It may be not mtg related, but modern guns do have a problem with work of fiction based on wizards. The issue is you want to show powerful wizard casting spell and engaging in magical duels and guns prevent that. How? They simply are too powerful, while your fire mage is channeling his power to cast the spell, your average guy have already shot him in the face.
Older gun would mitigate this problem. Another way is build your world with guns in mind, but in a work of fiction like magic this won't work because you have a recurring cast that is not designed with guns in mind. Sure Nissa's elementals are strong, but the cowboy with the revolver would still easily kill the elf.
Star Wars and the Matrix seem to examples refuting your point of guns not mixing with magic
It may be not mtg related, but modern guns do have a problem with work of fiction based on wizards. The issue is you want to show powerful wizard casting spell and engaging in magical duels and guns prevent that. How? They simply are too powerful, while your fire mage is channeling his power to cast the spell, your average guy have already shot him in the face.
Older gun would mitigate this problem. Another way is build your world with guns in mind, but in a work of fiction like magic this won't work because you have a recurring cast that is not designed with guns in mind. Sure Nissa's elementals are strong, but the cowboy with the revolver would still easily kill the elf.
Star Wars and the Matrix seem to examples refuting your point of guns not mixing with magic
How broadly are you defining magic? Because I sure as heck wouldn't consider either Star Wars or the Matrix as having magic. Though I also don't consider Star Wars as having guns so my definitions may be skewed.
Apparently people are obsessing about guns. I just thought I'd point out that guns exist on Innistrad. This proves that guns can be present in the art without being any kind of focus.
It may be not mtg related, but modern guns do have a problem with work of fiction based on wizards. The issue is you want to show powerful wizard casting spell and engaging in magical duels and guns prevent that. How? They simply are too powerful, while your fire mage is channeling his power to cast the spell, your average guy have already shot him in the face.
Older gun would mitigate this problem. Another way is build your world with guns in mind, but in a work of fiction like magic this won't work because you have a recurring cast that is not designed with guns in mind. Sure Nissa's elementals are strong, but the cowboy with the revolver would still easily kill the elf.
Star Wars and the Matrix seem to examples refuting your point of guns not mixing with magic
How broadly are you defining magic? Because I sure as heck wouldn't consider either Star Wars or the Matrix as having magic. Though I also don't consider Star Wars as having guns so my definitions may be skewed.
If "The Force" isn't a magical entity then I am not sure what would ever be considered magical. Again, with the Matrix, Neo's ability to stop bullets mid-air is pretty magical. They're different interpretations of magic but I don't know how you would define them without using a convoluted argument of semantics as they're both examples of supernatural powers.
Apparently people are obsessing about guns. I just thought I'd point out that guns exist on Innistrad. This proves that guns can be present in the art without being any kind of focus.
It may be not mtg related, but modern guns do have a problem with work of fiction based on wizards. The issue is you want to show powerful wizard casting spell and engaging in magical duels and guns prevent that. How? They simply are too powerful, while your fire mage is channeling his power to cast the spell, your average guy have already shot him in the face.
Older gun would mitigate this problem. Another way is build your world with guns in mind, but in a work of fiction like magic this won't work because you have a recurring cast that is not designed with guns in mind. Sure Nissa's elementals are strong, but the cowboy with the revolver would still easily kill the elf.
Star Wars and the Matrix seem to examples refuting your point of guns not mixing with magic
How broadly are you defining magic? Because I sure as heck wouldn't consider either Star Wars or the Matrix as having magic. Though I also don't consider Star Wars as having guns so my definitions may be skewed.
If "The Force" isn't a magical entity then I am not sure what would ever be considered magical. Again, with the Matrix, Neo's ability to stop bullets mid-air is pretty magical. They're different interpretations of magic but I don't know how you would define them without using a convoluted argument of semantics as they're both examples of supernatural powers.
There is an argument for the force being magic(are espers magic?), but Neo is literally hacking a computer program; which is about as nonmagic as possible.
Apparently people are obsessing about guns. I just thought I'd point out that guns exist on Innistrad. This proves that guns can be present in the art without being any kind of focus.
Just because you think something is a gun doesn't mean it is a gun. There are no guns on Innistrad. There are hand held projectile weapons, but they are crossbows.
It may be not mtg related, but modern guns do have a problem with work of fiction based on wizards. The issue is you want to show powerful wizard casting spell and engaging in magical duels and guns prevent that. How? They simply are too powerful, while your fire mage is channeling his power to cast the spell, your average guy have already shot him in the face.
Older gun would mitigate this problem. Another way is build your world with guns in mind, but in a work of fiction like magic this won't work because you have a recurring cast that is not designed with guns in mind. Sure Nissa's elementals are strong, but the cowboy with the revolver would still easily kill the elf.
Star Wars and the Matrix seem to examples refuting your point of guns not mixing with magic
How broadly are you defining magic? Because I sure as heck wouldn't consider either Star Wars or the Matrix as having magic. Though I also don't consider Star Wars as having guns so my definitions may be skewed.
If "The Force" isn't a magical entity then I am not sure what would ever be considered magical. Again, with the Matrix, Neo's ability to stop bullets mid-air is pretty magical. They're different interpretations of magic but I don't know how you would define them without using a convoluted argument of semantics as they're both examples of supernatural powers.
There is an argument for the force being magic(are espers magic?), but Neo is literally hacking a computer program; which is about as nonmagic as possible.
Pretty far off topic at this point...but Neo's abilities eventually extend outside of the confines of the Matrix. Maybe you're not considering that portion of the series since most people think the movies totally lost their way - I can buy that. But I was just using that scene as an example because it showed "magical" abilities and the ability was used to stop bullets - referencing the argument posted further up for why magic and guns couldn't coexist. Clearly, it was a pretty bad example though since in that scene he was within the matrix and you're absolutely right - he was just hacking it.
Again, apologies for letting this runaway train go so far
Star Wars and the Matrix seem to examples refuting your point of guns not mixing with magic
How broadly are you defining magic? Because I sure as heck wouldn't consider either Star Wars or the Matrix as having magic. Though I also don't consider Star Wars as having guns so my definitions may be skewed.
If "The Force" isn't a magical entity then I am not sure what would ever be considered magical. Again, with the Matrix, Neo's ability to stop bullets mid-air is pretty magical. They're different interpretations of magic but I don't know how you would define them without using a convoluted argument of semantics as they're both examples of supernatural powers.
There is an argument for the force being magic(are espers magic?), but Neo is literally hacking a computer program; which is about as nonmagic as possible.
Pretty far off topic at this point...but Neo's abilities eventually extend outside of the confines of the Matrix. Maybe you're not considering that portion of the series since most people think the movies totally lost their way - I can buy that. But I was just using that scene as an example because it showed "magical" abilities and the ability was used to stop bullets - referencing the argument posted further up for why magic and guns couldn't coexist. Clearly, it was a pretty bad example though since in that scene he was within the matrix and you're absolutely right - he was just hacking it.
Again, apologies for letting this runaway train go so far
Continuing the off topic, I actually belive the theory that even the 'outside' world was part of the Matrix which is why he still had powers. It's an interesting theory that has a shocking amount if evidence, but either way it's still hacking computers, not magic.
Back on topic, the original point being made was you can't 'add' guns to a fantasy setting because it's screws with power balance. They specifically said you could design a fantasy world with guns you would simply need to build in foils to the guns. Star wars had their 'bullets' being slow and deflectable, so rather than being a strength they were a liability. In the Matrix the bad guys could simply move fast enough to dodge bullets and Neo had his hax.
MTG has no safe guard against fire arms. Spell casting is usually slow, exceptions vary. In the time it would take Jace to conjure an illusion or Chandra a fireball you could easily empty the clip of modern day guns, or even wild west style revolvers. They could go the usually used horrible route of nobody can aim, or even actively aims away from people but that is annoying as heck. In a more accurate example of guns and magic, the Dresden Files, they make a point that while offensive magic may have travel time it is launched at the speed of thought so defenses can be raised instantly.
I don't see what all this fussing about Innistrad is. There's at least one other continent to explore with elves and non-lupine lycanthropes. And they havent even touched the story of the UBR skeleton, horror lord who stumbled through a suspiciously tree shaped planar portal and found himself on a snow covered mountain overlooking a city of industrious elves ruled over by a jovial WR giant. Lets stop whining about the past and look forward to the future.
I don't see what all this fussing about Innistrad is. There's at least one other continent to explore with elves and non-lupine lycanthropes. And they havent even touched the story of the UBR skeleton, horror lord who stumbled through a suspiciously tree shaped planar portal and found himself on a snow covered mountain overlooking a city of industrious elves ruled over by a jovial WR giant. Lets stop whining about the past and look forward to the future.
Yo what? Where is this ever referenced? I NEED
I, err, I'm pretty sure the whole last half of that post was just a reference to the Nightmare Before Christmas...???
The additional continent, and the elves I think, were mentioned/hinted at having actually existed though??? Maybe? It sounds familiar anyhow.
I don't see what all this fussing about Innistrad is. There's at least one other continent to explore with elves and non-lupine lycanthropes. And they havent even touched the story of the UBR skeleton, horror lord who stumbled through a suspiciously tree shaped planar portal and found himself on a snow covered mountain overlooking a city of industrious elves ruled over by a jovial WR giant. Lets stop whining about the past and look forward to the future.
Yo what? Where is this ever referenced? I NEED
I, err, I'm pretty sure the whole last half of that post was just a reference to the Nightmare Before Christmas...???
The additional continent, and the elves I think, were mentioned/hinted at having actually existed though??? Maybe? It sounds familiar anyhow.
They mentioned the elves of Innistrad at some point, here is the quote from our wiki:
"According to the creative team, Elves were once present on Innistrad, but were driven to extinction."
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
.
Thanks to DarkNightCavalier from Heroes of the Plane Studios for this sick Signature.
I don't see what all this fussing about Innistrad is. There's at least one other continent to explore with elves and non-lupine lycanthropes. And they havent even touched the story of the UBR skeleton, horror lord who stumbled through a suspiciously tree shaped planar portal and found himself on a snow covered mountain overlooking a city of industrious elves ruled over by a jovial WR giant. Lets stop whining about the past and look forward to the future.
Yo what? Where is this ever referenced? I NEED
I, err, I'm pretty sure the whole last half of that post was just a reference to the Nightmare Before Christmas...???
The additional continent, and the elves I think, were mentioned/hinted at having actually existed though??? Maybe? It sounds familiar anyhow.
IIRC it Brady on the old wizard forum said it was a working idea for the werewolf curse, it was from elves being killed off and while it could be canon, it seems like it never truly confirmed? Its Schrödinger's canon. Much how we knew Avacyn was very robotic acting, before the current creative team pinned down her personality.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
“There are no weak Jews. I am descended from those who wrestle angels and kill giants. We were chosen by God. You were chosen by a pathetic little man who can't seem to grow a full mustache"
"You can tell how dumb someone is by how they use Mary Sue"
Looks like the Vampires are a take on conquistadors/missionaries?
Yes its a bit on the nose honestly and I am sure they will represent the Aztecs accurately, including blood sacrifice, raiding their neighbors to gain more slaves to sacrifice, and said neighbors siding with the conquistadors against the aztecs.
Also the Warhammer universe has guns and tanks even.
Looks like the Vampires are a take on conquistadors/missionaries?
Yes its a bit on the nose honestly and I am sure they will represent the Aztecs accurately, including blood sacrifice, raiding their neighbors to gain more slaves to sacrifice, and said neighbors siding with the conquistadors against the aztecs.
Also the Warhammer universe has guns and tanks even.
While I agree that Vampires as conquistador/missionary metaphors are a bit on the nose, the Aztecs weren't the only mesoamerican culture the Spanish conquered. Ixalan could be taking more inspiration from the Maya civilisation instead for example. Either way, no one is denying that the Aztecs had a very brutal culture. Since Ixalan is probably NOT supposed to be an exact metaphor for the exact conflict between the conquistadors and the Aztecs though (I'm pretty sure I would remember Aztecs riding on dinosaurs for example) I fail to see your point.
Also, as has been discussed quite a bit on multiple threads here, Wizards has been very rigorous about not using fire arms (at least not non-magical ones) in MtG. Magical ones like in Kaladesh (which arguably also featured tanks and mecha) are fine though.
While I agree that Vampires as conquistador/missionary metaphors are a bit on the nose, the Aztecs weren't the only mesoamerican culture the Spanish conquered. Ixalan could be taking more inspiration from the Maya civilisation instead for example. Either way, no one is denying that the Aztecs had a very brutal culture. Since Ixalan is probably NOT supposed to be an exact metaphor for the exact conflict between the conquistadors and the Aztecs though (I'm pretty sure I would remember Aztecs riding on dinosaurs for example) I fail to see your point.
You admit that the depiction is a bit on the nose, then fail to see a point in wondering if the natives are going to be depicted accurately?
Also, as has been discussed quite a bit on multiple threads here, Wizards has been very rigorous about not using fire arms (at least not non-magical ones) in MtG. Magical ones like in Kaladesh (which arguably also featured tanks and mecha) are fine though.
Anything that has loading time, honestly, is fine. It just has to match the idea of "can we feasibly show a mage fighting against this?" So energy-charge weapons that take a bit to fire and/or have slower velocities or flintlocks, etc. could easily work. Six-shooters could work as magical-focus objects working on mana reserves and said people could take several hits, like they do with arrows and such already. Its just a matter of worldbuilding, where something like a full-auto obviously is out of place for anything but a hail-of-arrows burst of action, but lesser weapons can be balanced over to more fantasy-based analogues.
Pirates using these to open up a raid before charging in with a cutlass seems fine, but they'd have to appear less lethal or efficient than they were in real life (obviously). Which is easy when everyone can channel magic or take several hits, etc.
It may be not mtg related, but modern guns do have a problem with work of fiction based on wizards. The issue is you want to show powerful wizard casting spell and engaging in magical duels and guns prevent that. How? They simply are too powerful, while your fire mage is channeling his power to cast the spell, your average guy have already shot him in the face.
That is complete bunk, magic in magic the gathering is not required to have components like that, Heck each color has magic that can end a fight faster than a bullet or negate a bullet.
White - Hieromancy, Gideon Style Immunity*
Blue - Illusions, Bounce effects**, Polymorphing someone, Mind Control effects.
Red - Lightning Magic, Earth Magic.
Green - Summoning Vines to entangle someone's arm, making one sturdy enough to survive getting shot, regenerating the wound.
Black - Regenerating the Wound, Straight Kill Spell, heck a High level Dimentia Caster could just puke a monster into existence between you and the bullet.
*Gideon was not the first to show off this type of spell, in The Oddessy block the Order used the exact same magics.
**Bounce spells come in flavors of "That just doesn't exist anymore." sometimes.
While I agree that Vampires as conquistador/missionary metaphors are a bit on the nose, the Aztecs weren't the only mesoamerican culture the Spanish conquered. Ixalan could be taking more inspiration from the Maya civilisation instead for example. Either way, no one is denying that the Aztecs had a very brutal culture. Since Ixalan is probably NOT supposed to be an exact metaphor for the exact conflict between the conquistadors and the Aztecs though (I'm pretty sure I would remember Aztecs riding on dinosaurs for example) I fail to see your point.
You admit that the depiction is a bit on the nose, then fail to see a point in wondering if the natives are going to be depicted accurately?
No, you missed my point in that the natives don't have to be depicted like that since they don't have to be inspired by the Aztecs. And while it isn't very subtle, I definitely don't mind the "Vampires as conquistadors" angle.
That is complete bunk, magic in magic the gathering is not required to have components like that, Heck each color has magic that can end a fight faster than a bullet or negate a bullet.
White - Hieromancy, Gideon Style Immunity*
Blue - Illusions, Bounce effects**, Polymorphing someone, Mind Control effects.
Red - Lightning Magic, Earth Magic.
Green - Summoning Vines to entangle someone's arm, making one sturdy enough to survive getting shot, regenerating the wound.
Black - Regenerating the Wound, Straight Kill Spell, heck a High level Dimentia Caster could just puke a monster into existence between you and the bullet.
*Gideon was not the first to show off this type of spell, in The Oddessy block the Order used the exact same magics.
**Bounce spells come in flavors of "That just doesn't exist anymore." sometimes.
Actually all the things you listed won't work.
The problem with modern fire weapons is that the bullet has already hit the target when you notice that someone has shot you.
For exemple Gideon shield isn't always up, he have to chose to use it and before he chose so he is already dead. With lightning magic you will be dead before you can channel the spell, this is also true for all the other kind of magic.
The fact that you can't know that someone shot you before the bullet hits its target it's not the only problem, lets say you do know when someone shoot by looking at his/her fingers on the trigger you can't still do anything to prevent your death because the bullet is faster then your reaction time. Even if the high level dementia caster know when I pull the trigger he can't summoning anything because the bullet would be in his brain before he can do anything.
As long as your mage is a human he cannot "dodge" the bullet.
None of that is true, spell casting is as fast as you have trained your mind to do it. If you have the spell prepared you can instantly make all of those effects go off as fast as a gun.
Edit : Go read the Dark, it describes in Detail how Mana based spell casting works.
Casting spells is done at the speed of thought, and I'm pretty sure Gideon's shield has gone off when he wasn't even paying attention. I always thought it was auto. If it can react to the impact of rocks and stuff, why couldn't it react to the impact of a bullet? I just feel like you're arguing from a place of pure opinion, and that's fine, but you're trying to use a real world comparison on one real world thing and one fictional thing.
If a mage and a gunslinger are having a quick draw match, and the mage can lightning bolt the gunslinger before he draws his gun, its GG. Guns don't automatically trump magic. How is a bullet faster than lightning?
Casting spells is done at the speed of thought, and I'm pretty sure Gideon's shield has gone off when he wasn't even paying attention. I always thought it was auto. If it can react to the impact of rocks and stuff, why couldn't it react to the impact of a bullet? I just feel like you're arguing from a place of pure opinion, and that's fine, but you're trying to use a real world comparison on one real world thing and one fictional thing.
If a mage and a gunslinger are having a quick draw match, and the mage can lightning bolt the gunslinger before he draws his gun, its GG. Guns don't automatically trump magic. How is a bullet faster than lightning?
Casting spells is very much not at the speed of thought. Unleashing spells is at the speed of thought, but they have made it abundantly clear that mages have to prep spells which can take quite a while or be fairly fast and that things can be so hectic that it is difficult for a mage to prepare a spell. They have been shaky on whether Gid's shield is auto or controlled. Before Zen he got shanked by a goblin on Rav because he was tired and not focusing. During Zen they made a point that he was having trouble with the Eldrazi because of their unpredictable movements he had to keep his shield up all over his body. Other times they have simply made it obvious that he was thinking about the shield. But a few times it has seemed to be auto, but there is a lot more evidence for controlled rather than auto.
There's a story I've been reading called promise in blood where the gun powder is essentially the source of their magic they can use it to enhance their speed and senses. I think it all depends on how they flavor it. Maybe a lightning spell that could be prepared in the casing of a bullet and then shot out the gun.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Star Wars and the Matrix seem to examples refuting your point of guns not mixing with magic
Low-power cube enthusiast!
My 1570 card cube (no longer updated)
My 415 Peasant+ Artifact and Enchantment Cube
Ever-Expanding "Just throw it in" cube.
If "The Force" isn't a magical entity then I am not sure what would ever be considered magical. Again, with the Matrix, Neo's ability to stop bullets mid-air is pretty magical. They're different interpretations of magic but I don't know how you would define them without using a convoluted argument of semantics as they're both examples of supernatural powers.
That is a holstered single-hand crossbow.
Just because you think something is a gun doesn't mean it is a gun. There are no guns on Innistrad. There are hand held projectile weapons, but they are crossbows.
Pretty far off topic at this point...but Neo's abilities eventually extend outside of the confines of the Matrix. Maybe you're not considering that portion of the series since most people think the movies totally lost their way - I can buy that. But I was just using that scene as an example because it showed "magical" abilities and the ability was used to stop bullets - referencing the argument posted further up for why magic and guns couldn't coexist. Clearly, it was a pretty bad example though since in that scene he was within the matrix and you're absolutely right - he was just hacking it.
Again, apologies for letting this runaway train go so far
Back on topic, the original point being made was you can't 'add' guns to a fantasy setting because it's screws with power balance. They specifically said you could design a fantasy world with guns you would simply need to build in foils to the guns. Star wars had their 'bullets' being slow and deflectable, so rather than being a strength they were a liability. In the Matrix the bad guys could simply move fast enough to dodge bullets and Neo had his hax.
MTG has no safe guard against fire arms. Spell casting is usually slow, exceptions vary. In the time it would take Jace to conjure an illusion or Chandra a fireball you could easily empty the clip of modern day guns, or even wild west style revolvers. They could go the usually used horrible route of nobody can aim, or even actively aims away from people but that is annoying as heck. In a more accurate example of guns and magic, the Dresden Files, they make a point that while offensive magic may have travel time it is launched at the speed of thought so defenses can be raised instantly.
Yo what? Where is this ever referenced? I NEED
I, err, I'm pretty sure the whole last half of that post was just a reference to the Nightmare Before Christmas...???
The additional continent, and the elves I think, were mentioned/hinted at having actually existed though??? Maybe? It sounds familiar anyhow.
They mentioned the elves of Innistrad at some point, here is the quote from our wiki:
"According to the creative team, Elves were once present on Innistrad, but were driven to extinction."
Thanks to DarkNightCavalier from Heroes of the Plane Studios for this sick Signature.
IIRC it Brady on the old wizard forum said it was a working idea for the werewolf curse, it was from elves being killed off and while it could be canon, it seems like it never truly confirmed? Its Schrödinger's canon. Much how we knew Avacyn was very robotic acting, before the current creative team pinned down her personality.
"You can tell how dumb someone is by how they use Mary Sue"
- there are goblins on Ixalan, blue-skinned (promo Walk the Plank). They seem to be on the pirate side. DD: Goblins vs. Merfolks makes more sense now
- Tilonalli is the name of either the Burning Sun itself, or a deity it embodies.
The cards also kind of confirm the rare sheet leak, as Bishop and BSA are exactly as deciphered.
Let this great clan rest in peace (2001-2011)
Looks like a monkey to me, which would be way more on theme
The pirate's treasure shows a firearm.
The concentric U's on the Warrior Woman's chest plate shows up all over the Dinosaur treasure, it must be their symbol. Ugin!
The Vampire symbols seem to be a black rose (but NOT Marchesa's, it could be anything).
The Ixalan Goblin-Monkeys are blue, look like Tarkiran or Fioran goblins with those beards.
TerribleBad at Magic since 1998.A Vorthos Guide to Magic Story | Twitter | Tumblr
[Primer] Krenko | Azor | Kess | Zacama | Kumena | Sram | The Ur-Dragon | Edgar Markov | Daretti | Marath
Yes its a bit on the nose honestly and I am sure they will represent the Aztecs accurately, including blood sacrifice, raiding their neighbors to gain more slaves to sacrifice, and said neighbors siding with the conquistadors against the aztecs.
Also the Warhammer universe has guns and tanks even.
While I agree that Vampires as conquistador/missionary metaphors are a bit on the nose, the Aztecs weren't the only mesoamerican culture the Spanish conquered. Ixalan could be taking more inspiration from the Maya civilisation instead for example. Either way, no one is denying that the Aztecs had a very brutal culture. Since Ixalan is probably NOT supposed to be an exact metaphor for the exact conflict between the conquistadors and the Aztecs though (I'm pretty sure I would remember Aztecs riding on dinosaurs for example) I fail to see your point.
Also, as has been discussed quite a bit on multiple threads here, Wizards has been very rigorous about not using fire arms (at least not non-magical ones) in MtG. Magical ones like in Kaladesh (which arguably also featured tanks and mecha) are fine though.
You admit that the depiction is a bit on the nose, then fail to see a point in wondering if the natives are going to be depicted accurately?
Anything that has loading time, honestly, is fine. It just has to match the idea of "can we feasibly show a mage fighting against this?" So energy-charge weapons that take a bit to fire and/or have slower velocities or flintlocks, etc. could easily work. Six-shooters could work as magical-focus objects working on mana reserves and said people could take several hits, like they do with arrows and such already. Its just a matter of worldbuilding, where something like a full-auto obviously is out of place for anything but a hail-of-arrows burst of action, but lesser weapons can be balanced over to more fantasy-based analogues.
Pirates using these to open up a raid before charging in with a cutlass seems fine, but they'd have to appear less lethal or efficient than they were in real life (obviously). Which is easy when everyone can channel magic or take several hits, etc.
That is complete bunk, magic in magic the gathering is not required to have components like that, Heck each color has magic that can end a fight faster than a bullet or negate a bullet.
White - Hieromancy, Gideon Style Immunity*
Blue - Illusions, Bounce effects**, Polymorphing someone, Mind Control effects.
Red - Lightning Magic, Earth Magic.
Green - Summoning Vines to entangle someone's arm, making one sturdy enough to survive getting shot, regenerating the wound.
Black - Regenerating the Wound, Straight Kill Spell, heck a High level Dimentia Caster could just puke a monster into existence between you and the bullet.
*Gideon was not the first to show off this type of spell, in The Oddessy block the Order used the exact same magics.
**Bounce spells come in flavors of "That just doesn't exist anymore." sometimes.
Dragons of Legend, Lead by Scion of the UR-Dragon
The Gitrog Monster
Gonti, Lord of Luxury
Shogun Saskia
Hive World
Atraxa hates fun
Abzan
No, you missed my point in that the natives don't have to be depicted like that since they don't have to be inspired by the Aztecs. And while it isn't very subtle, I definitely don't mind the "Vampires as conquistadors" angle.
None of that is true, spell casting is as fast as you have trained your mind to do it. If you have the spell prepared you can instantly make all of those effects go off as fast as a gun.
Edit : Go read the Dark, it describes in Detail how Mana based spell casting works.
Dragons of Legend, Lead by Scion of the UR-Dragon
The Gitrog Monster
Gonti, Lord of Luxury
Shogun Saskia
Hive World
Atraxa hates fun
Abzan
If a mage and a gunslinger are having a quick draw match, and the mage can lightning bolt the gunslinger before he draws his gun, its GG. Guns don't automatically trump magic. How is a bullet faster than lightning?