Being a store that sells singles."
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
Yeah I know, but i'm tired of limited being an excuse for bad rares ect.
If you don't play Limited, "bad" rares should be totally invisible to you; the good reasons to open packs are "Limited" and "Being a store that sells singles."
No, because it takes the spot of something that could have been good. Heck, this and that terrible vampire both could have been changed slightly and the would have been much better.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Wolfman about lack of Conspiracy spoilers-
"I'd say this about guarantees that it won't be up till this Friday, but considering the current track record, the ETA is now probably two weeks after the set has been out."
Quote from Sirius_B
Speak for yourself, if drawing *****-headed wurms makes social justice warriors cry I'll make it my favorite hobby.
Every card can be "changed slightly to be much better". Slap "Draw a card." on a random instant or sorcery and you get a "better card". Make a creature 1 mana cheaper and you get a "better card". That doesn't mean every card should be pushed to the point where it's "just powerful enough", whatever that means.
Even if limited didn't exist, there would be "bad rares" - you just can't design every rare to be about equally as powerful as all other rares. It's ridiculous to think that rares would only consist of "competitive playables" or something like that if limited wasn't a thing.
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
Yeah I know, but i'm tired of limited being an excuse for bad rares ect.
If you don't play Limited, "bad" rares should be totally invisible to you; the good reasons to open packs are "Limited" and "Being a store that sells singles."
No, because it takes the spot of something that could have been good. Heck, this and that terrible vampire both could have been changed slightly and the would have been much better.
You clearly have no clue what you are talking about...
If not for Limited all the cards would be so much better
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
Yeah I know, but i'm tired of limited being an excuse for bad rares ect.
If you don't play Limited, "bad" rares should be totally invisible to you; the good reasons to open packs are "Limited" and "Being a store that sells singles."
No, because it takes the spot of something that could have been good. Heck, this and that terrible vampire both could have been changed slightly and the would have been much better.
What "spot"? Unless you're playing Limited or cracking packs for singles (the former being a great idea, the latter only being a good idea if you're buying at wholesale and selling in volume), you won't pay for any cards you don't want.
It's not like R&D is sitting there with every rare and thinking, "Hmm, should we put a Limited/casual card with no shot at constructed, or a 'pushed-for-[format name]' card on the sheet?" They deliberately push some subset of the cards to work at various levels of constructed play. The rest are just never going to matter outside of Limited or casual play, so it doesn't make sense for you to care exactly what they look like.
Creature - Eldrazi (R)
Devoid
2R Sacrifice another colorless creature: Barrage Tyrant deals damage equal to the sacrificed creature's power to target creature or player.
5/3
Found on twitter:
https://twitter.com/mtgjp/status/637770064075231232
certainly devoid is the first line
and by the art you may pay 2R to fling some devoid creature
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Spoiler EditorHope he flings dudes (judging by the art).
Dunes of Zairo
SHANDALAR
Innistrad - The Darkest Night
~THE RAVNICAN CONSORTIUM~
A Community Set
Commander: Allies & Adversaries
"I'd say this about guarantees that it won't be up till this Friday, but considering the current track record, the ETA is now probably two weeks after the set has been out."
Quote from Sirius_B
Speak for yourself, if drawing *****-headed wurms makes social justice warriors cry I'll make it my favorite hobby.
Limited. That's why. I agree with you. For the stats and that it can't sac itself it blows. But you know... limited players will lose their minds if this was an uncommon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SY8h2vp5Xis
The first line is obviously devoid and I'd be willing to bet he flings.
According to Google Transate the third and fourth symbols after the mana portion of the activation cost mean colorless
That same page actually posted this little guy just afterwards:
I really, really like the Devoid card frames. They look really good.
RGWMayael the AnimaRGW
UBRMarchesa, the Black RoseUBR
Modern Decks
RGWNaya BurnRGW
"There are no two words in the English language more harmful than 'good job'." -Terrance Fletcher, Whiplash (2014)
Yeah I know, but i'm tired of limited being an excuse for bad rares ect.
"I'd say this about guarantees that it won't be up till this Friday, but considering the current track record, the ETA is now probably two weeks after the set has been out."
Quote from Sirius_B
Speak for yourself, if drawing *****-headed wurms makes social justice warriors cry I'll make it my favorite hobby.
...But limited is the main reason for rarity in the first place. If it weren't for that, you could have an equal chance to get any card in a pack, theoretically. (obviously, money reasons means that they probably still would keep rarity, but if the game were to begin being released NOW and didn't have a limited format)
There have always been bad rares ever since the beginning of MTG.
No, because it takes the spot of something that could have been good. Heck, this and that terrible vampire both could have been changed slightly and the would have been much better.
"I'd say this about guarantees that it won't be up till this Friday, but considering the current track record, the ETA is now probably two weeks after the set has been out."
Quote from Sirius_B
Speak for yourself, if drawing *****-headed wurms makes social justice warriors cry I'll make it my favorite hobby.
Even if limited didn't exist, there would be "bad rares" - you just can't design every rare to be about equally as powerful as all other rares. It's ridiculous to think that rares would only consist of "competitive playables" or something like that if limited wasn't a thing.
You clearly have no clue what you are talking about...
If not for Limited all the cards would be so much better
Go back to netdecking
It's not like R&D is sitting there with every rare and thinking, "Hmm, should we put a Limited/casual card with no shot at constructed, or a 'pushed-for-[format name]' card on the sheet?" They deliberately push some subset of the cards to work at various levels of constructed play. The rest are just never going to matter outside of Limited or casual play, so it doesn't make sense for you to care exactly what they look like.