There is creature type artificer. 5 in Mirrodin and one in Mirage. So I don't think he will be artificer too. Flectomancer? That makes me wonder - maybe there is still something to do with artifacts? Flect means making flexible, doesn't it?
BweeBwee- there isn't a type "artificer". There is a type "wizard". They are almost similar
On the contrary, there are not only 6 artificers, four of them are goblin artificers! Artificer is very different than wizard, since wizards work with magic, while artificers work with metal. I think its quite likely that he will be an artificer.
I'm positive that he'll probably ping/draw cards/copy spells/some other random effect
At least we know it'll probably be a creature. There is a chance, albeit slight, that it'll be a spell. I doubt it, because the goblin is the center of the art's focus.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Banner and avatar by me.
Official Character Sheet Shredder of DAMNIT
DAMNIT: I should never have to shred my own character sheet in frustration.
Okay, suppose he is an artificer, what will he do? handing him the creature type of artificer isn't very good if he doesn't affect artifacts. How will he affect artifacts, and how will affecting those artifacts be an Izzet thing.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Banner and avatar by me.
Official Character Sheet Shredder of DAMNIT
DAMNIT: I should never have to shred my own character sheet in frustration.
Help has come in the form of a bit of basic algebra. I feel that it'll shed some light on your problem here.
Basically:
S + T = W
...S in this case stands for 'spam' and the T stands for 'light trolling'. And the W? That stands for 'Warning'. I love math. -- {mikeyG}
Help has come in the form of a bit of basic algebra. I feel that it'll shed some light on your problem here.
Basically:
S + T = W
...S in this case stands for 'spam' and the T stands for 'light trolling'. And the W? That stands for 'Warning'. I love math. -- {mikeyG}
Help has come in the form of a bit of basic algebra. I feel that it'll shed some light on your problem here.
Basically:
S + T = W
...S in this case stands for 'spam' and the T stands for 'light trolling'. And the W? That stands for 'Warning'. I love math. -- {mikeyG}
Oh, another "izzet" artifact is glass golem. i suppose it could go either way between wizard and artificer, but we won't know for sure until we see it.
Runeboggle 2U
instant
Counter target spell unless its controller pays
Draw a card.
Cerebral Cortex 1UR
Instant
Target player draws two cards, then Cerebral Cortex deals damage to that player equal the number of cards that player has drawn this turn.
I kind of like them both, runeboggle would've been a million times better at 1U, but oh well, i can kind of see it getting some play, maybe.
The more i think about cerebral cortex, the more i like it. Its instant draw for a relatively small price (two damage, 3 mana), its a card draw hoser against U/x decks, and it's a pseudo finisher, basically 3+ damage, all in one. I think i'd play it.
Guys incase you haven't seen the cerebral vortex card take a look. Incase you dismiss it as junk lets examine what we just got here. Instant card draw for three mana. Excelent compared to any other card draw we've seen latley. In addition we also get anti combo tech along with a possible finisher. Guys this is the card I was looking for to put Izzet into competative play.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
High Mage of Frontier Knowledge in the [Izzet] clan:symru: Want to know the secret to chaos Click Here
wow, im gone for a day and 6 more pages, holy crap we like to talk. i like the mizzium transthingymawhat. it takes away any jitte problems, course we already had shattering spree. i think that wotc is trying to kill jitte, i mean, izzet gets those, gruul gets that new activated ability dude that deals damage, poor jitte even though i hate playing against it... and i doubt well get an artificer, those belong in mirrodin, of course, so does shattering spree and the mizzium transthingy.
and i dont really like those new cards... i can see that 1 draw/damage thing in combo with the puzzle box, but ur opponent still gets more cards. of course, if u have niv its 2 damage 2 ur opponent too...
Guys incase you haven't seen the cerebral vortex card take a look. Incase you dismiss it as junk lets examine what we just got here. Instant card draw for three mana. Excelent compared to any other card draw we've seen latley. In addition we also get anti combo tech along with a possible finisher. Guys this is the card I was looking for to put Izzet into competative play.
Sarnath'd pretty much. Look at the post above you.
I had fun saying it, considering its my first time. Whoo! Where did the phrase originate from anyways, i'm curious, sarnath seems like kind of a random word.
Anyways, i think we shoudl get into some serious deck discussion for the likely competetive izzet deck soon.
On the contrary, there are not only 6 artificers, four of them are goblin artificers! Artificer is very different than wizard, since wizards work with magic, while artificers work with metal. I think its quite likely that he will be an artificer.
At least we know it'll probably be a creature. There is a chance, albeit slight, that it'll be a spell. I doubt it, because the goblin is the center of the art's focus.
The Official Vodka Duke of the 499
Visit my best/worst cards by collector's number thread!
Stardust Siggies! Wonderful graphics:D
Help has come in the form of a bit of basic algebra. I feel that it'll shed some light on your problem here.
Basically:
S + T = W
...S in this case stands for 'spam' and the T stands for 'light trolling'. And the W? That stands for 'Warning'. I love math. -- {mikeyG}
Help has come in the form of a bit of basic algebra. I feel that it'll shed some light on your problem here.
Basically:
S + T = W
...S in this case stands for 'spam' and the T stands for 'light trolling'. And the W? That stands for 'Warning'. I love math. -- {mikeyG}
Help has come in the form of a bit of basic algebra. I feel that it'll shed some light on your problem here.
Basically:
S + T = W
...S in this case stands for 'spam' and the T stands for 'light trolling'. And the W? That stands for 'Warning'. I love math. -- {mikeyG}
Artist Strikes Fish
Anyhow, I STILL dont see my name on the friends list
I've asked on every thread except one I believe...
Runeboggle
2U
instant
Counter target spell unless its controller pays
Draw a card.
Cerebral Cortex
1UR
Instant
Target player draws two cards, then Cerebral Cortex deals damage to that player equal the number of cards that player has drawn this turn.
I kind of like them both, runeboggle would've been a million times better at 1U, but oh well, i can kind of see it getting some play, maybe.
The more i think about cerebral cortex, the more i like it. Its instant draw for a relatively small price (two damage, 3 mana), its a card draw hoser against U/x decks, and it's a pseudo finisher, basically 3+ damage, all in one. I think i'd play it.
High Mage of Frontier Knowledge in the [Izzet] clan:symru: Want to know the secret to chaos Click Here
and i dont really like those new cards... i can see that 1 draw/damage thing in combo with the puzzle box, but ur opponent still gets more cards. of course, if u have niv its 2 damage 2 ur opponent too...
Sarnath'd pretty much. Look at the post above you.
High Mage of Frontier Knowledge in the [Izzet] clan:symru: Want to know the secret to chaos Click Here
Anyways, i think we shoudl get into some serious deck discussion for the likely competetive izzet deck soon.
Sure.
Turn one: Land
Turn two: land, izzet signet.
Turn three: land, dragonspeaker shaman
turn four: niv-mizzet.
Turn five: deal one by drawing a card at the beginning of turn, dragon mage. Swing with niv. (15)
Turn six: deal one. (14) Swing (5) deal 7. (-2)
Or some thing along those lines, just off the top of my head.