KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Attempts to game the setup with a cell block analysis seems suspicious to me, but with not much to go on I understand the sentiment. Just the idea of 'let's make this meta thing the topic' distracts from actual evaluation of posts and it's fluff. Within page one however it makes some sense. I would be much more suspicious if there was other evidence to go on.
But yeah, it's random per rules.
This post. It screams scum. He sees something to be suspicious of but understands it so it’s not suspicious but it would be if there were more posts.
It’s a bunch of awkward nothingness which is typical for early scum posts.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Did you really just say this?
I’m going to print that out a thousand times and use it as wallpaper for my bedroom lol.
That's a lot of printer ink.
What do you think of Tom?
Awaiting his response re:Vaimes.
Tom is easy to read though. If I die N1, he’s on the scum team.
If I don’t, then he’s not OR he couldn’t convince his buddies to shoot me.
Did you really just say this?
I’m going to print that out a thousand times and use it as wallpaper for my bedroom lol.
That's a lot of printer ink.
What do you think of Tom?
Awaiting his response re:Vaimes.
Tom is easy to read though. If I die N1, he’s on the scum team.
If I don’t, then he’s not OR he couldn’t convince his buddies to shoot me.
I'm not sure that's a reliable meter of Tom's alignment.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Lol Rhand. What do you want me to do? I think we're getting to a substantive spot. Admittedly nothing to go after right now, give it time. I only ask you let me do my thing when the thread gets juicy, and evaluate me based on that.
Scratching the days into the walls, then my toothbrush shiv was confiscated. It's easy to lose count in here.
My lawyer is a straight busta; I'm gonna be hitting the books soon. Defend myself. You got to around the cell blocks, too. Early on the inmates form into tribes. It gives you somewhere to belong. Protection. But it ain't been that easy for me. But the folks I come to know, the true ride-or-die, I'll fight for them. One of my cellmates seems cool, but the other one just silent. Must be trippin'.
I think maybe if I can get a job, in the garden or workin' the kitchen, I'll be outta here in like 2-3 years tops on good behavior. If someone don't start some ***** first, or I end up bleeding out in medical. Just gotta keep my head down, do the work, and the parole officer will surely notice. I ain't a killer like some of these folks.
If I was some rich dude I'da been chillin' in a hot tub, under 'supervision'. Like Pablo Escobar or some *****. Yeeah, I can see it now. Smokin' a fat cigar, good lookin' ladies bringin' me drinks.
That's the prison we should be in, man. Imma look into some prison reform after all this. Livin' like rats in a cage right now. Fightin' over scraps. Gotta eat with your elbows out or somebody gonna snatch up your food. Then you get weak, easy to push around. Nah, not me. I ain't goin' out like that.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Interesting that Lastwhisper isn't mentioned in regards to "joke" posts, @FlargBlarg. Especially since you did mention a run-away vote train on LW is beneficial to you for reads. Why does LW get a pass?
Doubling down now, I see. Anyone else wanna see where this goes? Vote Lastwhisper
Apperently I quoted the wrong posts before.
So I suppose my question wasn't clear enough. I noted from these two posts that in response to something that could potentially be scummy came immediate and kind of aggressive suspicion. Is this typical for you?
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Lol Rhand. What do you want me to do? I think we're getting to a substantive spot. Admittedly nothing to go after right now, give it time. I only ask you let me do my thing when the thread gets juicy, and evaluate me based on that.
Well yes, obviously I will (re)evaluate you with what you post. It’s not like you’re going to get lynched off my one vote.
Attempts to game the setup with a cell block analysis seems suspicious to me, but with not much to go on I understand the sentiment. Just the idea of 'let's make this meta thing the topic' distracts from actual evaluation of posts and it's fluff. Within page one however it makes some sense. I would be much more suspicious if there was other evidence to go on.
But yeah, it's random per rules.
This post. It screams scum. He sees something to be suspicious of but understands it so it’s not suspicious but it would be if there were more posts.
It’s a bunch of awkward nothingness which is typical for early scum posts.
interesting
I read it as "excitedly premature" and that feels towny to me
Did you really just say this?
I’m going to print that out a thousand times and use it as wallpaper for my bedroom lol.
That's a lot of printer ink.
What do you think of Tom?
Awaiting his response re:Vaimes.
Tom is easy to read though. If I die N1, he’s on the scum team.
If I don’t, then he’s not OR he couldn’t convince his buddies to shoot me.
I'm not sure that's a reliable meter of Tom's alignment.
probably not over time, but i have historically killed rhand pretty early as scum.
interesting
I read it as "excitedly premature" and that feels towny to me
Your homework is to underline the sentence that conveys any sort of excitement.
its not about a sentence using "excited" diction. Its about an approach.
In that post rhand quoted hes talking about tells that likely arent real during RVS stage. He basically listened to me about backing off last but expressed he didnt have anything else to do.
That is someone <excited> for this game to get going so he can solve it. As rhand said it does feel like a rusty player. Which i also just... know to be true.
But based on "rusty" it feels like hes tilting at windmills to get loose, not like hes "just doing stuff to shake off the rust"
Which is a subtle difference but i think im into it
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
interesting
I read it as "excitedly premature" and that feels towny to me
Your homework is to underline the sentence that conveys any sort of excitement.
its not about a sentence using "excited" diction. Its about an approach.
In that post rhand quoted hes talking about tells that likely arent real during RVS stage. He basically listened to me about backing off last but expressed he didnt have anything else to do.
That is someone <excited> for this game to get going so he can solve it. As rhand said it does feel like a rusty player. Which i also just... know to be true.
But based on "rusty" it feels like hes tilting at windmills to get loose, not like hes "just doing stuff to shake off the rust"
Which is a subtle difference but i think im into it
This is certainly one take on it.
Oooh this game is getting spicy already.
Who hasn't shown up yet? GJ, Jackarito, randomletterman?
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Vote: KJ
I wasn't aware. I wish I had a mustache to twirl. I was planning on doing Prison RP but decided it was gonna be too much work.
If I had to have a town read it would be Flarg. His interest and activity feel natural.
@Redacted nice reaction test.
I jsut wanna sit here and post. This is weird.
Can you please stop doing that VAIMES thing? It’s kind of old
And then for the real vote
vote Zionite for being rusty scum.
This post. It screams scum. He sees something to be suspicious of but understands it so it’s not suspicious but it would be if there were more posts.
It’s a bunch of awkward nothingness which is typical for early scum posts.
What did Vaimes do? i’m not seeing it.
Also, half rvs? Eww.
Did you really just say this?
I’m going to print that out a thousand times and use it as wallpaper for my bedroom lol.
What do you think of Tom?
Describe the personality you were trying to rp?
Awaiting his response re:Vaimes.
Tom is easy to read though. If I die N1, he’s on the scum team.
If I don’t, then he’s not OR he couldn’t convince his buddies to shoot me.
Scratching the days into the walls, then my toothbrush shiv was confiscated. It's easy to lose count in here.
My lawyer is a straight busta; I'm gonna be hitting the books soon. Defend myself. You got to around the cell blocks, too. Early on the inmates form into tribes. It gives you somewhere to belong. Protection. But it ain't been that easy for me. But the folks I come to know, the true ride-or-die, I'll fight for them. One of my cellmates seems cool, but the other one just silent. Must be trippin'.
I think maybe if I can get a job, in the garden or workin' the kitchen, I'll be outta here in like 2-3 years tops on good behavior. If someone don't start some ***** first, or I end up bleeding out in medical. Just gotta keep my head down, do the work, and the parole officer will surely notice. I ain't a killer like some of these folks.
If I was some rich dude I'da been chillin' in a hot tub, under 'supervision'. Like Pablo Escobar or some *****. Yeeah, I can see it now. Smokin' a fat cigar, good lookin' ladies bringin' me drinks.
That's the prison we should be in, man. Imma look into some prison reform after all this. Livin' like rats in a cage right now. Fightin' over scraps. Gotta eat with your elbows out or somebody gonna snatch up your food. Then you get weak, easy to push around. Nah, not me. I ain't goin' out like that.
But that brings us back to this not actually being an answer to my question in that case.
So I suppose my question wasn't clear enough. I noted from these two posts that in response to something that could potentially be scummy came immediate and kind of aggressive suspicion. Is this typical for you?
Well yes, obviously I will (re)evaluate you with what you post. It’s not like you’re going to get lynched off my one vote.
I was seriously going to flip my lid if somebody didn’t mention my avatar at some point.
I read it as "excitedly premature" and that feels towny to me
Did you roll scum?
Whats eww about it to you?
Do you like that post because you agree or because you like rhand being ~suspicious of me?
If you agree why didnt you say anything?
If you just like him pushing me do you think it will help you determine one of our alignments?
I'm in this game too though
You're always my first shot if you survive D1
In that post rhand quoted hes talking about tells that likely arent real during RVS stage. He basically listened to me about backing off last but expressed he didnt have anything else to do.
That is someone <excited> for this game to get going so he can solve it. As rhand said it does feel like a rusty player. Which i also just... know to be true.
But based on "rusty" it feels like hes tilting at windmills to get loose, not like hes "just doing stuff to shake off the rust"
Which is a subtle difference but i think im into it
A little of both.
I noted it.
It can't hurt.
What about Zionite's post reads as excited?
You may live.
Killjoy (2): Tubba Fett, Grapefuit21
Vaimes (2): Lastwhisper, Tomsloger
KittyCupCake (1): Vaimes
YWFMLF (1): Slothful
Jackrito (1): KittyCupCake
Lastwhisper (1): FlargBlarg
Zionite (1): Rhand
Not Voting (6): YWFMLF, Gentleman Johnny, Jackrito, ZeDorkSlipeur, Killjoy, Zionite
With 15 alive it takes 8 to lynch. Deadline is March 3rd at 1700 MST.
Killjoy probably town!killjoy based off last game
That's about how confident I am right now
Oooh this game is getting spicy already.
Who hasn't shown up yet? GJ, Jackarito, randomletterman?