I'm not aware of anything lol
also @rhand
I don't know what you just said
I ***** about meta reads in almost every game I am in. This can't be a shocker.
I think Rhand is saying something about you seem to be hedging about KJ, or something about you talking about KJ without any actual interest in figuring out his alignment (based on the definition of natters).
Either way, this is where roleplay starts to piss me off. When communication starts to get harder due to a RP, it makes me want to tune it out of lynch it. I might add rhetoric to the tone of the masks I wear, and add emotion to the point that sometimes it's unbelievable, but you won't struggle to read my posts, short of grammatical errors.
I mean I clearly have no idea how to read Killjoy, his posts tend to be in an 80/20 ratio most of the time regardless of his alignment for me, with 80 being scummy and 20 being townie
I am pretty sure the roleplay will die after today, but ya it does make it hard to interpret his posts, and it probably makes him look worse
There being a distinct lack of content in the last sixty-whatever posts is fine but half of the players being like "nah I'm just not gonna RVS" is
There's probably a wolf in the players who followed me onto Iso but I'm gonna town lean them all anyway
I had this thought as well, meaning one in {Silver, Rhand, Bur, Crops} - of these Crops seemed the flimsiest with the 'trend' comment.
Like, it's flimsy tho so
What do you mean by ? Is there some significance to RVS for you?
I already asked Silver for this, but might as wel ask you too:
Why? And why Crops?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
I mean I clearly have no idea how to read Killjoy, his posts tend to be in an 80/20 ratio most of the time regardless of his alignment for me, with 80 being scummy and 20 being townie
I am pretty sure the roleplay will die after today, but ya it does make it hard to interpret his posts, and it probably makes him look worse
KJ is not a difficult read.
Someone else will have to read Rhand for me, I'm not in love with the pirate flavor.
idk, ***** posts can be extra *****ty, and I usually can get a very good read of you just off your first post
That makes me sadder. It means you lost you ability to read me or you are a wolf. I really hope it's the first.
maybe its still early, I am wondering if you actually believe that read on killjoy though, removing meta reads is kinda weird
I think the other case on Killjoy in regards to him talking about rvs and not joining it, has some more merit, but it's still up in the air
Thar be somethin' amiss here.
Why does GJ hope Wisp be town misreadin' 'im o'er catchin' 'im as mafia?
'n Wisp be natterin' about th' KillJoy cases as if they be part o' somethin' he ain't part o'.
I think something is amiss with you Rhandy boi.
The wisp part is that he apparently brags he can read me correctly in games past when we were both town.
Why aren't you calling him out on him being skeptical of me not metaing in KJ? You both are aware I don't regard meta almost, at all, and you are well aware of that, as is Wisp.
I think Rhand raises a good point about you preferring that he can't read you over you having caught scum.
I also don't see a strong attempt on you to figure out which of the two is it (misread or wolf) in your interactions with Wisp.
I am not a fan of how you deflected that line of questioning from him and switched to "why aren't you questioning him instead", brushing past the alternative of having caught him.
And lastly, the two underlined sections don't seem to match: One says that you believe he can/could read you and has lost that ability, and the second that dismisses this thought at Wisp "apparently bragging" (/being wrong).
That makes me sadder. It means you lost you ability to read me or you are a wolf. I really hope it's the first.
maybe its still early, I am wondering if you actually believe that read on killjoy though, removing meta reads is kinda weird
I think the other case on Killjoy in regards to him talking about rvs and not joining it, has some more merit, but it's still up in the air
Thar be somethin' amiss here.
Why does GJ hope Wisp be town misreadin' 'im o'er catchin' 'im as mafia?
'n Wisp be natterin' about th' KillJoy cases as if they be part o' somethin' he ain't part o'.
I think something is amiss with you Rhandy boi.
The wisp part is that he apparently brags he can read me correctly in games past when we were both town.
Why aren't you calling him out on him being skeptical of me not metaing in KJ? You both are aware I don't regard meta almost, at all, and you are well aware of that, as is Wisp.
I think Rhand raises a good point about you preferring that he can't read you over you having caught scum.
I also don't see a strong attempt on you to figure out which of the two is it (misread or wolf) in your interactions with Wisp.
I am not a fan of how you deflected that line of questioning from him and switched to "why aren't you questioning him instead", brushing past the alternative of having caught him.
And lastly, the two underlined sections don't seem to match: One says that you believe he can/could read you and has lost that ability, and the second that dismisses this thought at Wisp "apparently bragging" (/being wrong).
Only thing that pinged me before I went to bed last night was killjoys post about rvs. Something felt off about noticing that a few people hadn’t participated, wondering if people didn’t do it anymore, and then not doing it himself. I tried to reason why that bugged me but every thing I thought of sounded stupid. So maybe it felt cautious in a way that felt odd. IDK. I figured I’d wait to see if anyone else noticed it too and then perhaps I was on to something, but nobody did. Not sure what to make of gentleman johnny’s push there because that should make me feel like I’m on to something but a push for not directing the game in any way on page two feels...well it feels something wrong but I just woke up and words aren’t really working.
As for the recent rvs conversation - Several people didn’t rvs actually. I purposefully did not RVS because y’all don’t know me well enough here. I don’t vote often and I often forget to vote. Usually when I do vote, it’s on someone that I’m fine with being eliminated. Therefore, my RVS vote often sits on the same person for the entirety of the day until I have a scumread I want to actually vote for. Yeah I know your vote is your voice blah blah blah, my voice is my voice my vote is for elimination. Anyway I didn’t want you guys to get confused or think my rvs vote was a real vote days from now. Yes, I know this looks like an over explanation predefense of my non rvs vote, so two scumtells at once even! but my voting practices are always asked about by people who don’t know me, so here you are.
Funny story. I realized that my post could be interpretted this way in a dream last night. In my dream Iso actually brought it up along along with a whole conversation about it and of course I straight DUNK on him and I'm the best at arguing etc.
Only in my dreams do I get to dunk on Iso.
But yeah, the reason I asked is because the first three posts of the game weren't RVS and I'm fairly sure that's actually not happened in... years?
The reason I didn't RVS right then was... well because I just didn't.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Ugh. I ****ed up that post didn't I. Here it is with the formatting corrected:
GJ really feels like he's trying to lead me somewhere with this KJ thing but I'm just not seeing it.
I think Rhand raises a good point about you preferring that he can't read you over you having caught scum.
I also don't see a strong attempt on you to figure out which of the two is it (misread or wolf) in your interactions with Wisp.
I am not a fan of how you deflected that line of questioning from him and switched to "why aren't you questioning him instead", brushing past the alternative of having caught him.
And lastly, the two underlined sections don't seem to match: One says that you believe he can/could read you and has lost that ability, and the second that dismisses this thought at Wisp "apparently bragging" (/being wrong).
Funny story. I realized that my post could be interpretted this way in a dream last night. In my dream Iso actually brought it up along along with a whole conversation about it and of course I straight DUNK on him and I'm the best at arguing etc.
Only in my dreams do I get to dunk on Iso.
This is one of the funniest posts I've ever read and if scum!KJ wrote it, I'll eat an old gym sock filled with moldy peanut butter and ketchup.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
There being a distinct lack of content in the last sixty-whatever posts is fine but half of the players being like "nah I'm just not gonna RVS" is
There's probably a wolf in the players who followed me onto Iso but I'm gonna town lean them all anyway
I had this thought as well, meaning one in {Silver, Rhand, Bur, Crops} - of these Crops seemed the flimsiest with the 'trend' comment.
Like, it's flimsy tho so
Nice scattershot. You realize that that statement is statistically true for any group of 4 players, right?
That makes me sadder. It means you lost you ability to read me or you are a wolf. I really hope it's the first.
maybe its still early, I am wondering if you actually believe that read on killjoy though, removing meta reads is kinda weird
I think the other case on Killjoy in regards to him talking about rvs and not joining it, has some more merit, but it's still up in the air
Thar be somethin' amiss here.
Why does GJ hope Wisp be town misreadin' 'im o'er catchin' 'im as mafia?
'n Wisp be natterin' about th' KillJoy cases as if they be part o' somethin' he ain't part o'.
I think something is amiss with you Rhandy boi.
The wisp part is that he apparently brags he can read me correctly in games past when we were both town.
Why aren't you calling him out on him being skeptical of me not metaing in KJ? You both are aware I don't regard meta almost, at all, and you are well aware of that, as is Wisp.
I think Rhand raises a good point about you preferring that he can't read you over you having caught scum.
I also don't see a strong attempt on you to figure out which of the two is it (misread or wolf) in your interactions with Wisp.
I am not a fan of how you deflected that line of questioning from him and switched to "why aren't you questioning him instead", brushing past the alternative of having caught him.
And lastly, the two underlined sections don't seem to match: One says that you believe he can/could read you and has lost that ability, and the second that dismisses this thought at Wisp "apparently bragging" (/being wrong).
Vote: General Johnny
weeeee~
Of the players here, Wisp and Rhand I believe have played with me the most (notice I said, most, not longest. That might be either Cantripmancer or Azrael for the honor). So when wisp is shading me for ignoring meta on KJ, when I am a verbal/constant both in games and outside of them about not using meta, I find it really odd that Rhand doesn't call it out, or that Wisp would use that angle to attack me. I think that point might actually lean more townwisp derping than wolfwisp shading since that's a very easy thing to disprove, but I didn't like it, nor did I find Rhand not calling out weird to me.
As far as trying to solve Wisp. What do I really have? He is basically saying my tone sounds fake. Ok....right then. As far as KJ is concerned, I am trying to solve him, but half the game is saying something about his meta, and some are going "it's too early to read him" and I just don't quite get it. Since the game is seemingly moving forward, I would rather see how KJ progresses and reassess from there, while also watching everyone else.
Your bolded posts are in two different areas. It's hard to tell with what Rhand is saying exactly, but I assumed his comment was shade on that I am sad wisp is wolf reading me. Objectively, he is wrong or a wolf. I like Wisp and solving with him, so I hope it's the former. You might not admit it, but I am sure there are players you like that you hope roll the same alignment as you. The 2nd bolded is calling out Rhand because he should be questioning that Wisp point, unless he doesn't want to interrupt Wisp line on me. The issue he has with Wisp/KJ, I don't full understand either.
Mostly though Sloth, I don't get why I get a vote when I am probably solving more than the rest of the game combined. But you do you.
There being a distinct lack of content in the last sixty-whatever posts is fine but half of the players being like "nah I'm just not gonna RVS" is
There's probably a wolf in the players who followed me onto Iso but I'm gonna town lean them all anyway
I had this thought as well, meaning one in {Silver, Rhand, Bur, Crops} - of these Crops seemed the flimsiest with the 'trend' comment.
Like, it's flimsy tho so
What do you mean by ? Is there some significance to RVS for you?
I already asked Silver for this, but might as wel ask you too:
Why? And why Crops?
I mean, the answer is already in the quote you have there: "of these Crops seemed the flimsiest with the 'trend' comment."
Longer answer is that Silver, Rhand and you had a lackadaisical approach to your votes to the tune of "haha, Iso, long time no see, let's vote you now since we haven't in forever" while he jumped in with a "I think I can get away with this, just following the mob" mentality. How do you view it?
His only other post only had one thing that would qualify as actual content and it was to piggyback on another again, agreeing with Tammy. It's not great, but tbf, there wasn't a whole lot to comment on (though definitely more than that).
There being a distinct lack of content in the last sixty-whatever posts is fine but half of the players being like "nah I'm just not gonna RVS" is
There's probably a wolf in the players who followed me onto Iso but I'm gonna town lean them all anyway
I had this thought as well, meaning one in {Silver, Rhand, Bur, Crops} - of these Crops seemed the flimsiest with the 'trend' comment.
Like, it's flimsy tho so
Nice scattershot. You realize that that statement is statistically true for any group of 4 players, right?
Also calling a RVS vote flimsy is funny.
I disagree with the math actually. 25% of the whole game is not the same as 1 in 4 random players is proabalby scum.
His grouping of 4 is not random, and I think you saying that its true for any 4 players is [some kind of logical fallacy (strawman? gamblers? maybe)] and isn't what he's actually saying.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
[spoiler=]maybe its still early, I am wondering if you actually believe that read on killjoy though, removing meta reads is kinda weird
I think the other case on Killjoy in regards to him talking about rvs and not joining it, has some more merit, but it's still up in the air
Thar be somethin' amiss here.
Why does GJ hope Wisp be town misreadin' 'im o'er catchin' 'im as mafia?
'n Wisp be natterin' about th' KillJoy cases as if they be part o' somethin' he ain't part o'.
I think something is amiss with you Rhandy boi.
The wisp part is that he apparently brags he can read me correctly in games past when we were both town.
Why aren't you calling him out on him being skeptical of me not metaing in KJ? You both are aware I don't regard meta almost, at all, and you are well aware of that, as is Wisp.
I think Rhand raises a good point about you preferring that he can't read you over you having caught scum.
I also don't see a strong attempt on you to figure out which of the two is it (misread or wolf) in your interactions with Wisp.
I am not a fan of how you deflected that line of questioning from him and switched to "why aren't you questioning him instead", brushing past the alternative of having caught him.
And lastly, the two underlined sections don't seem to match: One says that you believe he can/could read you and has lost that ability, and the second that dismisses this thought at Wisp "apparently bragging" (/being wrong).
Vote: General Johnny
weeeee~
Of the players here, Wisp and Rhand I believe have played with me the most (notice I said, most, not longest. That might be either Cantripmancer or Azrael for the honor). So when wisp is shading me for ignoring meta on KJ, when I am a verbal/constant both in games and outside of them about not using meta, I find it really odd that Rhand doesn't call it out, or that Wisp would use that angle to attack me. I think that point might actually lean more townwisp derping than wolfwisp shading since that's a very easy thing to disprove, but I didn't like it, nor did I find Rhand not calling out weird to me.
As far as trying to solve Wisp. What do I really have? He is basically saying my tone sounds fake. Ok....right then. As far as KJ is concerned, I am trying to solve him, but half the game is saying something about his meta, and some are going "it's too early to read him" and I just don't quite get it. Since the game is seemingly moving forward, I would rather see how KJ progresses and reassess from there, while also watching everyone else.
Your bolded posts are in two different areas. It's hard to tell with what Rhand is saying exactly, but I assumed his comment was shade on that I am sad wisp is wolf reading me. Objectively, he is wrong or a wolf. I like Wisp and solving with him, so I hope it's the former. You might not admit it, but I am sure there are players you like that you hope roll the same alignment as you. The 2nd bolded is calling out Rhand because he should be questioning that Wisp point, unless he doesn't want to interrupt Wisp line on me. The issue he has with Wisp/KJ, I don't full understand either.
Mostly though Sloth, I don't get why I get a vote when I am probably solving more than the rest of the game combined. But you do you.
Talk to me about how you're currently trying to solve me please.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I disagree with the math actually. 25% of the whole game is not the same as 1 in 4 random players is proabalby scum.
What? Yes it is.
If 25% of the game is scum and you pick players at random, you have a 25% chance with each pick that you'll hit scum. If you have a 25% chance 4 times, you are most likely to hit one scum and three townies. Certainly you are most likely to hit at least one scum, which is what he is saying.
His grouping of 4 is not random, and I think you saying that its true for any 4 players is [some kind of logical fallacy (strawman? gamblers? maybe)] and isn't what he's actually saying.
I realize his grouping is not random. But what he is saying is functionally as effective as picking players at random, and is therefor a useless statement.
GJ be town.
@GJ I be puttin' pressure on Wisp but that sentence didn' come through well. Me issue be that he seems t' be observin' th' KJ situation without wantin' t' be part o' it.
I disagree with the math actually. 25% of the whole game is not the same as 1 in 4 random players is proabalby scum.
What? Yes it is.
If 25% of the game is scum and you pick players at random, you have a 25% chance with each pick that you'll hit scum. If you have a 25% chance 4 times, you are most likely to hit one scum and three townies. Certainly you are most likely to hit at least one scum, which is what he is saying.
His grouping of 4 is not random, and I think you saying that its true for any 4 players is [some kind of logical fallacy (strawman? gamblers? maybe)] and isn't what he's actually saying.
I realize his grouping is not random. But what he is saying is functionally as effective as picking players at random, and is therefor a useless statement.
He's saying that one of the players following him onto Iso is likely scum. That's not random. It's presribing behavior analysis to a specific group. When a player stacks up RVS votes in a short amount of time, theres a >rand chance that one of those voters is scum following the crowd. It provides a "safety in numbers" buffer.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
What would you do if I told you you're wrong about that?
I didn't say it was towny? I just said "Bur knows what I'm thinking."
Ah. IDK if it's just a California thing but when someone "knows whats up" around here it means they're doing something good, or are correct in some kind of positive way.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I ***** about meta reads in almost every game I am in. This can't be a shocker.
I think Rhand is saying something about you seem to be hedging about KJ, or something about you talking about KJ without any actual interest in figuring out his alignment (based on the definition of natters).
Either way, this is where roleplay starts to piss me off. When communication starts to get harder due to a RP, it makes me want to tune it out of lynch it. I might add rhetoric to the tone of the masks I wear, and add emotion to the point that sometimes it's unbelievable, but you won't struggle to read my posts, short of grammatical errors.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
I am pretty sure the roleplay will die after today, but ya it does make it hard to interpret his posts, and it probably makes him look worse
Unvote, vote Cantripmancer
I already asked Silver for this, but might as wel ask you too:
Why? And why Crops?
Someone else will have to read Rhand for me, I'm not in love with the pirate flavor.
If I shade Iso, will he appear?
Can you remove the tin foil hat from your head so I can telepathically read your mind for why Cantrip is scum?
Plus Tammy and I are Masons.
You are a Cantrip apologizer.
That's a wide circle 3 pages in, with some almost close to 0 posters.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
Granted, it was completely wrong, but it did set me on the correct path eventually.
Bookmark this post.
I think Rhand raises a good point about you preferring that he can't read you over you having caught scum.
I also don't see a strong attempt on you to figure out which of the two is it (misread or wolf) in your interactions with Wisp.
I am not a fan of how you deflected that line of questioning from him and switched to "why aren't you questioning him instead", brushing past the alternative of having caught him.
And lastly, the two underlined sections don't seem to match: One says that you believe he can/could read you and has lost that ability, and the second that dismisses this thought at Wisp "apparently bragging" (/being wrong).
weeeee~
Only in my dreams do I get to dunk on Iso.
But yeah, the reason I asked is because the first three posts of the game weren't RVS and I'm fairly sure that's actually not happened in... years?
The reason I didn't RVS right then was... well because I just didn't.
... Can you explain the bolded part for me? TiA!
Vote: Gentleman Johnny
Nvm lol. I thought I voted Cantrip earlier but remember I held off on it.
Have him down the tho.
Also calling a RVS vote flimsy is funny.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
Longer answer is that Silver, Rhand and you had a lackadaisical approach to your votes to the tune of "haha, Iso, long time no see, let's vote you now since we haven't in forever" while he jumped in with a "I think I can get away with this, just following the mob" mentality. How do you view it?
His only other post only had one thing that would qualify as actual content and it was to piggyback on another again, agreeing with Tammy. It's not great, but tbf, there wasn't a whole lot to comment on (though definitely more than that).
And I already brought up the Snow White nonsense.
Okay, now I get what you are after, though I must say I read that post by Cantrip in "this is totez seriouz post" way
The GJ way path to no lynching:
Shush my honey, you are only strengthening Vaimes' Cantrip/Bur/GJ scum team and making sure CC joins us on his scum list
His grouping of 4 is not random, and I think you saying that its true for any 4 players is [some kind of logical fallacy (strawman? gamblers? maybe)] and isn't what he's actually saying.
Though, in reality, I'm inclined to think that one of them are just trying to suck up to CC. 128 specifically isn't much of anything.
What would you do if I told you you're wrong about that?
If 25% of the game is scum and you pick players at random, you have a 25% chance with each pick that you'll hit scum. If you have a 25% chance 4 times, you are most likely to hit one scum and three townies. Certainly you are most likely to hit at least one scum, which is what he is saying.
I realize his grouping is not random. But what he is saying is functionally as effective as picking players at random, and is therefor a useless statement.
Must... Resist... Temptation...
@GJ I be puttin' pressure on Wisp but that sentence didn' come through well. Me issue be that he seems t' be observin' th' KJ situation without wantin' t' be part o' it.
You think I'm lampshade hanging here?
Also, if someone wants a throughout course in how probabilities work, feel free to join my Math 5 course starting this Thursday