I don't like vanilla creatures in my "expert level" sets. I'm sorry but if you have to put a freaking elf bear in the 2 drop slot you're clearly too lazy to think of something else.
Not Lazy Elf Bear 1G
Creature - Elf Scout
When Not Lazy Elf Bear comes into play target creature gains trample and +1/+1 until end of turn. If that creature has 5 or more power, it gains first strike.
2/2
Holy crap, did you see what I just did there? In my 3 minutes I designed something that is actually playable, fits the theme of the set, AND ISNT A FREAKING VANILLA DUDE!!!
Right, but do they want to give elves another tool when they got an entire deck dropped in their lap in LOR/SHA? Like what-a-noob suggests, R&D playtested this set.
Plus, your mechanic is more complex than what they wanted for the creature. I'm not doubting a nice streamlined mechanic was possible, but it wasn't needed. This slot does the job: limited fodder, core set plant, splashable elf to replace bears.
In truth, I dislike a land taking up a common slot more than a vanilla creature.
One other thought: R&D is obviously streamlining the game some. This is not the same thing as "dumbing it down". Think of Tarmogoyf. How many times do you count cards in the GY when that stupid thing is in play? Does doing so add to the fun?
Now compare to the Chroma stuff in EVE. That stuff all had expensive enough costs that you don't run into as routine counting situations. Moreover, you are only counting one thing, not trying to discern 9 different cardtypes. There's a subtle but distinct difference on the table that doesn't compromise play depth, but makes it more fluid.
It's a limited filler card, and a core set plant. It fills both of those roles quite well. Not every card is designed for every job, so judge them by what they're designed for.
Yeah, let's print a new grizzly bears now that we have obsoleted it a thousand times already.
To make it even better, let's make it the exactly same creatures types of a card printed a few months ago that is strictly better.
Woot for interesting cards that adds a lot to the game! Bonus points for it being in a smaller than usual set!
"I'm so going to draft Shards of Alara! Have you heard it? There's Grizzly Bears in the set! I can't wait to pick it."
....Yeap.
I like seeing people like you there. You know, the ones that draft horribly, lose horribly, and can't figure out why? And no this has nothing to do with Bears thing, it just has to do with the fact that instead of thinking of good ways to use cards you couldn't experiment with, you just try to use the same old thing again. Go you, you oblivious player, because there aren't 248 other cards in the set...
Seriously- ITS JUST A CARD. If there wasn't this card, you'd all complain about something else. GET OVER IT....
I like seeing people like you there. You know, the ones that draft horribly, lose horribly, and can't figure out why? And no this has nothing to do with Bears thing, it just has to do with the fact that instead of thinking of good ways to use cards you couldn't experiment with, you just try to use the same old thing again. Go you, you oblivious player, because there aren't 248 other cards in the set..
Thanks for the personal remark.
Yep, there's 248 other cards. Of which there's a lot of cards worse than this grizzly bears. That's saying a lot, isn't it?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from parinoid »
I rolled 5 D6's and got 3 fours. They must have changed the odds of getting a 4!
No they're not. It's a 2/2 for 2, there ARE worse things out there. This elf is strictly better than grizzly bears because, well it's an elf.
Dear God what is wrong with you people? I mean I started to play in MIRRODIN and got back in during RAVNICA, probably two of the best sets in the last decade, and even I'M not complaining about all this, grow up would ya'?
Yep, there's 248 other cards. Of which there's a lot of cards worse than this grizzly bears. That's saying a lot, isn't it?
If you can honestly admit that, then yes it says alot about you: Lack of creativity, hates change, and is upset the Red Carpet of Magic isn't laid out in front of you.
Now Talara's batalion is not exactly straightforward so for arguments sake lets look at Wren's Run Vanquisher, and just keep in mind that Talara's Batalion also does exist. And Bloom tender and Devoted druid are of course mana accelerators so we'll put that in the back of our mind as well.
So you're saying however that you think that new players are going to see this cool creature, this 2/2 elf and want to build a deck around it, what do you think the first change to that original decklist will be as soon as they see Wren's Run Vanquisher? Thats right, they're gonna say hmm... three sounds better than two for P/T and that deathtouch thing sounds cool.
Thus this creature is really worth nothing, to anyone.
If you can honestly admit that, then yes it says alot about you: Lack of creativity, hates change, and is upset the Red Carpet of Magic isn't laid out in front of you.
Sorry for making you have to try.
Hates change? Well, I don't like bad changes. Who does?
Lack of creativity? Depends. I like to make rogue decks. But decent rogue decks that actually stand some chance in some seriously play. Not whacky-johnny-multiplayer-unplayable-omglichmirror-deck. But my problem isn't with this type of card. They are just aimed at a different type of player.
Now tell me. What's your creative use for a vanilla 2/2 for 2? I'm eager to hear it. This card has so many creative potential.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from parinoid »
I rolled 5 D6's and got 3 fours. They must have changed the odds of getting a 4!
Now Talara's batalion is not exactly straightforward so for arguments sake lets look at Wren's Run Vanquisher, and just keep in mind that Talara's Batalion also does exist. And Bloom tender and Devoted druid are of course mana accelerators so we'll put that in the back of our mind as well.
So you're saying however that you think that new players are going to see this cool creature, this 2/2 elf and want to build a deck around it, what do you think the first change to that original decklist will be as soon as they see Wren's Run Vanquisher? Thats right, they're gonna say hmm... three sounds better than two for P/T and that deathtouch thing sounds cool.
Thus this creature is really worth nothing, to anyone.
Oh wow, you're serious, aren't you?
Ok, let's break down your poor examples, hm?
1) Wren's Run Vanquisher- You need another card in your hand. And that card HAS TO BE an Elf. It's rare that it happens, but there are times when your hand doesn't have an Elf, even in an Elf deck. So then what? This is a 3/3 Deathtouch for 4G...Next:
2) Talara's Batalion- You're joking, right? You're REALLY JOKING? No? Wait- how can you? You're thinking of todays standard green decks and nothing more. Ignore the fact you need to play a green spell before playing this? You can either drop the Cylian elf for 1G, or you can pray that your opening hand had two Llanowar Elves so you can drop the Batalion on turn 2?...Next:
3) Bloom Tender- is a 1/1. Not a 2/2. How did you manage to screw that up? Secondly, in Mono-green Elves, you're better off with Llanowar Elves. So how is this better than Cylian Elf? Can it even chump block a Grizzly Bears to begin with?....Next:
4) Devoted Druid- is a 0/2. Ok so it's obvious alls you're trying to do is name the 2-drop Green Elves without caring what they are. Devoted Druid is a combo card at best, a mana accelerator in a good deck, and a creature than is not providing you any offensive support whatsoever. Can it even handle a Cylian Elf? Not without it's own demise it can't!
Was that all? I mean a 2/2 Elf for 2 mana is good, especially when you can cast it at the expense of 2 mana where only 1 has to be G...
Also, if you're going to make an argument, at LEAST point out Elvish Warrior. But then again, it costs GG, not 1G.
Hates change? Well, I don't like bad changes. Who does?
Lack of creativity? Depends. I like to make rogue decks. But decent rogue decks that actually stand some chance in some seriously play. Not whacky-johnny-multiplayer-unplayable-omglichmirror-deck. But my problem isn't with this type of card. They are just aimed at a different type of player.
Now tell me. What's your creative use for a vanilla 2/2 for 2? I'm eager to hear it. This card has so many creative potential.
Read the above response- it's a 2/2 ELF that can be used in any deck that can spare 1 Green Mana with no drawbacks for playing it and provides a standard offensive support. If you think you're going to get more from a Common, you're obviously just some stuck-up player who can't stand change, good or bad, that doesn't benefit YOU.
Hates change? Well, I don't like bad changes. Who does?
Lack of creativity? Depends. I like to make rogue decks. But decent rogue decks that actually stand some chance in some seriously play. Not whacky-johnny-multiplayer-unplayable-omglichmirror-deck. But my problem isn't with this type of card. They are just aimed at a different type of player.
Now tell me. What's your creative use for a vanilla 2/2 for 2? I'm eager to hear it. This card has so many creative potential.
That's it, you're getting a steamflogger boss next set. Go and ***** about that, you don't know jack **** about designing a magic block so why don't you just stop acting like you do. It's limited filler, dear God, GOBLIN HERO DIDN'T EVEN GET THIS KIND OF FLAK! ****ing noobs...
Now Talara's batalion is not exactly straightforward so for arguments sake lets look at Wren's Run Vanquisher, and just keep in mind that Talara's Batalion also does exist. And Bloom tender and Devoted druid are of course mana accelerators so we'll put that in the back of our mind as well.
So you're saying however that you think that new players are going to see this cool creature, this 2/2 elf and want to build a deck around it, what do you think the first change to that original decklist will be as soon as they see Wren's Run Vanquisher? Thats right, they're gonna say hmm... three sounds better than two for P/T and that deathtouch thing sounds cool.
Thus this creature is really worth nothing, to anyone.
In all, it's average. It doesn't suck, and it's not great, and so they used a handful of slots for basic vanilla creatures. At least none of them are Fugitive Wizard or Goblin Hero, it's just a bear. Making a big deal out of it makes very little sense - this is a whole lot of sound and fury for absolutely nothing really. Could they have given it some kind of mostly benign ability to make it a little better. Yeah. Is it the worst card ever printed or a reason not to buy some Alara? No, it's just a simple common, and maybe that will tell us that such critters won't be in 11th, thinning out its traditionally vanilla herd.
EDIT: Partially Nath'd... with more vulgarity :D. And I forgot Squire. Plus many others.
Ezuri, Renegade Leader (Aggro/Combo - Favorite) Skullbriar, the Walking Grave (Sac and Grave hijinks) Azusa, Lost but Seeking (Landfall hijinks) Kaalia of the Vast (Heavily modded)
Well Jebus look at it this way. For That same two mana in an elf deck you can get:
Cylian Elf is not designed as a constructed card. If you look at it through the lens of a constructed card, you will obviously be disappointed. It's like complaining that a Dodge Caravan is a poor racecar!
Cylian Elf is obviously intended to be a limited filler and a core set plant. As a limited filler, it does its job of providing a simple creature. A good set for limited needs to avoid overstressing players with too many abilities in play at once. That means some of the creatures need to have few or no abilities. This is one of them.
As a core set plant, it replaces grizzly bears with something with a more relevant creature type. Wizards has a wishlist of cards they'd like to put in a core set but haven't been printed in an expert set yet. A few of them sneak into almost every expert set. This one has probably been on the list for quite some time.
So yes, Cylian Elf is a poor constructed card. That doesn't mean it's a bad card. It just means that its design objectives didn't include being a good constructed card.
I don't think people are really upset with cylian elf not being for constructed, but with the laziness it(and the other vanillas, and quite a few other cards in this set) demonstrate.
I was originally for smaller set sizes, because I thought it meant that each card would have more thought put into it.
I don't think people are really upset with cylian elf not being for constructed, but with the laziness it(and the other vanillas, and quite a few other cards in this set) demonstrate.
I was originally for smaller set sizes, because I thought it meant that each card would have more thought put into it.
"Perfection is attained, not when no more can be added, but when no more can be removed. " --Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
1) Wren's Run Vanquisher- You need another card in your hand. And that card HAS TO BE an Elf. It's rare that it happens, but there are times when your hand doesn't have an Elf, even in an Elf deck. So then what? This is a 3/3 Deathtouch for 4G...Next:
2) Talara's Batalion- You're joking, right? You're REALLY JOKING? No? Wait- how can you? You're thinking of todays standard green decks and nothing more. Ignore the fact you need to play a green spell before playing this? You can either drop the Cylian elf for 1G, or you can pray that your opening hand had two Llanowar Elves so you can drop the Batalion on turn 2?...Next:
3) Bloom Tender- is a 1/1. Not a 2/2. How did you manage to screw that up? Secondly, in Mono-green Elves, you're better off with Llanowar Elves. So how is this better than Cylian Elf? Can it even chump block a Grizzly Bears to begin with?....Next:
4) Devoted Druid- is a 0/2. Ok so it's obvious alls you're trying to do is name the 2-drop Green Elves without caring what they are. Devoted Druid is a combo card at best, a mana accelerator in a good deck, and a creature than is not providing you any offensive support whatsoever. Can it even handle a Cylian Elf? Not without it's own demise it can't!
wow. just wow.
1) the vanquisher is entirely superior to your beloved elf bear simply because there will almost never be a time when you don't have a second elf in hand to get it out for cheap. qed. next
2) battalion is pure junk, no question. this is pretty much the only one I agree with. I'd rather have vanquisher.
3 and 4) you didn't even read his post. those go in the mana acceleration slot. you know, for pumping stuff out fast? yeah.
anyway, not sure if you've played an elf deck before, but calling vanquisher a 3/3 deathtouch for 4G is a good example of not knowing what you're talking about. peace.
Take your monoblack deck, then set aside 14 swamps. Add 4 Creeping Tar Pits, 4 Darkslick Shores, 4 Drowned Catacombs, and 2 Jwar isle Refuge and add 4 Jace, the Mindsculptors. Your monoblack deck is instantly better. Better yet, drop those refuges, throw in some islands and some mana leaks, and lo and behold, you're now playing a real deck. Congratulations. Welcome to the world of competitive M:TG.
it's a 2/2 ELF that can be used in any deck that can spare 1 Green Mana with no drawbacks for playing it and provides a standard offensive support. If you think you're going to get more from a Common (...)
Anyway I'll stop trying to argue here. People are more willing to let out personal flamming instead of trying to give rational arguments, so whatever.
But it's funny. Someone creates a thread like: "Cylian Elf is not that bad. Why are you people saying that it's that bad?". Than we come here, reply this person that explictely asked the reason for why some people dont like that card, and than a lot of people appears and stat to post: "omg stop bashing that card, quit qq nb lolol".
This guy is just a mess. He's a result of 2 things:
1) R&D laziness
2) R&D catering to noobs
Don't give me bullcrap excuses like "OMGZ I R LOVE TEH R&D THEY ARE SO GOOD THEY NEVAR MAKE MISTAKES LIKE SKULLCLAMP OR BAD CARDS LIKE CHIMNEY IMP, THEY R THE BEST!!!"
The only excuse that makes sense is "Limited filler" I'll give you credit, that is accurate. However in a set that had Wizards folks saying "Best limited set...ever" I expected 2 drops that you know...did something besides swing/block. Frig I pick off color scarecrows all the time just to make my curve run smooth, but atleast those things freaking do something when I'm not running it as a vanilla guy!
Please, people gotta stop with the WoTC ****-riding and make your own freaking decisions for once.
They did; look at the Naya intro.
GX Tron XG
UR Phoenix RU
GG Freyalise High Tide GG
UR Parun Counterspells RU
BB Yawgmoth Token Storm BB
WB Pestilence BW
Good Limited Filler.
Limited Filler That Does Something.
True, you think that green would get something more but.
Good Limited Filler.
Butcher of Words.
Made by Spiderboy4
Right, but do they want to give elves another tool when they got an entire deck dropped in their lap in LOR/SHA? Like what-a-noob suggests, R&D playtested this set.
Plus, your mechanic is more complex than what they wanted for the creature. I'm not doubting a nice streamlined mechanic was possible, but it wasn't needed. This slot does the job: limited fodder, core set plant, splashable elf to replace bears.
In truth, I dislike a land taking up a common slot more than a vanilla creature.
One other thought: R&D is obviously streamlining the game some. This is not the same thing as "dumbing it down". Think of Tarmogoyf. How many times do you count cards in the GY when that stupid thing is in play? Does doing so add to the fun?
Now compare to the Chroma stuff in EVE. That stuff all had expensive enough costs that you don't run into as routine counting situations. Moreover, you are only counting one thing, not trying to discern 9 different cardtypes. There's a subtle but distinct difference on the table that doesn't compromise play depth, but makes it more fluid.
he is right in everything...
i dont know why the hate with a vanilla creature...that dosent hurt you at all, dont like it? DONT USE IT, DONT EVEN LOOK AT IT...
but come on dont make an entire thread just to say "this type of card sucks"
is almost like..."she has AIDS never kiss her"
besides is an elf...she is HOT!
Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.
....Yeap.
I like seeing people like you there. You know, the ones that draft horribly, lose horribly, and can't figure out why? And no this has nothing to do with Bears thing, it just has to do with the fact that instead of thinking of good ways to use cards you couldn't experiment with, you just try to use the same old thing again. Go you, you oblivious player, because there aren't 248 other cards in the set...
Seriously- ITS JUST A CARD. If there wasn't this card, you'd all complain about something else. GET OVER IT....
Yep, there's 248 other cards. Of which there's a lot of cards worse than this grizzly bears. That's saying a lot, isn't it?
actually like...90% of the people before me said that but...yeah i miss the creator of the thread and for that sorry...
i should have said..."dont throw your hate on a simple card that will even survive you..." or something like that...no?
No they're not. It's a 2/2 for 2, there ARE worse things out there. This elf is strictly better than grizzly bears because, well it's an elf.
Dear God what is wrong with you people? I mean I started to play in MIRRODIN and got back in during RAVNICA, probably two of the best sets in the last decade, and even I'M not complaining about all this, grow up would ya'?
If you can honestly admit that, then yes it says alot about you: Lack of creativity, hates change, and is upset the Red Carpet of Magic isn't laid out in front of you.
Sorry for making you have to try.
Wren's Run Vanquisher
Or
Talara's Batalion
Or
Bloom Tender
Or
Devoted Druid
That's in standard alone.
Now Talara's batalion is not exactly straightforward so for arguments sake lets look at Wren's Run Vanquisher, and just keep in mind that Talara's Batalion also does exist. And Bloom tender and Devoted druid are of course mana accelerators so we'll put that in the back of our mind as well.
So you're saying however that you think that new players are going to see this cool creature, this 2/2 elf and want to build a deck around it, what do you think the first change to that original decklist will be as soon as they see Wren's Run Vanquisher? Thats right, they're gonna say hmm... three sounds better than two for P/T and that deathtouch thing sounds cool.
Thus this creature is really worth nothing, to anyone.
Hates change? Well, I don't like bad changes. Who does?
Lack of creativity? Depends. I like to make rogue decks. But decent rogue decks that actually stand some chance in some seriously play. Not whacky-johnny-multiplayer-unplayable-omglichmirror-deck. But my problem isn't with this type of card. They are just aimed at a different type of player.
Now tell me. What's your creative use for a vanilla 2/2 for 2? I'm eager to hear it. This card has so many creative potential.
Oh wow, you're serious, aren't you?
Ok, let's break down your poor examples, hm?
1) Wren's Run Vanquisher- You need another card in your hand. And that card HAS TO BE an Elf. It's rare that it happens, but there are times when your hand doesn't have an Elf, even in an Elf deck. So then what? This is a 3/3 Deathtouch for 4G...Next:
2) Talara's Batalion- You're joking, right? You're REALLY JOKING? No? Wait- how can you? You're thinking of todays standard green decks and nothing more. Ignore the fact you need to play a green spell before playing this? You can either drop the Cylian elf for 1G, or you can pray that your opening hand had two Llanowar Elves so you can drop the Batalion on turn 2?...Next:
3) Bloom Tender- is a 1/1. Not a 2/2. How did you manage to screw that up? Secondly, in Mono-green Elves, you're better off with Llanowar Elves. So how is this better than Cylian Elf? Can it even chump block a Grizzly Bears to begin with?....Next:
4) Devoted Druid- is a 0/2. Ok so it's obvious alls you're trying to do is name the 2-drop Green Elves without caring what they are. Devoted Druid is a combo card at best, a mana accelerator in a good deck, and a creature than is not providing you any offensive support whatsoever. Can it even handle a Cylian Elf? Not without it's own demise it can't!
Was that all? I mean a 2/2 Elf for 2 mana is good, especially when you can cast it at the expense of 2 mana where only 1 has to be G...
Also, if you're going to make an argument, at LEAST point out Elvish Warrior. But then again, it costs GG, not 1G.
Read the above response- it's a 2/2 ELF that can be used in any deck that can spare 1 Green Mana with no drawbacks for playing it and provides a standard offensive support. If you think you're going to get more from a Common, you're obviously just some stuck-up player who can't stand change, good or bad, that doesn't benefit YOU.
That's it, you're getting a steamflogger boss next set. Go and ***** about that, you don't know jack **** about designing a magic block so why don't you just stop acting like you do. It's limited filler, dear God, GOBLIN HERO DIDN'T EVEN GET THIS KIND OF FLAK! ****ing noobs...
Limited.
Filler.
11th.
Replacement.
SQUIRE ANYBODY!?!? ANYBODY!?!?
It's better than Goblin Piker
It's better than Grizzly Bears (by virtue of relevant creature type)
It's not as good as Elvish Warrior
And it's slightly lower than Safehold Elite
In all, it's average. It doesn't suck, and it's not great, and so they used a handful of slots for basic vanilla creatures. At least none of them are Fugitive Wizard or Goblin Hero, it's just a bear. Making a big deal out of it makes very little sense - this is a whole lot of sound and fury for absolutely nothing really. Could they have given it some kind of mostly benign ability to make it a little better. Yeah. Is it the worst card ever printed or a reason not to buy some Alara? No, it's just a simple common, and maybe that will tell us that such critters won't be in 11th, thinning out its traditionally vanilla herd.
EDIT: Partially Nath'd... with more vulgarity :D. And I forgot Squire. Plus many others.
Commander
Ezuri, Renegade Leader (Aggro/Combo - Favorite)
Skullbriar, the Walking Grave (Sac and Grave hijinks)
Azusa, Lost but Seeking (Landfall hijinks)
Kaalia of the Vast (Heavily modded)
Standard
Waiting for Innistrad...
Extended
Hah!
Modern
Living End Cascade (RGB)
Legacy
Burn
Vintage
None
Casual
WB Aggro-Control
Green Stompy
Pink Floyd (UWr Wall Control)
Lunch Box (Fatty ramp)
D-Bag (White Control)
Level 13 Task Mage
Cylian Elf is not designed as a constructed card. If you look at it through the lens of a constructed card, you will obviously be disappointed. It's like complaining that a Dodge Caravan is a poor racecar!
Cylian Elf is obviously intended to be a limited filler and a core set plant. As a limited filler, it does its job of providing a simple creature. A good set for limited needs to avoid overstressing players with too many abilities in play at once. That means some of the creatures need to have few or no abilities. This is one of them.
As a core set plant, it replaces grizzly bears with something with a more relevant creature type. Wizards has a wishlist of cards they'd like to put in a core set but haven't been printed in an expert set yet. A few of them sneak into almost every expert set. This one has probably been on the list for quite some time.
So yes, Cylian Elf is a poor constructed card. That doesn't mean it's a bad card. It just means that its design objectives didn't include being a good constructed card.
Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.
I was originally for smaller set sizes, because I thought it meant that each card would have more thought put into it.
"Perfection is attained, not when no more can be added, but when no more can be removed. " --Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.
wow. just wow.
1) the vanquisher is entirely superior to your beloved elf bear simply because there will almost never be a time when you don't have a second elf in hand to get it out for cheap. qed. next
2) battalion is pure junk, no question. this is pretty much the only one I agree with. I'd rather have vanquisher.
3 and 4) you didn't even read his post. those go in the mana acceleration slot. you know, for pumping stuff out fast? yeah.
anyway, not sure if you've played an elf deck before, but calling vanquisher a 3/3 deathtouch for 4G is a good example of not knowing what you're talking about. peace.
/thread
Anyway I'll stop trying to argue here. People are more willing to let out personal flamming instead of trying to give rational arguments, so whatever.
But it's funny. Someone creates a thread like: "Cylian Elf is not that bad. Why are you people saying that it's that bad?". Than we come here, reply this person that explictely asked the reason for why some people dont like that card, and than a lot of people appears and stat to post: "omg stop bashing that card, quit qq nb lolol".
1) R&D laziness
2) R&D catering to noobs
Don't give me bullcrap excuses like "OMGZ I R LOVE TEH R&D THEY ARE SO GOOD THEY NEVAR MAKE MISTAKES LIKE SKULLCLAMP OR BAD CARDS LIKE CHIMNEY IMP, THEY R THE BEST!!!"
The only excuse that makes sense is "Limited filler" I'll give you credit, that is accurate. However in a set that had Wizards folks saying "Best limited set...ever" I expected 2 drops that you know...did something besides swing/block. Frig I pick off color scarecrows all the time just to make my curve run smooth, but atleast those things freaking do something when I'm not running it as a vanilla guy!
Please, people gotta stop with the WoTC ****-riding and make your own freaking decisions for once.
Safehold Elite wouldn't be put into a core set.
Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.