So, I doubt that anybody cares but I've developed a coding system that I feel is pretty well made. I just want to see if anybody can crack it, if you feel like trying of course.
So Numbers 98132457610,10675423189,89314275106,
and The Message IETIHSCDOSBAKERNBUEAIU.LEEQYSW
Thats it, Good Luck for those who are trying it. :D:D:D
You know back in the old days, when there wasn't EDH, these "griefer" cards in decks were the norm. If you played a Winter Orb when you're opponents were tapped out, it was a good play. Now, you get people telling you they wanna punch you ? It's really sad how carebare this format is, to the point that some loser has to rip up your cards.
I didn't even look for a pattern and not sure what the numbers have to do with anything. I got this:
This code is unbreakable.
Then some letters left over that I can't figure out (in the 5 mins I spent on it).
QUIELYSW
If you're using the actual letters of any of the words, it's going to be solved rather easily. Most codes are based on books with a slide/shift rule corresponding to each letter, paragraph and page in that book. What makes them tough is that you need the book and edition to know what slide/shift they are using. Anything that uses shifts or slides but uses the same letters that is in the actual message is nothing to actual codebreakers.
I was in Signals Intelligence in the Military, but never got to finish training because of my health.
Edit: I was kinda right. There's something more to it, or I'm blind. My eyes are spazzing out on me, lol. I definitely agree, though, that this says 'This code is unbreakable.' I could make that out without actually trying to crack it.
You know back in the old days, when there wasn't EDH, these "griefer" cards in decks were the norm. If you played a Winter Orb when you're opponents were tapped out, it was a good play. Now, you get people telling you they wanna punch you ? It's really sad how carebare this format is, to the point that some loser has to rip up your cards.
Thing is, there have been generations of people who live for code. There's not really an original one you can do.
You have a point there. A mere hobbyist couldn't make something better than an expert who devoted his life to the craft. But I am a stupid and stubborn bastard
You know back in the old days, when there wasn't EDH, these "griefer" cards in decks were the norm. If you played a Winter Orb when you're opponents were tapped out, it was a good play. Now, you get people telling you they wanna punch you ? It's really sad how carebare this format is, to the point that some loser has to rip up your cards.
.. Yeah. I could tell "This code is unbreakable" out of it by running my eyes over it. It couldn't've been crypted worse if you wrote it out in plaintext. I am not sure if it is as obvious with other messages, but this one was really obvious. If you are going for an anagram, or a partial one, at least move the letters away so the ones forming a word aren't so close to each other.
Even I can come up with a harder one. In twenty seconds. Let's see if you can break it:
15G1GA18G3G5GA18H1G90GA18G5G1G3G12511I
And even that is a fairly simple one.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The Sage is occupied with the unspoken
and acts without effort.
Teaching without verbosity,
producing without possessing,
creating without regard to result,
claiming nothing,
the Sage has nothing to lose.
You know back in the old days, when there wasn't EDH, these "griefer" cards in decks were the norm. If you played a Winter Orb when you're opponents were tapped out, it was a good play. Now, you get people telling you they wanna punch you ? It's really sad how carebare this format is, to the point that some loser has to rip up your cards.
Ever since I studied Kambun (an ancient Japanese writing system using Chinese characters for their sound but not their meaning to write out Japanese words, rather than simply writing in classical Chinese as they had previously), I thought that creating a code involving this would be pretty cool. A similar example of this is Buddhist scriptures transliterated into Chinese from the Sanskrit. The text is gibberish, but when spoken\chanted one can vaguely make out the original Sanskrit words. But only vaguely as "Asian languages" aren't exactly compatible with other languages.
It could essentially be a specialized replacement technique, which can be applied to simpler, extant code methods for an extra layer. Replace syllables and letters with Chinese characters, then do your scramble as complex as you want.
Phonetic codelanguages have been used quite a lot. More often than not, however, people come up with a new set of symbols that involves the new syllables, etc. And then they encrypt that.
It gets pretty ridiculous to try and break, yes.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The Sage is occupied with the unspoken
and acts without effort.
Teaching without verbosity,
producing without possessing,
creating without regard to result,
claiming nothing,
the Sage has nothing to lose.
I didn't even look for a pattern and not sure what the numbers have to do with anything. I got this:
This code is unbreakable.
Then some letters left over that I can't figure out (in the 5 mins I spent on it).
QUIELYSW
If you're using the actual letters of any of the words, it's going to be solved rather easily. Most codes are based on books with a slide/shift rule corresponding to each letter, paragraph and page in that book. What makes them tough is that you need the book and edition to know what slide/shift they are using. Anything that uses shifts or slides but uses the same letters that is in the actual message is nothing to actual codebreakers.
I was in Signals Intelligence in the Military, but never got to finish training because of my health.
You know back in the old days, when there wasn't EDH, these "griefer" cards in decks were the norm. If you played a Winter Orb when you're opponents were tapped out, it was a good play. Now, you get people telling you they wanna punch you ? It's really sad how carebare this format is, to the point that some loser has to rip up your cards.
You know back in the old days, when there wasn't EDH, these "griefer" cards in decks were the norm. If you played a Winter Orb when you're opponents were tapped out, it was a good play. Now, you get people telling you they wanna punch you ? It's really sad how carebare this format is, to the point that some loser has to rip up your cards.
So Numbers 98132457610,10675423189,89314275106,
and The Message IETIHSCDOSBAKERNBUEAIU.LEEQYSW
Thats it, Good Luck for those who are trying it. :D:D:D
Test Number Two.
So, harder code this time, hopefully XD.
5g12b21a11f1b5d18f2g14c21f 23d15e14i 19b9e8b20i5aa4e15g3h19a9c. 18c5b20h20g5e2c 19i9g 4f1c5g4e 19a5d13g9c20f5h13c15i19i.
This code is unbreakable.
Then some letters left over that I can't figure out (in the 5 mins I spent on it).
QUIELYSW
If you're using the actual letters of any of the words, it's going to be solved rather easily. Most codes are based on books with a slide/shift rule corresponding to each letter, paragraph and page in that book. What makes them tough is that you need the book and edition to know what slide/shift they are using. Anything that uses shifts or slides but uses the same letters that is in the actual message is nothing to actual codebreakers.
I was in Signals Intelligence in the Military, but never got to finish training because of my health.
▲
▲ ▲
I need to think of a better way to do a code then.
Edit: a better, original way.
Thing is, there have been generations of people who live for code. There's not really an original one you can do.
You have a point there. A mere hobbyist couldn't make something better than an expert who devoted his life to the craft. But I am a stupid and stubborn bastard
Even I can come up with a harder one. In twenty seconds. Let's see if you can break it:
15G1GA18G3G5GA18H1G90GA18G5G1G3G12511I
And even that is a fairly simple one.
and acts without effort.
Teaching without verbosity,
producing without possessing,
creating without regard to result,
claiming nothing,
the Sage has nothing to lose.
P.S. I will find a code that is nearly impossible to uncover MARK MY WORDS XD.
-Matt
Legacy:
Thanks to SGT Chubbs for the sig
It could essentially be a specialized replacement technique, which can be applied to simpler, extant code methods for an extra layer. Replace syllables and letters with Chinese characters, then do your scramble as complex as you want.
It gets pretty ridiculous to try and break, yes.
and acts without effort.
Teaching without verbosity,
producing without possessing,
creating without regard to result,
claiming nothing,
the Sage has nothing to lose.
I am in awe. How the heck did you do that?
How did you get that?
On a side-note, I too love codes and enjoy making my own.
It's pretty simple, I can see it just by looking at it.