Æther Chasm :3mana::symu:
Enchantment (R)
Imprint - If a nontoken creature would come into play, instead remove it from the game, then put another imprinted creature card into play under its owner's control.
As it stands, I think that if two of these were in play, it would be a hard lock on creature spells (an infinite loop, actually, therefore draw), since replacement effects can replace the results of other replacement effects. Is there any way I can word this so it doesn't happen? (Other than adding the word "Legendary" to the type line, that is.)
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Vive, vale. Siquid novisti rectius istis,
candidus inperti; si nil, his utere mecum.
Æther Chasm :3mana::symu:
Enchantment (R)
Imprint - If a nontoken creature would come into play, instead remove it from the game, then put another imprinted creature card into play under its owner's control.
As it stands, I think that if two of these were in play, it would be a hard lock on creature spells (an infinite loop, actually, therefore draw), since replacement effects can replace the results of other replacement effects. Is there any way I can word this so it doesn't happen? (Other than adding the word "Legendary" to the type line, that is.)
If a nontoken creature card would come into play from its owner's hand...
(It's also very flavorful - see, there's a CHASM between the hand and the in-play zone ... an AETHER CHASM...)
If a nontoken creature card would come into play from its owner's hand...
*slaps forehead*
This wouldn't work, but "creature would come into play from the stack" or "creature played from its owner's hand would come into play" would. Thank you.
EDIT: Changed it to "If a creature spell would resolve;" not wordy at all!
Enchantment (R)
Imprint - If a nontoken creature would come into play, instead remove it from the game, then put another imprinted creature card into play under its owner's control.
As it stands, I think that if two of these were in play, it would be a hard lock on creature spells (an infinite loop, actually, therefore draw), since replacement effects can replace the results of other replacement effects. Is there any way I can word this so it doesn't happen? (Other than adding the word "Legendary" to the type line, that is.)
candidus inperti; si nil, his utere mecum.
If a nontoken creature card would come into play from its owner's hand...
(It's also very flavorful - see, there's a CHASM between the hand and the in-play zone ... an AETHER CHASM...)
*slaps forehead*
This wouldn't work, but "creature would come into play from the stack" or "creature played from its owner's hand would come into play" would. Thank you.
EDIT: Changed it to "If a creature spell would resolve;" not wordy at all!
candidus inperti; si nil, his utere mecum.