Laughing With the Comedian
3. Rhand, Ozymandias (Adrian Veidt), Vanilla Town — Lynched D1
1. Killjoy, Dr Malcolm Long, Vanilla Town — Killed N1
Waiting in Archie (Replacements)
1. Silvercrys3467
Watching the Watchmen (Spectators)
1. Vaimes
2. Sepiriel
0. Don't be a dick.
1. You know how mafia works.
2. Days will be 7/6/5 days in length depending on living players, stopping at 5 days.
3. Nights will be 2 nights long until there's only one scum remaining, at which point we'll go to 24 hour Nights.
4. PM me (here or (preferably) on Discord; look for "meg" in the MTGS mafia server to find me) with questions!
Setup
1x Town Hyper Watcher (Can't target the same player two Nights in a row.)
4x Town Vanilla
2x Mafia Goon
The first time the Hyper Watcher dies, one living Town Vanilla is selected at random to be a Hyper Watcher (the new Watcher can target the same player the previous Watcher targeted the previous Night).
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
@KJ: I get that a lot. Out of curiosity, despite the rather low amount of posts, has anything stuck out to you?
Not really. Like if I squint and multiply things by ten, I can say you making that conga vote is "trying to blend in" and Cantrip's conga breaker is going against the grain.
But the actual end of those sentences is just "I guess".
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Also Tom: Why do you think I'm role hunting? You seem to think that I'm looking for the Watcher, and voted him in RVS. I feel like there's something in that logic that's either premature or was not there to begin with.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
(That was more a joke that youve never *really* been right)
ah. True enough I suppose.
Normally I'd just ignore you and wait for you to either die or have enough people interactions with you to figure you out, but this game is pretty short. Probably won't have enough time.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
@KCC: why? If you’re wanting more meta of me, there is plenty, I’ve been in more games than not for the past few years.
It's not the same. I guess it's more that I wish I had engaged with you more while you were there, rather than just ignoring you until Modern finished, then not getting any chance
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
VOTE COUNT 1.1 "Half-blind; half-dead; wholly deranged by agony; the yellow leviathan attempted to swim away, dragging my raft in its bloody wake"
Tubba Fett (2): KCC, tom
KCC (1): Rhand
Rhand (1): Shadowlancer
tom (1): Cantripmancer
MOD NOTES:
When voting, please vote on a new line! For this game, you do not need to unvote; a vote for a different player than the one you are currently voting will cause you to move your vote to that player.
Deadline will be 11:59PM Eastern on Friday, 15 Nov.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Can we have Megiddo removed from the forum forever please?
i'm pretty sure i can find your ***** online within 3 minutes
@KCC
I typically don’t vote, at least not with any seriousness early in the game. Early game is one of my many weaknesses, and I tend to watch from the background and see what happens. It’s entirely passive and I need to work on shaking the habit.
@KCC
I typically don’t vote, at least not with any seriousness early in the game. Early game is one of my many weaknesses, and I tend to watch from the background and see what happens. It’s entirely passive and I need to work on shaking the habit.
I see you didn't vote in Hill either. Okay
If you are going to shake the habit, now is a great time to start. There isn't much background to sit in with only 7 players
Watchmen Wanted
An Open Micro for 7 Players
Presumably Superheroes (5/7)
2. KittyCupCake
4. Cantripmancer
5. shadowlancerx
6. tomsloger
7. Tubba Fett
Laughing With the Comedian
3. Rhand, Ozymandias (Adrian Veidt), Vanilla Town — Lynched D1
1. Killjoy, Dr Malcolm Long, Vanilla Town — Killed N1
Waiting in Archie (Replacements)
1. Silvercrys3467
Watching the Watchmen (Spectators)
1. Vaimes
2. Sepiriel
1. You know how mafia works.
2. Days will be 7/6/5 days in length depending on living players, stopping at 5 days.
3. Nights will be 2 nights long until there's only one scum remaining, at which point we'll go to 24 hour Nights.
4. PM me (here or (preferably) on Discord; look for "meg" in the MTGS mafia server to find me) with questions!
1x Town Hyper Watcher (Can't target the same player two Nights in a row.)
4x Town Vanilla
2x Mafia Goon
The first time the Hyper Watcher dies, one living Town Vanilla is selected at random to be a Hyper Watcher (the new Watcher can target the same player the previous Watcher targeted the previous Night).
Start of D2
I will start the game when I have at least 4 confirms. Please don't post yet.
It is now Day one!
I’ll edit the thread with deadline and maybe some flavor when i’m not on mobile
C-C-Conga breaker!!
That's a good strategy if you're town, and a better strategy if scum
It's fine, just get rid of the Cant and become Ripmancer
I just got the weirdest feeling of deja vu.
As always, I may be a little light in participation over the weekend. Sorry, especially since it's shorter phases.
@KJ: I get that a lot. Out of curiosity, despite the rather low amount of posts, has anything stuck out to you?
Would that be like a fart magician? Or a death magician?
Why not both? Yeah, for you. -I really wish you had had a chance to post more in Eurovision
Ok, we’re like best friends now
Eurovision was a bummer though, only time I’ve ever replaced.
But the actual end of those sentences is just "I guess".
For missing the giant blinking sign over shadow saying "im the watcher"
[Tom Shadow] world possible.
Aside: no one's got the reference yet.
Normally I'd just ignore you and wait for you to either die or have enough people interactions with you to figure you out, but this game is pretty short. Probably won't have enough time.
I think the right approach is just townread me for now then brutally turn on me in lylo
As much, as often, and as eloquently as you like.
You did place a RVS vote, which is very un-you
Yay!
Any reason you haven't voted, btw?
It's not the same. I guess it's more that I wish I had engaged with you more while you were there, rather than just ignoring you until Modern finished, then not getting any chance
I guess that's another possibility, but why bring that up?
Tom/KJ unaligned. KCC/Tubba also unaligned.
@KCC: we’ll just have to make up for it this game
Impress me
@Shadow: Do you see anything noteworthy right now?
"Half-blind; half-dead; wholly deranged by agony; the yellow leviathan attempted to swim away, dragging my raft in its bloody wake"
Tubba Fett (2): KCC, tom
KCC (1): Rhand
Rhand (1): Shadowlancer
tom (1): Cantripmancer
MOD NOTES:
When voting, please vote on a new line! For this game, you do not need to unvote; a vote for a different player than the one you are currently voting will cause you to move your vote to that player.
Deadline will be 11:59PM Eastern on Friday, 15 Nov.
I’ve lost 8lbs. on my new diet and exercise regime. Looking to change my name to Not-So-TubbaFett.
I typically don’t vote, at least not with any seriousness early in the game. Early game is one of my many weaknesses, and I tend to watch from the background and see what happens. It’s entirely passive and I need to work on shaking the habit.
I see you didn't vote in Hill either. Okay
If you are going to shake the habit, now is a great time to start. There isn't much background to sit in with only 7 players
I doubt he sees it this way and probably no one else should either but my attitude is sorta "momma hawk watching him hunt on his own"