Well, it looks like we are getting fetches in BFZ.
How does that make any sense?
Because Evolving Wilds is a fetchland, albeit a bad one for Constructed. Anyways, it looks like there is no artist information on the card, or at least it's cut off.
Well, it looks like we are getting fetches in BFZ.
How does that make any sense?
Because Evolving Wilds is a fetchland, albeit a bad one for Constructed. Anyways, it looks like there is no artist information on the card, or at least it's cut off.
Is that 256/274 for the card number? Or 236? Does that tell us anything really? Or is there too little data still to do any number crunching?
At first I thought 256, but that would mean that there is virtually nothing but basics after evolving wilds (there would be 2 cards somewhere in there). While there is nothing wrong with that, it doesn't seem very likely. I also think it could be 254 comparing the last digits.
However 236 means that there are at least 19 non-basic lands (including evolving wilds).
On another note 256/274 would definitely exclude enemy fetches if there are 4 lands per color.
254/274 would allow for enemy fetches to be included
Well, it looks like we are getting fetches in BFZ.
How does that make any sense?
Because Evolving Wilds is a fetchland, albeit a bad one for Constructed. Anyways, it looks like there is no artist information on the card, or at least it's cut off.
Is that 256/274 for the card number? Or 236? Does that tell us anything really? Or is there too little data still to do any number crunching?
At first I thought 256, but that would mean that there is virtually nothing but basics after evolving wilds (there would be 2 cards somewhere in there). While there is nothing wrong with that, it doesn't seem very likely. I also think it could be 254 comparing the last digits.
However 236 means that there are at least 19 non-basic lands (including evolving wilds).
On another note 256/274 would definitely exclude enemy fetches if there are 4 lands per color.
Yeah I just realized I made an error and put forest before evolving wilds. 256 cannot work with 4 lands per color. The image on Reddit is pretty clearly 236/274.
Unless we get 5 forest, plains, etc I think we are going to see at least 19 non-basics. This gives me great hope that we'll see a full set of manlands.
That's a disappointing leak... I mean, it works well with Landfall and all, but still... This card has been reprinted in Dragons of Tarkir, Origins, and even Modern Masters 2015, so three times in the past four months...
That's a disappointing leak... I mean, it works well with Landfall and all, but still... This card has been reprinted in Dragons of Tarkir, Origins, and even Modern Masters 2015, so three times in the past four months...
The spacing on the flavor text is highly suspicious. They would typically put a carriage return after the comma, not left that "but" hanging out there.
20ish nonbasic lands would be sweet. Recent sets have been sort of lacking on the good nonbasic land count, so sign me up. Makes sense with possible fetch lands and man-lands, and the whole Zendikar-land flavor. Can't wait for spoiler season to start!
It's a fine limited card for sets that can't waste a ton of spots on common duals. Seriously, it's better than shimmering grotto or rupture spire unless you're going nuts on the colors in the set. Yeah, it would make 4 sets in a row, but it's a valueless limited common. Why reinvent the wheel when wilds is already good?
Of course it's also decent budget fixing that should now have nearly unlimited copies out there for every deck you want 4 for. Now I'd personally like it to be functionally reprinted a few more times since I'd like 4 in casual 5 color commander where etbt is OK because the game doesn't start for a while.
Anyone think of the possibility that there could only be 14 non-basics? Remember the thing about the colorless basic they were working on. We could see 6 basic types at 4 each for 24 basics leaving 14 non-basics after evolving wilds.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
RGWMayael the AnimaRGW
UBRMarchesa, the Black RoseUBR
Modern Decks
RGWNaya BurnRGW
EDH:
Pauper:
How does that make any sense?
Because Evolving Wilds is a fetchland, albeit a bad one for Constructed. Anyways, it looks like there is no artist information on the card, or at least it's cut off.
RGWMayael the AnimaRGW
UBRMarchesa, the Black RoseUBR
Modern Decks
RGWNaya BurnRGW
The bottom border looks legit, although I can't make out the artist's name
EDH:
Pauper:
It looks like Izzy to me
At first I thought 256, but that would mean that there is virtually nothing but basics after evolving wilds (there would be 2 cards somewhere in there). While there is nothing wrong with that, it doesn't seem very likely. I also think it could be 254 comparing the last digits.
However 236 means that there are at least 19 non-basic lands (including evolving wilds).
On another note 256/274 would definitely exclude enemy fetches if there are 4 lands per color.
254/274 would allow for enemy fetches to be included
I see 236/274.
Unless we get 5 forest, plains, etc I think we are going to see at least 19 non-basics. This gives me great hope that we'll see a full set of manlands.
And the number is definitely 236, you can see it more clearly on the larger picture:
http://i.imgur.com/gLJ1IuR.jpg
And M15.
If it's 236, that means we're looking at 18 lands after Evolving Wilds? Sign me up!
UR Blue-Red Control
Modern:
UBR Grixis Control
UWR Jeskai Control
It might be the hundreth consecutive reprint of it, but it fits in so nicely with the land(fall) theme
This is what I was wondering as well. Why is it so beat up?
well, i guess the leak was planted so maybe its to reflect zendikar condition itself.
That or someone didn't notice this Evolving Wilds had a different set icon and just didn't care about it until they noticed.
Sweet art if it's real, but I agree with the sentiment that reprinting this card this frequently just seems odd.
Of course it's also decent budget fixing that should now have nearly unlimited copies out there for every deck you want 4 for. Now I'd personally like it to be functionally reprinted a few more times since I'd like 4 in casual 5 color commander where etbt is OK because the game doesn't start for a while.