This card+ the other black ravnica invitational card+(optional)senseis top=owned :dance2:
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Marce »
clergy en-vec read the flavor text prior to looking at the picture...much worse then boros guildmage
______zyrakris's gemstone caverns thread \/\/\/
Quote from ElementalCreatureToken »
Quote from SqueektheWeek »
i think this card is Freakin' awesome just imagine zoo with this even on the draw u flex "Nutz" any mana drawing the extra card u can pitch and turning up the gas on tempo and it still taps for mana easily a 3 of most likely a 4 of
Can somebody translate that please?
Quote from darkhammy »
Hang on, I need my gibber-to-english dictionary. Ah yes, here it is,
I actually think this card is UNDERpowered. You coercion yourself to do it to your opponent on a slim 2/2 body? It seems really balanced, but kinda 'meh' when you compare it to Meddling Pikula, Prof. LD, Robo-Jens, and Finkle. I'd also hate to be drawn as a zombie.
I think samstod has a point. The idea is to reveal your hand and let your opponent choose when there is no timeframe for he/she to respond with anything.
If it's part of the cost, your opponent gets a chance to respond with maybe that card you're trying to remove and still gets to see your hand.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from DoucheWaffle »
am i the only one refreshing magic websites while looking at porn and eating fruit loops at 2 in the morning?...i feel so alone...
......WTF????....... I don't even know what kind of warning you deserve for this....
an upkeep trigger is much better than a 0 activation cost that can only be played once a turn. They could still make the ability optional, or they could weaken the card by making it not optional. If they weaken it, I think it will be done by making the ability not optional. However, I see nothing wrong with the ability as is, I find it very balanced and playable.
This card is pretty hot. I would love to see it printed as is, but I'm sure we'll see at least a little tweaking done to the ability's cost. I hope no mana costs are increased though.
Oh, and Mantra, Megrim isn't exactly the basis for judging good discard cards.
It seems pretty balanced to me, after all your trading a card of your opponents choice in your hand for a card of your choice in their hand and with it already being sorcery speed and already being limited to 1 activation a turn i personally can't see any reason wizards should change this.
The only thing that might change is the type to fit better into the set its printed in(like voidmage was originally an enchantment and solemn was originally an elf wizard). I suppose they also might change the ability to incorporate a block theme.
______zyrakris's gemstone caverns thread \/\/\/
Buy from me on TCGPlayer::Twitter::Flickr
If it's part of the cost, your opponent gets a chance to respond with maybe that card you're trying to remove and still gets to see your hand.
<Qzilla> losing to girls at magic is such a high
Owner of IcyGeek.com
Owner of IcyGeek.com
Oh well, this might be good. I wish it were coming out in time to help the current standard's fight against control.
As written, no. The "if you do" clause kills it.
I have no extendo-sig. Sorry, I'm just not vain enough to think someone will click on it.
Oh, and Mantra, Megrim isn't exactly the basis for judging good discard cards.
The only thing that might change is the type to fit better into the set its printed in(like voidmage was originally an enchantment and solemn was originally an elf wizard). I suppose they also might change the ability to incorporate a block theme.
Machius proudly supports R_E's right to Rumour!