I'm aware that what i quoted is not your entire case but it the basis and what I wanted to highlight in relation to prophs comment. You even say it again in your post "you did so by giving a bunch of one-liners that did not add anything new or meaningful to the case" while proph said "He's voting him for a different reason"
I understood what Proph was saying as you were presenting your points as though they were different reasons so as not to appear to just be barning, rather than just barning the case, which gets at the same idea as my point about you posting one-liners without adding new or meaningful content.
The quote he posted when he said that was your response to BE's #82, which was the most criticized post by other players and was the post that triggered Meggido and Kosa's votes, so that's definitely not an example of a new point you were making. I thought that he was saying that you were making the same point they were but trying to present it in a different way so that it looked better for your vote. Otherwise, his point would have been that it's scummy to add new content to a case generally, which doesn't make sense.
Also, if that last point is the point that you think he was making, why didn't you push him about that rather than asking me? That should be something that you drill him on because he would be saying that adding any new actual content to a case is scummy, which would be ridiculous.
I feel like your focus is more trying to get out of this case as opposed to genuinely questioning it, and I think more people should be voting for you.
I hadn't refreshed in ~15 minutes, so there are posts in between.
Ah, alright.
Quote from Odd iGem »
b) "No more jokes" was a joke - it seems like that should be obvious given the few posts after that one.
Really? I didn't interpret it as such.
More to the point, what are you doing? I've looked at your posts and 60% of them are fluff, with the other 40% of them pushing and prodding Burning Earth.
No reaction to his claim + my defense? No thoughts on the other players in the thread?
Why did you respond to my accusations about you immediately and not to DCIII's?
After closely reading oddigem, I would like to agree with this post and also
Offering additional arguments to vote someone even when the case/evidence has proven itself adequate enough is scummy, because you want to appear as if you are not barning.
But DCIII's case on me is based on my barning and not adding anything. Which is what I wanted a comment on.
I feel like DCIII covered it pretty well, but your second post IIRC was not adding much - just a bunch of weak one-liners. Heck, you never even followed up on your questions to Burning_Earth.
You're not in a Basic game anymore, BE. You're playing with the big kids now.
What is the purpose of this post except for aggravating me?
To let you know that you will be seeing more advance game playing in this game rather than the play you saw in your Basic games. I was trying to be funny with that comment, albeit just a little funny, but
More to the point, what are you doing? I've looked at your posts and 60% of them are fluff, with the other 40% of them pushing and prodding Burning Earth.
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
No reaction to his claim + my defense? No thoughts on the other players in the thread?
Not at the time. I have more to add, but have poor weekend availability to post. I can still read intermittently, though, and given that you misconstrued my posts, I found it important to post on it. I usually save my larger posts for early in the week.
Why did you respond to my accusations about you immediately and not to DCIII's?
Because you posted accusations and he posted more generalized thoughts. There was no need to respond to his post. That said, since it's something others have posted on, there's a difference between "testing the waters" and "waiting to see reactions". B_E's reactions were horrible.
-------------
In other news, based on rezombied's weird late vote on Megiddo "for no reason" and Megiddo initially dismissing votes/cases on rezombied out of hand, I wouldn't be surprised if rezombied being scum meaning Megiddo is also scum.
I can dig DCIII's stuff on rezombied. Not sold on B_E as town, but his posts over the past day or two have been better.
I don't have any hard numbers on this, but I'm targeted more often than a black guy driving a beat-up sedan with a broken tail-light and no license plate, and Cy's well aware of that.
@DCIII:
You mentioned that you believe that Scum are pushing the BE wagon, but then label your Scum reads as Zed (who did not push BE until later) and Odd iGem, who didn't start the wagon either, but "tested the waters" as you put it.
Looking back at the postings from Odd iGem and can safely say that he did not push the wagon nearly as much as others.
Wouldn't this make perfect sense for a bus? Not really worth delving into until we have one or the other's flip, but worth noting.
@dkingsland:
I don't believe you mean "bus" there. It would be distracting/counter wagon effort since DCIII went in a different direction than the current wagon.
... Unless you mean the player that DCII voted back then is the bus, but that wouldn't make sense for a Scum buddy to randomly bus at the particular moment.
You're not in a Basic game anymore, BE. You're playing with the big kids now.
What is the purpose of this post except for aggravating me?
To let you know that you will be seeing more advance game playing in this game rather than the play you saw in your Basic games. I was trying to be funny with that comment, albeit just a little funny, but
More to the point, what are you doing? I've looked at your posts and 60% of them are fluff, with the other 40% of them pushing and prodding Burning Earth.
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
No reaction to his claim + my defense? No thoughts on the other players in the thread?
Not at the time. I have more to add, but have poor weekend availability to post. I can still read intermittently, though, and given that you misconstrued my posts, I found it important to post on it. I usually save my larger posts for early in the week.
Why did you respond to my accusations about you immediately and not to DCIII's?
Because you posted accusations and he posted more generalized thoughts. There was no need to respond to his post. That said, since it's something others have posted on, there's a difference between "testing the waters" and "waiting to see reactions". B_E's reactions were horrible.
-------------
In other news, based on rezombied's weird late vote on Megiddo "for no reason" and Megiddo initially dismissing votes/cases on rezombied out of hand, I wouldn't be surprised if rezombied being scum meaning Megiddo is also scum.
I can dig DCIII's stuff on rezombied. Not sold on B_E as town, but his posts over the past day or two have been better.
Unvote
Vote rezombied[/QUOTE]
First: Yes it is entirely reasonable to 'harp on about' the quality of your posts. You have clearly been active enough to post real content but you haven't.
Second: the unvote and Rez vote is horrible. You provide no new reasons, just vote with the momentum of the game. What about my posts have been better?
@B_E
If you could refrain from making one line posts for things like spelling mistakes it would be appreciated. There are a rather lot of those, and they're hard to read through on a phone =]
I'm aware that what i quoted is not your entire case but it the basis and what I wanted to highlight in relation to prophs comment. You even say it again in your post "you did so by giving a bunch of one-liners that did not add anything new or meaningful to the case" while proph said "He's voting him for a different reason"
Why do you not just respond to the case instead of arguing over someone else's interpretation of it?
@MOD
I will be going overseas from 22nd of Jan - 3rd Feb so expect vla during that time.
I -should- have internet at my hotel so I'll be following/posting as best I can during that time.
@MOD
I will be going overseas from 22nd of Jan - 3rd Feb so expect vla during that time.
I -should- have internet at my hotel so I'll be following/posting as best I can during that time.
Because I wanted to vote for Megiddo, and I wanted to RVS, and I wanted to try to get a reaction, which I did.
Sorry, not buying it. RVS was long dead, so if you wanted to get a reaction out of Meg, there were other ways to go about it. I have an issue with the mindset of trying to goad Meg with an RVS post RVS. Why not just analyse his posts up to that point and point out whatever issue(s) you had with them? It looks, to me, like you are trying to be productive without actually being productive.
Vote: Rezombied
I don't like the way you have responded to DC or Proph, and your recklessness in putting BE to L-1 just screams scum to me.
I don't have any hard numbers on this, but I'm targeted more often than a black guy driving a beat-up sedan with a broken tail-light and no license plate, and Cy's well aware of that.
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
It is actually. You have twice as many posts as I do and all of them are garbage.
Condense yourself. I forbid you to double post for the rest of the game. If you do I will get you lynched no matter what anybody else says, does, or thinks. The brakes will be cut. You will die.
Second: the unvote and Rez vote is horrible. You provide no new reasons, just vote with the momentum of the game. What about my posts have been better?
please tell me why this indicates scum motivation to you
I'm aware that what i quoted is not your entire case but it the basis and what I wanted to highlight in relation to prophs comment. You even say it again in your post "you did so by giving a bunch of one-liners that did not add anything new or meaningful to the case" while proph said "He's voting him for a different reason"
Why do you not just respond to the case instead of arguing over someone else's interpretation of it?
I like you
I'm being swayed on rezombied though. I support pressure on him. We can revisit BE later.
mod: VC please
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Can we have Megiddo removed from the forum forever please?
i'm pretty sure i can find your ***** online within 3 minutes
Also, if that last point is the point that you think he was making, why didn't you push him about that rather than asking me? That should be something that you drill him on because he would be saying that adding any new actual content to a case is scummy, which would be ridiculous.
I have asked him about it, except he has been evasive.
I feel like your focus is more trying to get out of this case as opposed to genuinely questioning it, and I think more people should be voting for you.
I understand your case against me. It makes sense, except for the part about me 'jumping on the easy wagon'. I came in to about 7 pages of game having been played and voted for who I thought was scum.
I feel like DCIII covered it pretty well, but your second post IIRC was not adding much - just a bunch of weak one-liners. Heck, you never even followed up on your questions to Burning_Earth.
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
It is actually. You have twice as many posts as I do and all of them are garbage.
Condense yourself. I forbid you to double post for the rest of the game. If you do I will get you lynched no matter what anybody else says, does, or thinks. The brakes will be cut. You will die.
Second: the unvote and Rez vote is horrible. You provide no new reasons, just vote with the momentum of the game. What about my posts have been better?
please tell me why this indicates scum motivation to you
A: oddigem said that, not me:). Also, I have not only been posting fluff.
B: I think odd is going off my mislynch wagon and voting for the newer and possibly easier one.
Or I've legitimately been busy, and some of those posts also had follow-up content. That said, the vote is understandable, given that I haven't delivered on my promises.
You're not in a Basic game anymore, BE. You're playing with the big kids now.
What is the purpose of this post except for aggravating me?
To let you know that you will be seeing more advance game playing in this game rather than the play you saw in your Basic games. I was trying to be funny with that comment, albeit just a little funny, but
More to the point, what are you doing? I've looked at your posts and 60% of them are fluff, with the other 40% of them pushing and prodding Burning Earth.
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
No reaction to his claim + my defense? No thoughts on the other players in the thread?
Not at the time. I have more to add, but have poor weekend availability to post. I can still read intermittently, though, and given that you misconstrued my posts, I found it important to post on it. I usually save my larger posts for early in the week.
Why did you respond to my accusations about you immediately and not to DCIII's?
Because you posted accusations and he posted more generalized thoughts. There was no need to respond to his post. That said, since it's something others have posted on, there's a difference between "testing the waters" and "waiting to see reactions". B_E's reactions were horrible.
-------------
In other news, based on rezombied's weird late vote on Megiddo "for no reason" and Megiddo initially dismissing votes/cases on rezombied out of hand, I wouldn't be surprised if rezombied being scum meaning Megiddo is also scum.
I can dig DCIII's stuff on rezombied. Not sold on B_E as town, but his posts over the past day or two have been better.
Unvote
Vote rezombied
First: Yes it is entirely reasonable to 'harp on about' the quality of your posts. You have clearly been active enough to post real content but you haven't.
Second: the unvote and Rez vote is horrible. You provide no new reasons, just vote with the momentum of the game. What about my posts have been better?
Fixed my quote fail. There should have been a [/spoiler] tag instead of the quote one.
First: I'm not saying I couldn't post real content. I'm asking what the issue with levity in the first 48 hours of a game is.
Second: Does everyone have to provide reasons to join a wagon? I'm not going to try to invent my own reasons to join a wagon if the reasons that I'm joining a wagon are legitimate existing reasons that have already been stated in thread. How much new reasoning did you provide when you voted me?
As far as your posts are concerned, I could have sworn that you had gotten less defensive and were actually proactive about things, but upon going back and reviewing, I appear to have imagined that. I rescind my previous statement.
I still support a rezombied lynch over yours, though.
~Mod note: I'm (still) experimenting a bit with the votecount format. If it gets too obnoxious or there's some iota of information that you want that I'm not providing, let me know and I'll work it in. Need to find a style that works for me, after all
I don't have any hard numbers on this, but I'm targeted more often than a black guy driving a beat-up sedan with a broken tail-light and no license plate, and Cy's well aware of that.
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
It is actually. You have twice as many posts as I do and all of them are garbage.
Condense yourself. I forbid you to double post for the rest of the game. If you do I will get you lynched no matter what anybody else says, does, or thinks. The brakes will be cut. You will die.
This part was misattributed to me, but your assessment is based on the quality and quantity of his posts. My posts have been brief, but there was a point to them. If you consider them garbage, ok. The rest of this doesn't really apply to me.
I explained my vote for Megiddo. Go read the game.
-----
I am Jynx Salamand, Town Neighbor
I am a 1st-year apprentice with no master. I have joined a club -- something about a Cult of Al-Naxys. We mostly sit around and play some D&D knockoff, but one member takes the game pretty seriously.
As B_E has stated, we have a qt that we can post in at any time.
-----
There was some stuff that B_E posted in our qt that, in addition to things in the thread made me believe he was scum. That's why I said the case against me made sense, because I wasn't able to say "hey, b_e and I are neighbors and I think he might be scum because of some **** he said in our QT"
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
It is actually. You have twice as many posts as I do and all of them are garbage.
Condense yourself. I forbid you to double post for the rest of the game. If you do I will get you lynched no matter what anybody else says, does, or thinks. The brakes will be cut. You will die.
This part was misattributed to me, but your assessment is based on the quality and quantity of his posts. My posts have been brief, but there was a point to them. If you consider them garbage, ok. The rest of this doesn't really apply to me.
When does the game begin for you? Should we ignore every post made in the first 48 hours of the game because they 'might not [have gotten] straight down to business'?
When does the game begin for you? Should we ignore every post made in the first 48 hours of the game because they 'might not [have gotten] straight down to business'?
This is nice.
And also not at all what I said. There's a big difference between "ignoring every post [a player] has made in the first [span of time]" and expecting there to be some difference in how quickly each player gets down to business.
When does the game begin for you? Should we ignore every post made in the first 48 hours of the game because they 'might not [have gotten] straight down to business'?
This is nice.
And also not at all what I said. There's a big difference between "ignoring every post [a player] has made in the first [span of time]" and expecting there to be some difference in how quickly each player gets down to business.
When does the game begin for you? Should we ignore every post made in the first 48 hours of the game because they 'might not [have gotten] straight down to business'?
This is nice.
And also not at all what I said. There's a big difference between "ignoring every post [a player] has made in the first [span of time]" and expecting there to be some difference in how quickly each player gets down to business.
Define getting down to business for me.
No. It's irrelevant. Do you not understand the difference between the two statements?
Also, if that last point is the point that you think he was making, why didn't you push him about that rather than asking me? That should be something that you drill him on because he would be saying that adding any new actual content to a case is scummy, which would be ridiculous.
I have asked him about it, except he has been evasive.
If you thought Proph was being evasive, why wouldn't you continue to press him on it more and highlight that rather than asking me about his views? Especially if you really thought that he was saying that adding any new information to a case was scummy, because that would be a stance to really press. So, I doubt that you actually thought that was his stance.
I am a 1st-year apprentice with no master. I have joined a club -- something about a Cult of Al-Naxys. We mostly sit around and play some D&D knockoff, but one member takes the game pretty seriously.
As B_E has stated, we have a qt that we can post in at any time.
-----
There was some stuff that B_E posted in our qt that, in addition to things in the thread made me believe he was scum. That's why I said the case against me made sense, because I wasn't able to say "hey, b_e and I are neighbors and I think he might be scum because of some **** he said in our QT"
Unvote Vote Prophylaxis
Then, you spend your claim post saying that you think BE is scum because of stuff he posted in your neighbor QT, but then you switch your vote to Proph. I think that you're trying to cover for the inconsistency of your stance on Proph now without backing down from your vote on BE.
I'd like to see what Void, Tube, and Kosa have to say when they catch up and then I'd like to consolidate my reads, but I'm convinced that you should be the lynch Today.
As far as your posts are concerned, I could have sworn that you had gotten less defensive and were actually proactive about things, but upon going back and reviewing, I appear to have imagined that. I rescind my previous statement.
I don't like this response either. Several people have switched their intentions from BE indicating that they think that Rez is more scummy. You indicated that BE looked better to you from his recent posting, which stood out to me because I didn't see much difference in what BE was doing.
So then, when pressed about it, you say that you imagined his posts improving and go back to expressing suspicion of BE. I'd think that you would have had something concrete that would have made you feel better about BE's posting to say so since you were voting him earlier. I think that you were feeling pressure for being on the BE wagon and wanted to give a reason for leaving it.
I understood what Proph was saying as you were presenting your points as though they were different reasons so as not to appear to just be barning, rather than just barning the case, which gets at the same idea as my point about you posting one-liners without adding new or meaningful content.
The quote he posted when he said that was your response to BE's #82, which was the most criticized post by other players and was the post that triggered Meggido and Kosa's votes, so that's definitely not an example of a new point you were making. I thought that he was saying that you were making the same point they were but trying to present it in a different way so that it looked better for your vote. Otherwise, his point would have been that it's scummy to add new content to a case generally, which doesn't make sense.
Also, if that last point is the point that you think he was making, why didn't you push him about that rather than asking me? That should be something that you drill him on because he would be saying that adding any new actual content to a case is scummy, which would be ridiculous.
I feel like your focus is more trying to get out of this case as opposed to genuinely questioning it, and I think more people should be voting for you.
Town Win % = 75%
Mafia Win % = 75%
Overall Win % = 75%
Completed Game Log
2014: Best Mafia Performance (Group)
2014: Most Improved Player
2014: Best Town Player
2014: Best Overall Player
After closely reading oddigem, I would like to agree with this post and also
vote oddigem
Okay.
I feel like DCIII covered it pretty well, but your second post IIRC was not adding much - just a bunch of weak one-liners. Heck, you never even followed up on your questions to Burning_Earth.
@Meg
What are your thoughts on Odd iGem?
What part of:
[spoiler]
[/quote]
doesn't sound like more jokes? I thought my tone was pretty clear, but
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
Not at the time. I have more to add, but have poor weekend availability to post. I can still read intermittently, though, and given that you misconstrued my posts, I found it important to post on it. I usually save my larger posts for early in the week.
Because you posted accusations and he posted more generalized thoughts. There was no need to respond to his post. That said, since it's something others have posted on, there's a difference between "testing the waters" and "waiting to see reactions". B_E's reactions were horrible.
-------------
In other news, based on rezombied's weird late vote on Megiddo "for no reason" and Megiddo initially dismissing votes/cases on rezombied out of hand, I wouldn't be surprised if rezombied being scum meaning Megiddo is also scum.
I can dig DCIII's stuff on rezombied. Not sold on B_E as town, but his posts over the past day or two have been better.
Unvote
Vote rezombied
UUU Azami, Lady of Scrolls
RRR Diaochan, Artful Beauty
UR(U/R) Tibor, Lumia, & Melek (WIP)
Mafia Stats
Wouldn't this make perfect sense for a bus? Not really worth delving into until we have one or the other's flip, but worth noting.
I've been in two games with non-town Kosa. He was scum in WWE and the SK in Apocalypse.
/barn, hard. Why has no one else noticed this?
At the moment, I'm still liking a B_E lynch. Interested in the following answer, though:
@Proph: You said you're familiar with Rez's home site meta. How does his post-RVS play match up?
I don't believe you mean "bus" there. It would be distracting/counter wagon effort since DCIII went in a different direction than the current wagon.
... Unless you mean the player that DCII voted back then is the bus, but that wouldn't make sense for a Scum buddy to randomly bus at the particular moment.
I was referring to your comments about Odd iGem's behavior on the B_E wagon.
doesn't sound like more jokes? I thought my tone was pretty clear, but
You're right. It's completely unreasonable for me to not get straight down to business within the first 48 hours of the game starting. I can understand this being a legitimate concern further into the game or even the day, but we haven't even gotten through a weekend and you're harping on the quality of my posts already.
Not at the time. I have more to add, but have poor weekend availability to post. I can still read intermittently, though, and given that you misconstrued my posts, I found it important to post on it. I usually save my larger posts for early in the week.
Because you posted accusations and he posted more generalized thoughts. There was no need to respond to his post. That said, since it's something others have posted on, there's a difference between "testing the waters" and "waiting to see reactions". B_E's reactions were horrible.
-------------
In other news, based on rezombied's weird late vote on Megiddo "for no reason" and Megiddo initially dismissing votes/cases on rezombied out of hand, I wouldn't be surprised if rezombied being scum meaning Megiddo is also scum.
I can dig DCIII's stuff on rezombied. Not sold on B_E as town, but his posts over the past day or two have been better.
Unvote
Vote rezombied[/QUOTE]
First: Yes it is entirely reasonable to 'harp on about' the quality of your posts. You have clearly been active enough to post real content but you haven't.
Second: the unvote and Rez vote is horrible. You provide no new reasons, just vote with the momentum of the game. What about my posts have been better?
Town Win % = 75%
Mafia Win % = 75%
Overall Win % = 75%
Completed Game Log
2014: Best Mafia Performance (Group)
2014: Most Improved Player
2014: Best Town Player
2014: Best Overall Player
Yeah guys! Post more.
If you could refrain from making one line posts for things like spelling mistakes it would be appreciated. There are a rather lot of those, and they're hard to read through on a phone =]
I was calling for pressure, not more votes, but that said, votes is how some people apply pressure
Why do you not just respond to the case instead of arguing over someone else's interpretation of it?
@MOD
I will be going overseas from 22nd of Jan - 3rd Feb so expect vla during that time.
I -should- have internet at my hotel so I'll be following/posting as best I can during that time.
I will post tomorrow with some thoughts.
Enjoy your trip!
Town Win % = 75%
Mafia Win % = 75%
Overall Win % = 75%
Completed Game Log
2014: Best Mafia Performance (Group)
2014: Most Improved Player
2014: Best Town Player
2014: Best Overall Player
Fires Of Salvation
Must Read Post for any new player!
Sorry, not buying it. RVS was long dead, so if you wanted to get a reaction out of Meg, there were other ways to go about it. I have an issue with the mindset of trying to goad Meg with an RVS post RVS. Why not just analyse his posts up to that point and point out whatever issue(s) you had with them? It looks, to me, like you are trying to be productive without actually being productive.
Vote: Rezombied
I don't like the way you have responded to DC or Proph, and your recklessness in putting BE to L-1 just screams scum to me.
Second this.
UUU Azami, Lady of Scrolls
RRR Diaochan, Artful Beauty
UR(U/R) Tibor, Lumia, & Melek (WIP)
Mafia Stats
Actally you are thirding it, I said it first
Also @ DeathJoey. If you believe that Rez is scummy enough for everyone to put pressure on him, you should be voting him.
Sorry, having a busy week. I'll devote some time for this game tomorrow.
Condense yourself. I forbid you to double post for the rest of the game. If you do I will get you lynched no matter what anybody else says, does, or thinks. The brakes will be cut. You will die.
please tell me why this indicates scum motivation to you
I like you
I'm being swayed on rezombied though. I support pressure on him. We can revisit BE later.
mod: VC please
I have asked him about it, except he has been evasive.
I understand your case against me. It makes sense, except for the part about me 'jumping on the easy wagon'. I came in to about 7 pages of game having been played and voted for who I thought was scum.
Burning_Earth answered the questions I had for him.
So when do you actually start playing? 72 hours? 96? 4d20?
The case isn't a bad one, I came in and voted B_E to L-1 without arguably adding anything.
I'm going to keep trying to find scum to lynch though.
@iRebel: Your vote is bad.
A: oddigem said that, not me:). Also, I have not only been posting fluff.
B: I think odd is going off my mislynch wagon and voting for the newer and possibly easier one.
@oddigem: Answer that question please.
Was he (oddigem) voting you (BE) before?
Also I am 100% serious about forbidding you to double post.
Hey.
Hey, Megs.
Does this remind you of anything?
Everytime I see someone agree that the case on them is good or something along those lines, I remember this:
Good man. Let's lynch rezombied.
rezombied, please claim. If the mod counts the quote mangle you're at L-1.
The mod does not count the quote mangle. The mod will also get up an official votecount later this morning, for realsies this time.
....The mod is now tired of referring to himself in the third person.
Fixed my quote fail. There should have been a [/spoiler] tag instead of the quote one.
First: I'm not saying I couldn't post real content. I'm asking what the issue with levity in the first 48 hours of a game is.
Second: Does everyone have to provide reasons to join a wagon? I'm not going to try to invent my own reasons to join a wagon if the reasons that I'm joining a wagon are legitimate existing reasons that have already been stated in thread. How much new reasoning did you provide when you voted me?
As far as your posts are concerned, I could have sworn that you had gotten less defensive and were actually proactive about things, but upon going back and reviewing, I appear to have imagined that. I rescind my previous statement.
I still support a rezombied lynch over yours, though.
Answer the question about B_E's posts, or the one you asked B_E?
@oddigem: The one I asked BE that he told me I should have been asking you because of a quote misattribution
Not Voting -- Dkingsland (115), Deathjoey (0)
With 12 players alive, it is 7 votes for a lynch.
~Mod note: I'm (still) experimenting a bit with the votecount format. If it gets too obnoxious or there's some iota of information that you want that I'm not providing, let me know and I'll work it in. Need to find a style that works for me, after all
Enlighten us Monsieur Scum – why is my vote bad?
UUU Azami, Lady of Scrolls
RRR Diaochan, Artful Beauty
UR(U/R) Tibor, Lumia, & Melek (WIP)
Mafia Stats
This part was misattributed to me, but your assessment is based on the quality and quantity of his posts. My posts have been brief, but there was a point to them. If you consider them garbage, ok. The rest of this doesn't really apply to me.
I explained my vote for Megiddo. Go read the game.
-----
I am Jynx Salamand, Town Neighbor
I am a 1st-year apprentice with no master. I have joined a club -- something about a Cult of Al-Naxys. We mostly sit around and play some D&D knockoff, but one member takes the game pretty seriously.
As B_E has stated, we have a qt that we can post in at any time.
-----
There was some stuff that B_E posted in our qt that, in addition to things in the thread made me believe he was scum. That's why I said the case against me made sense, because I wasn't able to say "hey, b_e and I are neighbors and I think he might be scum because of some **** he said in our QT"
Unvote
Vote Prophylaxis
.
This is nice.
And also not at all what I said. There's a big difference between "ignoring every post [a player] has made in the first [span of time]" and expecting there to be some difference in how quickly each player gets down to business.
Define getting down to business for me.
No. It's irrelevant. Do you not understand the difference between the two statements?
If you thought Proph was being evasive, why wouldn't you continue to press him on it more and highlight that rather than asking me about his views? Especially if you really thought that he was saying that adding any new information to a case was scummy, because that would be a stance to really press. So, I doubt that you actually thought that was his stance.
Then, you spend your claim post saying that you think BE is scum because of stuff he posted in your neighbor QT, but then you switch your vote to Proph. I think that you're trying to cover for the inconsistency of your stance on Proph now without backing down from your vote on BE.
I'd like to see what Void, Tube, and Kosa have to say when they catch up and then I'd like to consolidate my reads, but I'm convinced that you should be the lynch Today.
Town Win % = 75%
Mafia Win % = 75%
Overall Win % = 75%
Completed Game Log
2014: Best Mafia Performance (Group)
2014: Most Improved Player
2014: Best Town Player
2014: Best Overall Player
I don't like this response either. Several people have switched their intentions from BE indicating that they think that Rez is more scummy. You indicated that BE looked better to you from his recent posting, which stood out to me because I didn't see much difference in what BE was doing.
So then, when pressed about it, you say that you imagined his posts improving and go back to expressing suspicion of BE. I'd think that you would have had something concrete that would have made you feel better about BE's posting to say so since you were voting him earlier. I think that you were feeling pressure for being on the BE wagon and wanted to give a reason for leaving it.
Town Win % = 75%
Mafia Win % = 75%
Overall Win % = 75%
Completed Game Log
2014: Best Mafia Performance (Group)
2014: Most Improved Player
2014: Best Town Player
2014: Best Overall Player