The statement was, there are other people who read these threads (other people who may be inspired—but don't voice the opinion).
And that is definite based on the thread views.
Nothing else needs to be proven. One should respect that there are other people in the world other than themselves and not think to disturb them with one's own devotion to dictatorship. That is exactly what you do when you enter my threads, and don't agree to disagree, but insist that I agree.
You are correct that it is POSSIBLE that there is some group of people reading these comments who are somehow “inspired” by your posting.
However, the nature of internet discourse it that people are far more likely to jump on to comment about something they disagree with, yet no one has chimed in to disagree with the huge volume of replies critical of you.
Given the actual responses to your posts, then, it is most PROBABLE that most reading your posts also recognize the flaws in your rules knowledge, gameplay experience or use of the English language and agree with those assessments.
Sadly, the way these things are thought to be picked out are done often far outside any spirit of brotherhood.
And with that said, it's deemable that the culture here for members replying to my posts negatively is to entertain ulterior motives, such as to tease abusive tendencies (and not to correct simple misconceptions).
Once again, I never conduct myself like this is other people's threads. I set a good example you all should consider following.
And with that said, it's deemable that the culture here for members replying to my posts negatively is to entertain ulterior motives, such as to tease abusive tendencies (and not to correct simple misconceptions).
Yeah, because of course it wouldn’t even enter your mind that people might just understand rules and gameplay better than someone who hasn’t played Magic in more than a decade and also find your bloated sense of self importance completely insufferable. Clearly you being the victim of a vast internet conspiracy to mock you makes far more sense.
Sadly, the way these things are thought to be picked out are done often far outside any spirit of brotherhood.
And with that said, it's deemable that the culture here for members replying to my posts negatively is to entertain ulterior motives, such as to tease abusive tendencies (and not to correct simple misconceptions).
Once again, I never conduct myself like this is other people's threads. I set a good example you all should consider following.
All that being said, we just start reporting our friend as trolling/spamming from here on out, yeah? What else is this?
You are correct that it is POSSIBLE that there is some group of people reading these comments who are somehow “inspired” by your posting.
However, the nature of internet discourse it that people are far more likely to jump on to comment about something they disagree with, yet no one has chimed in to disagree with the huge volume of replies critical of you.
Given the actual responses to your posts, then, it is most PROBABLE that most reading your posts also recognize the flaws in your rules knowledge, gameplay experience or use of the English language and agree with those assessments.
And with that said, it's deemable that the culture here for members replying to my posts negatively is to entertain ulterior motives, such as to tease abusive tendencies (and not to correct simple misconceptions).
Once again, I never conduct myself like this is other people's threads. I set a good example you all should consider following.
Yeah, because of course it wouldn’t even enter your mind that people might just understand rules and gameplay better than someone who hasn’t played Magic in more than a decade and also find your bloated sense of self importance completely insufferable. Clearly you being the victim of a vast internet conspiracy to mock you makes far more sense.
All that being said, we just start reporting our friend as trolling/spamming from here on out, yeah? What else is this?
That's actually an abuse of the moderation console and TOS.
No one has to agree with another person on a discussion forum.
It's not a reportable offence. We should all do well to respect Free Speech. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
What is this of someone who does not?