It's funny that someone mentioned "Boilerworks." Seems fitting; this is a steaming pile after all.
How does this get voted up so many times? I think either BOTS have started voting, or people have very low standards for their decks, in terms of;
a. Card Quality
b. Card Selection
c. Mana Proportion
d. Actual Deck Viability/Power
This is a pile of randomness, not a "deck."
Envy isn't a good look for you man you've got some skills and knowledge instead of commenting like you did you could've shown the calm polite intellect of a champ you just look jealous right now you've been on this site for over 3 years multiple decks and you've not got a single deck up to 3 likes yet it's probably because of this attitude you show
I like it for being cheap, fast, and I've seen it in use it's been able to win some games and no bots don't like our posts but people we play against do there is 3 of us from the same area
I apologize for being rude. Even if didn't think your deck was quite as sharp as it could be, I didn't have to be a jerk about it.
I will say that my deck with +3 likes is way COOLER than this. That deck would destroy this deck, and it's just a pile of random, bad cards, put together by theme, rather than known success. But, I've been playing Magic since 1995, whereas you might have been BORN in 1995, comparatively. I think that decks get better with "consistency." With a bunch of 1-of card choices, "consistency" is not a trait of this deck.
But I shouldn't have been a jerk about it. So, you got me there.
You've got a strong ego it's funny this decks title is "testing the waters" the creator of it even has called it not that good but no she's got some skills and neither of us where born in 95 but for less than $10 she made a perfect deck to play on the go and a good deck for passing time when she doesn't feel like playing that much this deck is strong enough to beat my rdw 1 out of 3 rounds so I approve of it's skill
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Aug 31, 2018-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 1, 2018-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 1, 2018-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 1, 2018-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 6, 2018How does this get voted up so many times? I think either BOTS have started voting, or people have very low standards for their decks, in terms of;
a. Card Quality
b. Card Selection
c. Mana Proportion
d. Actual Deck Viability/Power
This is a pile of randomness, not a "deck."
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 8, 2018-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 8, 2018-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 8, 2018I will say that my deck with +3 likes is way COOLER than this. That deck would destroy this deck, and it's just a pile of random, bad cards, put together by theme, rather than known success. But, I've been playing Magic since 1995, whereas you might have been BORN in 1995, comparatively. I think that decks get better with "consistency." With a bunch of 1-of card choices, "consistency" is not a trait of this deck.
But I shouldn't have been a jerk about it. So, you got me there.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 8, 2018