So I had a day of creative juices flowing (finally fixing my four horsemen too) and came up with this guy Went to my favorite Deviant art artists (Daniel Kamarudin) and thus Zyokiss was born. Of course I am still debating on creature type but that is not the important part right now.
Zyokiss, the Imprinter
3UU
Legendary Creature - ??????????
Flying
Creature you control share all creature types.
You may pay WUBRG instead of paying the creature's mana cost if you control a creature of the same type.
4/4
This guy has a LOT of potential. He was actually created over a year ago (2016) and his main goal is to be a lord creature. Lord tribal basically. Goblin king, Lord of Atlantis, Sporecrown thallid, Lyra Dawnbringer, Cemetery reaper, just to name a few. In EDH all are playable to keep the good times rolling. Along with granting access to Sliver Hivelord as Indestructible is a GREAT ability to have. Drogskol Captain gives me even more pump and Hexproof. Coat of arms is a great card to have as well.
As you can see this guy is not meant to combo out (though I am sure one could pull it off) N, instead his goal is to use lords and just roll face. (a few lord in and he is no longer a 4/4 but gcould easily be a 7/7. 10/10, 21/21 (well 21/21 may be a little far fetched but it is possible. I mean Might sliver is a card.
There will also be clones to clone the more powerful lords. I just wish to know, is Zyokiss broken?
While I find it interesting and even possible to use share like this I advise against. Because the word share is already used when making a comparison creating a state of sharing opens ambiguity that doesn't need to exisit.
Otherwise the card is interesting and the exisitance of the second ability gives a viable excuse as to not just make everything every creature type. I think the wording needs fixing but I'm on mobile and its troublesome to check all that, will look again when on a real computer. He is probably to expensive or too small. At least I would want him to curve into his ability so putting him at 4 possible as a 3/4 should be a start.
While I find it interesting and even possible to use share like this I advise against. Because the word share is already used when making a comparison creating a state of sharing opens ambiguity that doesn't need to exisit.
Otherwise the card is interesting and the exisitance of the second ability gives a viable excuse as to not just make everything every creature type. I think the wording needs fixing but I'm on mobile and its troublesome to check all that, will look again when on a real computer. He is probably to expensive or too small. At least I would want him to curve into his ability so putting him at 4 possible as a 3/4 should be a start.
It is to avoid changeling as that is a ruling nightmare to begin with. (and if i throw in a changeling the ruling nightmare happens all over again.
At least this way, the creature types only apply when he is on the battlefield and they are negated when he leaves. All those lords do next to nothing when he is gone.
so a 3/4 for 2UU. Only reason i made him 3UU was due to his static ability. (Then again Atraxa is a 4/4 Flying, Bigilance, Lifelink and deathtouch for 4, Along with the proliferate. her downfall is being 4 colors where this guy can be mono blue.
I think I've got wording that accomplishes what you want without new terminology or templating.
Each creature you control has all creature types of every creature you control in addition to its other types.
The second ability should be worded
You may pay WUBRG rather than pay the mana cost for creature spells that you cast as long as it shares a creature type with a creature you control.
Same appears to be used when matching exactly while shares is used when partial matches are fine, though its hard to tell as same isn't used on things that have multiple answers like color or type. Though this is another reason not to bring in ambiguity of what share means.
I think I've got wording that accomplishes what you want without new terminology or templating.
Each creature you control has all creature types of every creature you control in addition to its other types.
The second ability should be worded
You may pay WUBRG rather than pay the mana cost for creature spells that you cast as long as it shares a creature type with a creature you control.
Same appears to be used when matching exactly while shares is used when partial matches are fine, though its hard to tell as same isn't used on things that have multiple answers like color or type. Though this is another reason not to bring in ambiguity of what share means.
the fact that sharing is causing issues is really unfortunate as the wording itself makes thing so much easier. I mean you understand what it says.
Zyokiss, the Imprinter
3UU
Legendary Creature - ??????????
Flying
Creature you control share all creature types.
You may pay WUBRG instead of paying the creature's mana cost if you control a creature of the same type.
4/4
This guy has a LOT of potential. He was actually created over a year ago (2016) and his main goal is to be a lord creature. Lord tribal basically. Goblin king, Lord of Atlantis, Sporecrown thallid, Lyra Dawnbringer, Cemetery reaper, just to name a few. In EDH all are playable to keep the good times rolling. Along with granting access to Sliver Hivelord as Indestructible is a GREAT ability to have. Drogskol Captain gives me even more pump and Hexproof. Coat of arms is a great card to have as well.
As you can see this guy is not meant to combo out (though I am sure one could pull it off) N, instead his goal is to use lords and just roll face. (a few lord in and he is no longer a 4/4 but gcould easily be a 7/7. 10/10, 21/21 (well 21/21 may be a little far fetched but it is possible. I mean Might sliver is a card.
There will also be clones to clone the more powerful lords. I just wish to know, is Zyokiss broken?
UB Vela the Night-Clad BUDecklist
WBG Ghave, Guru of Spores GBW
WUBRGThe Ur-DragonWUBRGDecklist
Otherwise the card is interesting and the exisitance of the second ability gives a viable excuse as to not just make everything every creature type. I think the wording needs fixing but I'm on mobile and its troublesome to check all that, will look again when on a real computer. He is probably to expensive or too small. At least I would want him to curve into his ability so putting him at 4 possible as a 3/4 should be a start.
It is to avoid changeling as that is a ruling nightmare to begin with. (and if i throw in a changeling the ruling nightmare happens all over again.
At least this way, the creature types only apply when he is on the battlefield and they are negated when he leaves. All those lords do next to nothing when he is gone.
so a 3/4 for 2UU. Only reason i made him 3UU was due to his static ability. (Then again Atraxa is a 4/4 Flying, Bigilance, Lifelink and deathtouch for 4, Along with the proliferate. her downfall is being 4 colors where this guy can be mono blue.
UB Vela the Night-Clad BUDecklist
WBG Ghave, Guru of Spores GBW
WUBRGThe Ur-DragonWUBRGDecklist
The second ability should be worded
Same appears to be used when matching exactly while shares is used when partial matches are fine, though its hard to tell as same isn't used on things that have multiple answers like color or type. Though this is another reason not to bring in ambiguity of what share means.
the fact that sharing is causing issues is really unfortunate as the wording itself makes thing so much easier. I mean you understand what it says.
UB Vela the Night-Clad BUDecklist
WBG Ghave, Guru of Spores GBW
WUBRGThe Ur-DragonWUBRGDecklist