KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
So much time is spent building up the Tomorrowland lore that none of the characters get any chance to have an arc or do much of anything except run away from robots and have action scenes. There were several avenues it could have explored, like how a place built by dreamers gets turned into a dystopia or how images of destruction only makes humans crave it more, but it went for the safe, tepid route of blowing up the machine to save the world. With optimism.
I would have liked it a lot more if every single action scene from the nerd shop to Paris was replaced with something that actually mattered to the story being told.
I really liked what he was trying to do, with the overall message. There were some annoyances, but overall I liked it more than I didn't.
I would have liked it a lot more if every single action scene from the nerd shop to Paris was replaced with something that actually mattered to the story being told.
Hewo wittle fishy!