Quote from fulcrum »You are the worst towmcheck I have ever had
Quote from Grapefruit21 »And I'm permanently paranoid about getting pocketed. Our fearless moderator has a lot to do with that...
Quote from Killjoy »KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Quote from LnGrrrR »@Cantrip, first game. And every mission with you failing would be a good indicator you were an informant.
Also, I was thinking of the numbers, and this game feels like it will be super hard to win as the robbers.
Finally I want to answer KJ'S question because I think it's a good conversation for town at large. (Also, I am next and could use some experienced voices.)
I guess the easiest option is that if a team passes, to keep picking the same team. A second strategy might be to get the widest spread of possible players on each team.
Quote from LnGrrrR »Also, re what KJ said about flavor, I will probably discuss the missions using flavor to, and discuss how my flavor would "help" the mission for funsies.
Speaking of flavor, since we don't have flips or anything, does it matter if we share? Are there roles like mafia that might affect it?
Quote from Cantripmancer »@KJ: Fun fact: I was originally going to help Grape write flavor for this, but I got lazy. As to your question: Why wouldn't I put myself on the mission? (Yes, that's a serious question.) I know I can trust me; that reduces the variables. I was sorta bummed that Grape put that allowance in, as I think it's more interesting if you can't just pick yourself. But I'm not going to throw that advantage away on principle.
Quote from LnGrrrR »@KJ, I don't know. It feel likes it would be easy for the informants to win. Just one "fail" loses a mission, and there are three informants. Theoretically, each of them can just vote fail on any of the missions (besides 4). I guess it is one of those things I will figure out as we play.
Quote from shadowlancerx »I motion that we send people on the first mission based solely on making it make sense flavorfully!
(Not serious, but sort of serious )
Quote from Rhand »Since the hacker and brains usually don’t join in the field, I’m all alone so far
Quote from LnGrrrR »And wait, how is a hacker getting you past security as opposed to a con man/false persona guy?
Quote from Lastwhisper »@shadow
Well I don't like KJ so far, nothing else pings me as of yet
Quote from LnGrrrR »KJ, if you are going to speak Bahstahn, you need to throw a few "wickeds" in there. Like wicked awesome or wicked killah. A few fahks probably couldn't hurt eithah, ya know? (Also, only the southiest people wouldn't pronounce the r in first
Quote from shadowlancerx »Quote from LnGrrrR »And wait, how is a hacker getting you past security as opposed to a con man/false persona guy? Psh, you put on a wig and a fake outfit to get past the camera, I break into the network and loop the camera on itself. When the feds come looking, you tell me which is more likely to throw them off.
Who would you send?
Quote from Rhand »Derping lngr often means town.
Quote from LnGrrrR »Note to self: Be more derpy as scum.