Note: This deal is considered null and void if you are scum, kill-joy. Can't have insider knowledge ruining my bet. As such, if I'm wrong, I'll change it after and if you've revealed town (whether that be game end or when you die.)
Now get to lynching pinky.
One condition: He at least gets to defend himself.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Yeah, you are clearly town. Now, when Pinky next posts, he should claim. I don't care that he's not at L-2 yet, he should still claim. Meanwhile, more people should vote him. Let's get a lynch before 72 hours of day!
Seriously though, why is he scum. I'd like some reason.
I'm pretty sure they don't have one.
I just gotta ask though: what town motivations are there to what Mu and Gigas are doing? Throwing a random person to the gallows hoping they flip scum?
No. I don't buy it.
We're not lynching pinky today.
Either Mu and Gigas are scum, or Mu is the lyncher.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I just gotta ask though: what town motivations are there to what Mu and Gigas are doing? Throwing a random person to the gallows hoping they flip scum?
No. I don't buy it.
We're not lynching pinky today.
Either Mu and Gigas are scum, or Mu is the lyncher.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Well, you're both jumping on him for no real reason. Therefore it looks like you're trying to get the town to jump on people unnecessarily. Therefore if he flips town, it would seem like you're scum.
Now that I've answered your question, please answer mine.
There is a reason. However, it will have to remain a secret for a bit longer to see if anyone else can figure it out.
And Mu, you've jumped me, kill joy, and pinky. That's three.
I'll look back at some older games tomorrow and see if this is just Mu's gameplay, but I think I've played with him before and I don't remember him doing this, but right now I'm tired.
I will consult my own hat tonight though.
Night.
No man, this isn't my game play at all. I'll tell you that right up front.
And I didn't jump on you. Like I said, there was no point.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Your constant dichotomy that pinkys_brian is town worries me. This is a direct contradiction of the hat.
So as to give time to others to join the thread, and cut down on the spam that's been caused up to now (Although it was very telling spam), I won't be replying to this thread for the rest of the night, unless something amazing happens.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
So as to give time to others to join the thread, and cut down on the spam that's been caused up to now (Although it was very telling spam), I won't be replying to this thread for the rest of the night, unless something amazing happens.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
So what if it's a basic? Its still the first few hours of the game. There is no reason to rule anything out just yet.
If there is a lyncher in this game, I will get an avatar and make it whatever you want. Unless, of course, you ARE the lyncher. But that is also amazingly unlikely. Basics don't have neutrals.
If there is a lyncher in this game, I will get an avatar and make it whatever you want. Unless, of course, you ARE the lyncher. But that is also amazingly unlikely. Basics don't have neutrals.
Ok. If that's true then I misunderstood what a basic was.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Yeah, you are clearly town. Now, when Pinky next posts, he should claim. I don't care that he's not at L-2 yet, he should still claim. Meanwhile, more people should vote him. Let's get a lynch before 72 hours of day!
So he is town because he want's a speed lynch?? So much scum...
Defend himself against what? Dude, the hat told me he was scum. There is no defending against that. The hat is final.
Everyone deserves to defend themselves, scum
Also, why all the pointless banter? So much obv scum
@Everyone still sane in this game, Sir Mu and Gigas are obvious scum. Tezz kinda redeems himself on page 6 and 7. My top 2 scum currently is Sir Mu and Gigas, in that order.
So, 100 posts overnight. Do they all go this fast?
Yeeeeaaaah, lynching pinky on the advice of the "hat"...don't think I'll be doing that.
I think I'll Vote: pinkfloyd. He seems a little self-conscious, and I think he's taking Sir Mu's clowning a bit too seriously. Can't wait to find out what pinky's reaction will be though.
I think I'll Vote: pinkfloyd. He seems a little self-conscious, and I think he's taking Sir Mu's clowning a bit too seriously. Can't wait to find out what pinky's reaction will be though.
HOW IS IT "CLOWNING"??
HE SAID HE ISN'T JOKING MANY TIMES AND WANTS PINKY LYNCHED! WHAT THE HELL MAN
Actually, at that point I still thought it was RVS. Note how I unvoted when I realized how absoloutly ridiculous Sir Mu was being.
Yes I realize that, that's why I wrote you redeemed yourself!
I was writing my big ass post as I was going through the pages and noticed after I made the first comment that you weren't scummy anymore and actually being reasonable
So tell me tezz, what is your standpoint of Sir Mu right now?
On post 10 you already call someone scum with no proof? GTFO
Random speed lynch, scummy as scum can be
Tezz jumps on wagon quickly, scum #2
**** right off, there is no proof. Scum #3
SERIOUSLY, THIS IS SO SCUMMY, WHAT THE HELL??? We are not ending the day at just over 100 posts with no proof.
So he is town because he want's a speed lynch?? So much scum...
Everyone deserves to defend themselves, scum
Also, why all the pointless banter? So much obv scum
@Everyone still sane in this game, Sir Mu and Gigas are obvious scum. Tezz kinda redeems himself on page 6 and 7. My top 2 scum currently is Sir Mu and Gigas, in that order.
Unvote, vote Sir Mu
Also, Kill, you are town to me right now.
Honestly? There is never any proof. There can be no proof short of a cop investigation. He's more likely to be scum than other people. The @Everyone part is really forced...The repetition in it shows that. In fact, I would almost be willing to say that the repetition is scummier than what pinky did. Oh, and thinking everybody that jumped on that wagon is scum? That is either some really awful thinking, or scum trying to get a mislynch. Combining these, I'd say you are our most likely scum.
Vote: pinkfloyd
Oh, and there is still a reason for the pinky vote. I'll reveal it when everyone posts.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
One condition: He at least gets to defend himself.
Cuz that's just not fair.
Yeah, you are clearly town. Now, when Pinky next posts, he should claim. I don't care that he's not at L-2 yet, he should still claim. Meanwhile, more people should vote him. Let's get a lynch before 72 hours of day!
That sounds more than fair.
What about that is common sense?
I'm pretty sure they don't have one.
I just gotta ask though: what town motivations are there to what Mu and Gigas are doing? Throwing a random person to the gallows hoping they flip scum?
No. I don't buy it.
We're not lynching pinky today.
Either Mu and Gigas are scum, or Mu is the lyncher.
Either way, lets not lynch pinky.
This is exactly what I would expect scum to post.
And this is exactly what I expect scum/lynchers to post.
Vote Mu
Get lynched, scum.
Everybody? I've jumped two people.
Excuse me, but pinkys_brian is scum. The hat is the evidence. THE HAT IS THE EVIDENCE.
Jeez how can I make this any more clear.
I'm serious about Mu being either scum or the lyncher.
The gambit he pulled almost worked.
I'm not letting him live past day 1.
There is a reason. However, it will have to remain a secret for a bit longer to see if anyone else can figure it out.
No lyncher in this game. You just shot way up on my scum list for suggesting there is one.
No man, this isn't my game play at all. I'll tell you that right up front.
And I didn't jump on you. Like I said, there was no point.
There is no reason.
There can't be.
How would you know that?
There's no way you can know that.
You and Mu need to get lynched.
We are. It's just a game.
Tell me the reason you think pinky is scum/can see his role pm or I'll ride your
wagonfighter jet all the way to your lynch.What about the hat do you not understand?
*sigh*
Scum. You and Gigas both.
I think we need to lynch either of them, town. Mu or his scumbuddy.
Are you disrespecting the hat?
I could have you beheaded for this.
You don't get to try to lynch a townie right out of the gate and go unnoticed.
At first I thought you were joking. Now...
LYNCH THE SCUM!
Your constant dichotomy that pinkys_brian is town worries me. This is a direct contradiction of the hat.
So as to give time to others to join the thread, and cut down on the spam that's been caused up to now (Although it was very telling spam), I won't be replying to this thread for the rest of the night, unless something amazing happens.
Good luck not getting lynched this Day, scum.
Daykill pinkys_brian
Is that amazing enough?
Here is my reasoning for no lyncher:
1. This is a basic
2. This is a basic
3. Dagger is a good mod
4. This is a freaking basic
And read his post again. That is a reason, but I will admit it probably isn't the strongest reason ever.
OH WTF?
It's ok I don't think you have that ability. If you do, and pinky dies... thats messed up, dude.
So what if it's a basic? Its still the first few hours of the game. There is no reason to rule anything out just yet.
Besides, if there isn't a lyncher he's still scum then. Either way.
And his reason is "not strong?" It's totally bogus. He damn near rode it to a premature probable mislynch.
Tell me that wasn't a 9 on the scummy scale.
You are correct in assuming I don't have that ability. Why would there be a daykill? After all:
Also, the hat is not bogus. The hat is correct.
If there is a lyncher in this game, I will get an avatar and make it whatever you want. Unless, of course, you ARE the lyncher. But that is also amazingly unlikely. Basics don't have neutrals.
Ok. If that's true then I misunderstood what a basic was.
But he's still scum.
Get lynched.
Are we still in RVS?
LOL
I'd like to think so.
But it seems Mu is zealously trying to lynch Pinkys_brain and has therefore ended RVS way early.
Just when I was gettin on a roll too!
Alright, in that case, Vote pinky, for making this game harder now we have 2 users with the name "pink"
Daykills are a joke, no one ever gets them
LOL
/QUOTE]
Ohhhhh you don't wanna do that.
Well I don't think it matters anymore. Pinky has 3 votes on him now, 2 of which are for no reason.
Also: Mu (and maybe Gigas) is scum.
That's about as much as an update as you need. lol
Unvote, vote pinkfloyd for being silly and not checking the votes
LOL
We still need more people in this game
On post 10 you already call someone scum with no proof? GTFO
Random speed lynch, scummy as scum can be
Tezz jumps on wagon quickly, scum #2
**** right off, there is no proof. Scum #3
SERIOUSLY, THIS IS SO SCUMMY, WHAT THE HELL??? We are not ending the day at just over 100 posts with no proof.
So he is town because he want's a speed lynch?? So much scum...
Everyone deserves to defend themselves, scum
Also, why all the pointless banter? So much obv scum
@Everyone still sane in this game, Sir Mu and Gigas are obvious scum. Tezz kinda redeems himself on page 6 and 7. My top 2 scum currently is Sir Mu and Gigas, in that order.
Unvote, vote Sir Mu
Also, Kill, you are town to me right now.
LOL
Yeeeeaaaah, lynching pinky on the advice of the "hat"...don't think I'll be doing that.
I think I'll Vote: pinkfloyd. He seems a little self-conscious, and I think he's taking Sir Mu's clowning a bit too seriously. Can't wait to find out what pinky's reaction will be though.
HOW IS IT "CLOWNING"??
HE SAID HE ISN'T JOKING MANY TIMES AND WANTS PINKY LYNCHED! WHAT THE HELL MAN
LOL
Yes I realize that, that's why I wrote you redeemed yourself!
I was writing my big ass post as I was going through the pages and noticed after I made the first comment that you weren't scummy anymore and actually being reasonable
So tell me tezz, what is your standpoint of Sir Mu right now?
LOL
Honestly? There is never any proof. There can be no proof short of a cop investigation. He's more likely to be scum than other people. The @Everyone part is really forced...The repetition in it shows that. In fact, I would almost be willing to say that the repetition is scummier than what pinky did. Oh, and thinking everybody that jumped on that wagon is scum? That is either some really awful thinking, or scum trying to get a mislynch. Combining these, I'd say you are our most likely scum.
Vote: pinkfloyd
Oh, and there is still a reason for the pinky vote. I'll reveal it when everyone posts.