I am again so happy to see people still voting like this on day 4, and Tubba's piss poor reaction to the vote.
Would voting Cuth harder make a difference for you? I get that you’re pissed, but this doesn’t help solve me or Cuth. I’ve stated why I think Cuth is scum, and I’m not shocked that he naked voted me. But I’m curious, what reaction are you looking for here?
I keep being paranoid that Wisp is super deep wolfing but I think he claimed somewhere that there are 5 OG Witted and he claimed that early. I doubt that info would likely be given to Mafia if they asked for it. Would it?
honestly the biggest thing here is if you've seen anything in his play that would come from scum!Wisp, show me.
The only thing that really comes to mind is the jump onto Bessie when I mistakenly thought she claimed Cantrip's role. Could have been a mistake though.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but for the vit drains we have
Night 1: Highroller only
Night 2: GJ only
Night 3: Highroller and BoomFrog
If Night 3 was the first instance of two people claiming it, a possible and simple explanation is that Sloth/BoomFrog are just scum together. Otherwise scum would have to be using their vit drain on their NK targets but randomly decided to target a living person on Night 3. And I don't think BoomFrog's role is such a threat that they needed to steal from him.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
ugh just realized I messed up the best-case scenario
Best: BoomFrog/Anak are both mafia. Kill BoomFrog, Night is 6 1 3. Wisp nabs Anak, 6 2. NK probably goes through, 5 2. IF Cuth kills mafia, Day starts at 5 1. We're in a great spot, whether it's 5 2 or 5 1.
I subtracted a villager, so 6 should be 7 and 5 should be 6.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Lots of speculation incoming. In the absence of actual reads, I'm turning to the votecount for guidance. All of this relies on Cuth/Tammy/KJ/Bur townreads, but for the initial premise only Tammy/KJ townreads are super relevant going into Night. The others can be debated on Day 5 if we make it that far.
If Tubba is a villager, the mafia are probably evenly split between the two top wagons, whether or not you include Cuth in your scumreads: a group of 8 on the main wagon, and a group of 6 off-wagon that are all unflipped. I'd be surprised if the entire team was parked on Azrael/off Tubba [and in that world I think Tubba is more likely mafia, because maybe he has a really strong role and scum absolutely do not want to bus], which means I think if we kill in Anak/BoomFrog, we have high chances of hitting 1, maybe 2 mafia. My feelings about Anak are a mess but with all the controversey, I don't feel like I can be sure about defending him.
ToDay is probably 7 1 4. Let's go through the best-, wost-, and middle-case scenarios. I'm not going to rely on us voting out Anak to get rid of Wisp, because Cuth will probably be blocked again to prevent us from solving with his kill. I imagine Wisp will only be blocked if Anak is mafia.
Worst: BoomFrog/Anak are both town. We kill BoomFrog and go into Night with 6 1 4. Assuming Wisp is successful with killing Anak and leaving the game, we're at 5 4. It's complicated [for me] to play out scenarios here because mafia can't block both Cuth and Tammy, and they're gambling on whether or not to give Cuth a chance to hit mafia OR for Tammy to block the NK. We probably lose in this world because too many dead villagers and unknown variables.
Best: BoomFrog/Anak are both mafia. Kill BoomFrog, Night is 6 1 3. Wisp nabs Anak, 6 2. NK probably goes through, 5 2. IF Cuth kills mafia, Day starts at 5 1. We're in a great spot, whether it's 5 2 or 5 1.
Middle: There's one mafia in BoomFrog/Anak. After they both die, Night is 6 3. Blah blah vig shenanigans, vit shenanigans, NK shenanigans. This still isn't awful, we're only really in a bad spot if Cuth and Sloth kill villagers in addition to the NK.
Sorry if this is confusing, but tl;dr I think BoomFrog is the best yeet, and Anak can be resolved via Wisp unless anyone thinks Boom and Anak are both villagers. If there's something wrong with my scenarios, let's talk about it. I'm aware you can't really plan for much in a closed setup but what else is there to do at this point.
If you think Anak is town why are you ok with him getting shot here?
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
My biggest problem with your plan is that I feel like it gives Mafia too much power. Honestly I think Wisp gets blocked regardless of Anak's alignment because he's always a misyeet possibility. He's always a yeet not on Mafia. I say we eliminate the variable. Yeet (Witted, probably Anak) so Wisp leaves and gives us a bunch of info going into night. It's not as efficient, but it takes less for granted. Requires the least amount of coordination and trust.
We don't need two scum dead tomorrow to solve this game. We need one, and more time.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
My biggest problem with your plan is that I feel like it gives Mafia too much power. Honestly I think Wisp gets blocked regardless of Anak's alignment because he's always a misyeet possibility. He's always a yeet not on Mafia. I say we eliminate the variable. Yeet (Witted, probably Anak) so Wisp leaves and gives us a bunch of info going into night. It's not as efficient, but it takes less for granted. Requires the least amount of coordination and trust.
We don't need two scum dead tomorrow to solve this game. We need one, and more time.
But yeeting/shooting both witted is guaranteed one (almost certainly if i shoot there too, though it feels like a bit of a waste), and yeeting one and having wisp leave the game is not guaranteed any.
Though even if it comes to that, I'm not going to vote Anak, even if it means no yeet.
However, there's one thing that's bothering me. As I was combing the thread and rereading things, I noticed that HR lost vit N1 (like Vaimes just brought up). However, after we claimed today, HR hasn't even mentioned it once today.
Which is especially weird after Sloth claimed that they take away vitality and claimed that they didn't use their ability N1.
KJ also bring up now that he lost vit N2 is weird and not worrisome.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
Another thing that caught my eye during Sloth's ISO of early game is that HR keeps calling HR out for tunneling and not having any reads except Wisp... And leaves it at that.
No pushing, no voting. Just constantly calling out how he didn't like HR for reasons above.
(I mentioned early game cause Sloth has massive ISO and I haven't made it thought it completely yet)
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
My biggest problem with your plan is that I feel like it gives Mafia too much power. Honestly I think Wisp gets blocked regardless of Anak's alignment because he's always a misyeet possibility. He's always a yeet not on Mafia. I say we eliminate the variable. Yeet (Witted, probably Anak) so Wisp leaves and gives us a bunch of info going into night. It's not as efficient, but it takes less for granted. Requires the least amount of coordination and trust.
We don't need two scum dead tomorrow to solve this game. We need one, and more time.
But yeeting/shooting both witted is guaranteed one (almost certainly if i shoot there too, though it feels like a bit of a waste), and yeeting one and having wisp leave the game is not guaranteed any.
I'm curious who you're planning on shooting but I'm not sure it's a good idea to say it.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I’m gonna ask again: does anyone think Anak and Boom are both town?
If yes, then I struggle to see a scenario where town!Tubba is being voted by eight non-mafia. That also means we have a higher chance of killing scum by killing any random sucker on the EoD2 Azrael wagon.
I’m gonna ask again: does anyone think Anak and Boom are both town?
If yes, then I struggle to see a scenario where town!Tubba is being voted by eight non-mafia. That also means we have a higher chance of killing scum by killing any random sucker on the EoD2 Azrael wagon.
Anak is town, Boom is ???.
I'm currently pondering if Sloth/HR/[2 of Boom/Tubba/Bessie] world makes any sense.
Though with my luck, the team is something like Vaimes/Tammy/Wisp/Anak.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
Anak progression on BoomFrog:
> starts off with a vague scumread but "possible to change"
> fifth-strongest scumread, approximately
> kind of a soft attack on GJ scumreading Boom
> thought Boom was scummy D1 but better D2, would kill to avoid a No Yeet
> latest read on Boom: Slight town, role seems pretty town as much as that can be trusted. I agree with pretty much all their thoughts on Wisp today, so that's inclining me towards towning them as well. Looks to me like they ask a lot of questions that they don't follow up with often, gives them a shallow fake kind of feel.
> scumteam guess: HR/Tubba/Cuth/Bessie or Boom
This post is hmm for me. Could be a sign they're not knowingly aligned, but could also easily be scum theater? What weirds me out the most is that Boom forgets Iso targeted Az (and makes a show of actually typing it out, which just makes it sound like a fake d'oh moment) when Boom was boasting to Wisp about how he can remember who the original witted all are.
BoomFrog progression on Anak:
> has Iso in his bottom "unsorted" pile
> next mention: I like that [Iso/Anak] stuck his neck out defending Azreal
> talking about Wisp targets: Then hit HR. Cause the other two [Anak/Az] are probably town.
> asks Anak a bunch of questions about his claim/role. I kind of like it? Seems like they aren't knowingly aligned, with the "are you still losing vit to Azrael??" questions, wanting to wait for Anak to clarify things before moving discussion along
> and I like how he transitions to "Anak should be hunting scum among the witters to get rid of Wisp instead of rolling over," it's a good point
> starts scumreading Anak, but doubts it a bit after Tammy claims doctor
> goes back to being confident Anak is scum, but votes Bur to use Wisp killing Anak as a secondary yeet
Overall I actually think I like Boom. His readswitch on Anak post-claim feels organic, and if he's w/w with Anak then he's ruining the towncred Anak had via Azrael but also not even pushing to yeet Anak, which seems like a really weird line of play for mafia.
Unvote
I guess that eliminates the Best-Case Scenario, which sucks because the idea of immediately snuffing out half of the mafia team after a horrible game had me on cloud nine.
Mm yeah I'm kind of sliding back into a townread on him. I had it in my head that KJ was just posting to post and didn't actually care about solving the game, but I think he's doing a good job of laying out his thought process from A to B to C.
I'm mostly rereading him to confirm whether or not I think all of the Tubba votes are from town. I'm probably never gonna Get There on Anak, but he's a dead man walking unless we kill Wisp so it's not a huge deal.
If there's scum voting Tubba, there's only one and it's in Anak/Boom. I'll probably switch focus to trying to find villagers on the Azrael wagon so we can toss the other names into a blender.
I just don't believe highroller/Sloth fit, cause I don't think I can make a team with that, it's certainly not Tubba with some of highroller's commdnts
And I don't think Cuth/Sloth are w/w
And in the above it's probably more like to be Sloth?
I’m gonna ask again: does anyone think Anak and Boom are both town?
If yes, then I struggle to see a scenario where town!Tubba is being voted by eight non-mafia. That also means we have a higher chance of killing scum by killing any random sucker on the EoD2 Azrael wagon.
Anak is town, Boom is ???.
I'm currently pondering if Sloth/HR/[2 of Boom/Tubba/Bessie] world makes any sense.
Though with my luck, the team is something like Vaimes/Tammy/Wisp/Anak.
I am absolutely not voting a witted here, if I am a wolf, especially not Anak, since that would out me, and I would kill a partner lol
I'd vote Anak or Tubba. Anak because he's going to die anyways, and Tubba because idk what the scumteam is doing but it looks like they're protecting a strong PR. Or if the wagons are vv then they just don't give a ****.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Would voting Cuth harder make a difference for you? I get that you’re pissed, but this doesn’t help solve me or Cuth. I’ve stated why I think Cuth is scum, and I’m not shocked that he naked voted me. But I’m curious, what reaction are you looking for here?
Best: BoomFrog/Anak are both mafia. Kill BoomFrog, Night is 6 1 3. Wisp nabs Anak, 6 2. NK probably goes through, 5 2. IF Cuth kills mafia, Day starts at 5 1. We're in a great spot, whether it's 5 2 or 5 1.
I subtracted a villager, so 6 should be 7 and 5 should be 6.
I will be around for deadline.
We don't need two scum dead tomorrow to solve this game. We need one, and more time.
But yeeting/shooting both witted is guaranteed one (almost certainly if i shoot there too, though it feels like a bit of a waste), and yeeting one and having wisp leave the game is not guaranteed any.
Though even if it comes to that, I'm not going to vote Anak, even if it means no yeet.
However, there's one thing that's bothering me. As I was combing the thread and rereading things, I noticed that HR lost vit N1 (like Vaimes just brought up). However, after we claimed today, HR hasn't even mentioned it once today.
Which is especially weird after Sloth claimed that they take away vitality and claimed that they didn't use their ability N1.
KJ also bring up now that he lost vit N2 is weird and not worrisome.
No pushing, no voting. Just constantly calling out how he didn't like HR for reasons above.
(I mentioned early game cause Sloth has massive ISO and I haven't made it thought it completely yet)
I don't think you should kill Tubba myself.
What I'm trying to say is that if HR flips scum, take a good look at Sloth.
Now that it's proven my base assumption was wrong, HR doesn't look any good at all.
@grape: Can we get vote totals?
If yes, then I struggle to see a scenario where town!Tubba is being voted by eight non-mafia. That also means we have a higher chance of killing scum by killing any random sucker on the EoD2 Azrael wagon.
Anak is town, Boom is ???.
I'm currently pondering if Sloth/HR/[2 of Boom/Tubba/Bessie] world makes any sense.
Though with my luck, the team is something like Vaimes/Tammy/Wisp/Anak.
> starts off with a vague scumread but "possible to change"
> fifth-strongest scumread, approximately
> kind of a soft attack on GJ scumreading Boom
> thought Boom was scummy D1 but better D2, would kill to avoid a No Yeet
> latest read on Boom: Slight town, role seems pretty town as much as that can be trusted. I agree with pretty much all their thoughts on Wisp today, so that's inclining me towards towning them as well. Looks to me like they ask a lot of questions that they don't follow up with often, gives them a shallow fake kind of feel.
> scumteam guess: HR/Tubba/Cuth/Bessie or Boom
This post is hmm for me. Could be a sign they're not knowingly aligned, but could also easily be scum theater? What weirds me out the most is that Boom forgets Iso targeted Az (and makes a show of actually typing it out, which just makes it sound like a fake d'oh moment) when Boom was boasting to Wisp about how he can remember who the original witted all are.
> has Iso in his bottom "unsorted" pile
> next mention: I like that [Iso/Anak] stuck his neck out defending Azreal
> talking about Wisp targets: Then hit HR. Cause the other two [Anak/Az] are probably town.
> asks Anak a bunch of questions about his claim/role. I kind of like it? Seems like they aren't knowingly aligned, with the "are you still losing vit to Azrael??" questions, wanting to wait for Anak to clarify things before moving discussion along
> and I like how he transitions to "Anak should be hunting scum among the witters to get rid of Wisp instead of rolling over," it's a good point
> starts scumreading Anak, but doubts it a bit after Tammy claims doctor
> goes back to being confident Anak is scum, but votes Bur to use Wisp killing Anak as a secondary yeet
Overall I actually think I like Boom. His readswitch on Anak post-claim feels organic, and if he's w/w with Anak then he's ruining the towncred Anak had via Azrael but also not even pushing to yeet Anak, which seems like a really weird line of play for mafia.
Unvote
I guess that eliminates the Best-Case Scenario, which sucks because the idea of immediately snuffing out half of the mafia team after a horrible game had me on cloud nine.
I'm mostly rereading him to confirm whether or not I think all of the Tubba votes are from town. I'm probably never gonna Get There on Anak, but he's a dead man walking unless we kill Wisp so it's not a huge deal.
If there's scum voting Tubba, there's only one and it's in Anak/Boom. I'll probably switch focus to trying to find villagers on the Azrael wagon so we can toss the other names into a blender.
And I don't think Cuth/Sloth are w/w
And in the above it's probably more like to be Sloth?
Or I'll move to tubba
I'd vote Anak or Tubba. Anak because he's going to die anyways, and Tubba because idk what the scumteam is doing but it looks like they're protecting a strong PR. Or if the wagons are vv then they just don't give a ****.
Why not Highroller?
I'll try to work up a VC
Wait what, we're talking about my targets?
Anak (3): Sloth, Wisp, HR
Cuth (2): Tubba, Bessie
Tubba (1): Cuth
HR (1): Anak
Not Voting (5): Bur, BoomFrog, Tammy, KJ, Vaimes
With 12 alive it takes 7 votes to reach majority.