Is the name "Sword of War and Peach" confirmed? I was thinking that if Action is Mirrodin Pure, that the white might be "Purity"... and reading some older flavour text (on a Serra card?), I thought maybe "Purity and Fury" or "Purity and Flame", or something along those lines. In order to be consistent with the rest of the "cycle", it certainly won't have "Fire" or "Light" in the name.
Pury and Furity?
Srsly though, along the same line as Emocakes, Red = Destroy Artifact, White = Destroy Enchantment? Obv may abilities. Or white chould be something like razor hippogriff, but I'm thinking destro.
And Sword of Pury and Furity. BAJANGO!
Edit: What are Sarnarth?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Thanks, to Zaphod for the m4d sig and and to Fatal GFX for the wicked avvy!
I think destroy target artifact and/or enchantment wouldn't fit the style of the swords. They all have 2 separate effects representing one color each. Also, destroying enchantments doesn't really seem to fit "Peace". Also, pretty strong effect there. That's why I suggested crush instead of shatter.
Side note: Tempest's post is sooo gonna get deleted.
I have heard vague rumors of a moustache-dispensing vending machine in a distant laundromat, across the street from a tattoo parlor. However, this information is shaky, and time is of the essence.
For people saying that "destroy target enchantment" isn't peace-y enough, just think of other cards that wipe enchantments. Tranquility, Calming Verse, Cleansing Meditation, etc.
Or it's a golem's arm. They are still around, and many of them presumably still fighting for the mirrans...
I could accept that, but the guy right behind the arm definately looks like a human with a machine arm. To me, the background looks like a combined army of golems and augmented Mirrans perparing for battle.
I've got it! In the process of the war, the Mirrans will become machine hybrids, defeat the new phyrexians, but turn Mirrodin into their own Phyrexia! The mirrans will win, but the set will be New Phyrexia. I am obviously joking.
Thank God. Blinding Angel was a miserable card to play against.
Sometime that ended the game right there; back in those days, Brainstorm, Counterspell, Fact or Fiction, Misdirection, etc were all Standard. You could cast Blinding Angel and ride her all the way to victory while your opponent's ground forces sat there and you countered all of their Angel removal.
And now the infractions have started. Guys, if you want to speculate intelligently, there's a forum for that.
Im confused as to what you expect people to talk about. Since you have no information besides the name and the art, you have 3 options:
1. Discuss your opinion of the art
2. Discuss your opinion of the name 3. Discuss your opinion of what the card may do
So I guess the art is pretty and the name is exciting! Yes, I love discussions!
Oh no! Ive commited thought-crime. Big Brother will not be pleased.
Im confused as to what you expect people to talk about. Since you have no information besides the name and the art, you have 3 options:
1. Discuss your opinion of the art
2. Discuss your opinion of the name 3. Discuss your opinion of what the card may do
So I guess the art is pretty and the name is exciting! Yes, I love discussions!
Oh no! Ive commited thought-crime. Big Brother will not be pleased.
LMFAO, yes. i concur the name and the picture are pretty intense, but i wonder what the card might do, it- oops...
Equipped creature gets +2/+2 and has protection from red and white.
Whenever equipped creature deals damage to a player, defending player sacrifice a land and untap all tapped creature you control
Equip (2)
yeah......
At this point, I've warned the thread three times to take the speculation to a more appropriate forum. Probably not a good idea to heed none of those warnings.
Currently Running: WRGRWMayael of the Anima (N00b Deck) WBGBWGhave, Guru of Spores URBRUSedris, the Traitor King (Unearth Goodies) Working on: WUBUWMerieke Ri Berit (Tapalicious)
Quote from Super Commander Spoiler! »
Vow of Celibacy2W
Enchantment - Aura
Enchant Creature
Enchanted creature gets +2/+2, has Defender, and can’t @#$% you or a planeswalker you control.
"Now that's a turn off."
- Gwendlyn Di Corci
Im confused as to what you expect people to talk about. Since you have no information besides the name and the art, you have 3 options:
1. Discuss your opinion of the art
2. Discuss your opinion of the name 3. Discuss your opinion of what the card may do
Yeah, exactly. We don't even like baseless speculation (guesses with no real reason or backing) in the Speculation forum, it's far more unacceptable here. So yes, when all we have is art and a name, commenting on that is all we can really do here. Which is fine, not every thread needs to be 20 pages of discussion. Sometimes a small nugget of info only results in a short thread. There's no requirement that everyone need to post in every thread. If you don't have much to say, you don't actually have to post. Though a lot of posters have a strange sense of entitlement where they feel they can decide what ought to be allowed in a thread so they can +1 a post, the reality isn't exactly so.
So I guess the art is pretty and the name is exciting! Yes, I love discussions!
Ah yes, bitter sarcasm. Super constructive.
Oh no! Ive commited thought-crime. Big Brother will not be pleased.
Well there's a constructive attitude! And not at all hyperbolic entitlement with a splash of butthurt immaturity.
It's really not that serious, so gear down. Just trying to do my best to keep things orderly. Speculation where it belongs and all. It's not my fault if posters don't read my three in-thread warnings and wind up in trouble for it. I mean, I think waiting to infract at all until after two rounds of general thread warnings is ridiculously reasonable. At some point, the gloves do need to come off.
as for thinking people just say things to get +1 posts, thats a tad unfair. you could reset my post count daily and i wouldent care, maybe to some people post counts are a sense of entiltlement. But thats also being said without any real proof, or should i say "baseless speculation"
The art is nice. My opinion will be kept silent until I am in the appropriate forum...
But also note, this is the rumor mill. New card discussion is good for talking about new cards. Once we are given information about the card, we go on to talk about its effects on the game. Sure, we have the art, but no other info about the card itself. All speculation at this point is a rumor. We talk about what the card might be/do and not actual speculation of the actual card...
I have to say this is my least favorite art of the swords; I love the contrast between blades of all of the others.
Regardless of the ability, the evasion on this one will be make it equal to SaFaf in price at least.
I have to say this is my least favorite art of the swords; I love the contrast between blades of all of the others.
Regardless of the ability, the evasion on this one will be make it equal to SaFaf in price at least.
That's what was bothering me about it. I couldn't figure it out, but now I see it. The colors of the blades are way too similar. Thank you!
looks sweet, looking forward to seeing what it does. now that they're finishing up the fifth sword I'm beginning to wonder how they'll get to the next five.
Pury and Furity?
Srsly though, along the same line as Emocakes, Red = Destroy Artifact, White = Destroy Enchantment? Obv may abilities. Or white chould be something like razor hippogriff, but I'm thinking destro.
And Sword of Pury and Furity. BAJANGO!
Edit: What are Sarnarth?
Thanks, to Zaphod for the m4d sig and and to Fatal GFX for the wicked avvy!
It's a trade thread!
:symb::symbr:Project Rakdos Deck Wins.dec:symrb::symr:
Side note: Tempest's post is sooo gonna get deleted.
Sig & Avvy by Disappointing Signets Inc.
CCC&G BRAGGING RIGHTS
Mafia Statistics
I collect pacifism: 228
GWB Junk Stax Ghave BWG
If you can't beat them, join them! Wait a minute...
I could accept that, but the guy right behind the arm definately looks like a human with a machine arm. To me, the background looks like a combined army of golems and augmented Mirrans perparing for battle.
I've got it! In the process of the war, the Mirrans will become machine hybrids, defeat the new phyrexians, but turn Mirrodin into their own Phyrexia! The mirrans will win, but the set will be New Phyrexia. I am obviously joking.
Archatmos
Excellion
Fracture: Israfiel (WBR), Wujal (URG), Valedon (GUB), Amduat (BGW), Paladris (RWU)
Collision (Set Two of the Fracture Block)
Quest for the Forsaken (Set Two of the Excellion Block)
Katingal: Plane of Chains
Make that sword, play a game with it, and then realize how stupidly powerful that would be.
My twitter account: @Kengy5
My blog about cube:
Slaughter Cry
Thank God. Blinding Angel was a miserable card to play against.
Sometime that ended the game right there; back in those days, Brainstorm, Counterspell, Fact or Fiction, Misdirection, etc were all Standard. You could cast Blinding Angel and ride her all the way to victory while your opponent's ground forces sat there and you countered all of their Angel removal.
Im confused as to what you expect people to talk about. Since you have no information besides the name and the art, you have 3 options:
1. Discuss your opinion of the art
2. Discuss your opinion of the name
3. Discuss your opinion of what the card may doSo I guess the art is pretty and the name is exciting! Yes, I love discussions!
Oh no! Ive commited thought-crime. Big Brother will not be pleased.
LMFAO, yes. i concur the name and the picture are pretty intense, but i wonder what the card might do, it- oops...
Equipped creature gets +2/+2 and has protection from red and white.
Whenever equipped creature deals damage to a player, defending player sacrifice a land and untap all tapped creature you control
Equip (2)
yeah......
At this point, I've warned the thread three times to take the speculation to a more appropriate forum. Probably not a good idea to heed none of those warnings.
Infraction Issued
EDH: Xenagos, God of Revels.
@GouGou means you.
Warning for Backseat Moderation
WRGRWMayael of the Anima (N00b Deck)
WBGBWGhave, Guru of Spores
URBRUSedris, the Traitor King (Unearth Goodies)
Working on:
WUBUWMerieke Ri Berit (Tapalicious)
Yeah, exactly. We don't even like baseless speculation (guesses with no real reason or backing) in the Speculation forum, it's far more unacceptable here. So yes, when all we have is art and a name, commenting on that is all we can really do here. Which is fine, not every thread needs to be 20 pages of discussion. Sometimes a small nugget of info only results in a short thread. There's no requirement that everyone need to post in every thread. If you don't have much to say, you don't actually have to post. Though a lot of posters have a strange sense of entitlement where they feel they can decide what ought to be allowed in a thread so they can +1 a post, the reality isn't exactly so.
Ah yes, bitter sarcasm. Super constructive.
Well there's a constructive attitude! And not at all hyperbolic entitlement with a splash of butthurt immaturity.
It's really not that serious, so gear down. Just trying to do my best to keep things orderly. Speculation where it belongs and all. It's not my fault if posters don't read my three in-thread warnings and wind up in trouble for it. I mean, I think waiting to infract at all until after two rounds of general thread warnings is ridiculously reasonable. At some point, the gloves do need to come off.
Archatmos
Excellion
Fracture: Israfiel (WBR), Wujal (URG), Valedon (GUB), Amduat (BGW), Paladris (RWU)
Collision (Set Two of the Fracture Block)
Quest for the Forsaken (Set Two of the Excellion Block)
Katingal: Plane of Chains
as for thinking people just say things to get +1 posts, thats a tad unfair. you could reset my post count daily and i wouldent care, maybe to some people post counts are a sense of entiltlement. But thats also being said without any real proof, or should i say "baseless speculation"
The art is nice. My opinion will be kept silent until I am in the appropriate forum...
But also note, this is the rumor mill. New card discussion is good for talking about new cards. Once we are given information about the card, we go on to talk about its effects on the game. Sure, we have the art, but no other info about the card itself. All speculation at this point is a rumor. We talk about what the card might be/do and not actual speculation of the actual card...
Art looks awesome, best of all the cycle for me. Name matches the epicness. For the record, no sarcasm.
Regardless of the ability, the evasion on this one will be make it equal to SaFaf in price at least.
That's what was bothering me about it. I couldn't figure it out, but now I see it. The colors of the blades are way too similar. Thank you!
Standard:
UBU/B TezzeretBU
WWW QuestW
RMetal GoblinsR
Legacy:
UCounterTopU
thanks to DarkNightCavalier at Heros of the Plane for the sig
UBU/B Tezz ControlUB
WTempered SteelW
EDH
BWTeysa, Orzhov ScionBW
RUJhoira of the GhituRU
RGWMayael the AnimaRGW