Given the hypothetical situation (the men have no clothing or things to use, and the infinite landscape is TOTALLY empty and plane), I'll vote a high number to assure the human success. Something like three people holding each arm/leg and some others beating the creature chest and belly to death.
Most people overate the power of wild animals. Firstly, a given group of humans is almost assuredly able to find stick and rocks. But even excluding this, the simple and effective strategy would be to gouge out the eyes, a task for which fingers would suffice. Of course in the initial onslaught the bear may be able to maim several, afterwards he is utterly worthless. So I am going to say 5 untrained humans at minimum, if they are sufficiently willful and vicious. Training lowers this number. There are individuals in the world who could kill a bear alone, using only their hands.
That's what I thought too. I'm pretty sure there are tons or better long distance runners than humans. Humans are walkers, not runners.
In a mile race maybe. A horse will run itself to death it wont pace its self. As will any animal.
5 humans bunch up and creep close enough to get the bears attention. They run away the second it starts to chase, if it does manage to get close they start running in opposite directions to confuse the bear and regain the distance. And regroup, and repeat, when it gets exhausted they circle it and harass the bear untill it gets so exhausted it passes out or becomes nearly defenseless.
Suffocation would be the method of dispatching.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Don't you see that the whole aim of Moderators is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make infractions literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten.
wow, I can't believe I read this entire thread.......
No way it could be done. Compared to an unarmed human, a bear is a killing machine. Even if you had enough people to *somehow* overwhelm it, I don't know how they would actually go about killing the poor thing.
You mean, Godless Killing Machines right?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Matt McCullough »
I'm bad at magic, you're bad at magic, and Level 4 Pro Ari Lax is terrible at magic.
I love how the most popular answer seems to be "after he passes out from exhaustion from killing an army of people, run up and poke him in the eye until he bleeds to death"
My new vote - one person. That guy would just have to befriend and train another bear to kill this unholy dire bear that we've been discussing.
Did you ever see that movie The Grizzly Man, he befriended the bears and then he got eaten, still have got to go with Fodder Cannon
No, but did you see a little masterpiece called "The Beastmaster"? He wouldn't even need to kill the bear - he could probably make the bear commit suicide or something.
See, this is why I included 'lives may be at stake' in my emails to the scientists. I am certain most of them read the email, laughed and/or shook their fist into the heavens, and then deleted it...these people likely did not take it seriously, albeit I presented it as a professional and a gentleman.
No number of truly unarmed men would stand a chance. There's no possible way to inflict any sort of injury without using some combination of weaponry or environment.
And no, Judo ain't gonna work on no damn bear.
The only feasible way is if the people involved were totally irrational and many of them kamikazed their way to the bears eyes, ignoring the pain that would undoubtedly be inflicted upon them through claw and teeth. Even then, the bear has a good a nose as a bloodhound, and would be able to smell you, though just may be disoriented enough to falter somehow.
How did we come to the conclusion that they wouldn't even have the most rudimentary of weapons? I think someone made the argument earlier that humans are naturally inclined to use tools. That makes sense to me.....
It's just part of the hypothetical. With rudimentary weapons, and no fear (as per the hypothetical) it would take 1-3 humans almost definitely. The question was to figure out how many men it would take without the weapons. It's a more interesting question, because yes, humans would always use tools and weapons if this situation happened in real life.
What's ironic is that Wizards made Grizzly Bear a 2/2 vanilla creature.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Watch your thoughts, for they become words.
Watch your words, for they become actions.
Watch your actions, for they become habits.
Watch your habits, for they become character.
Watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.
How many men does it take kill a grizzly bear? Well is appears that it takes only a couple R&D guys to kill all the grizzly bears to come. Preemptive strike!!
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Thanks for the Sig! SpiderBoy4 at [High~Light Studios]
I know you are half-joking with the Grizzly Bears argument, being only a 2/2 and all, but I think creature P/T scale either doesn't truly exist or is logarithmic or something. Look at Uril, the Miststalker and tell me 2 grizzly bears and 1 eager cadet could kill that thing, if it existed in real life? I think P/T is scaled negatively, so a 2/2 is more than twice as strong as a 1/1.
If a grizzly bear can survive multiple shots from a shotgun and keep going, I'm pretty sure it would be able to deal with some sharpened sticks and edged stones...
You presented this topic saying that lives were at stake if they did not respond, because you might throw naked men at a bear in real life. To put it bluntly, your presentation of this question was absurd, and considering how absurd the question was already, I cannot see how their reaction to your emails was surprising.
If a grizzly bear can survive multiple shots from a shotgun and keep going, I'm pretty sure it would be able to deal with some sharpened sticks and edged stones...
Yes.
There is nothing a group of human beings can do to a bear. A single hit from a bear's claws or teeth will incapacitate a human being. You cannot do anything to a bear, its hide is too thick, to the point where bears can survive gunfire. You cannot surround a bear, it will break through your ranks. Unless you have numbers into at least fifty or more men, you will not have a chance against a bear, and even then I fail to see how you'd actually kill it.
I'm not familiar with bear anatomy, but they will have weak spots. If human kicks and punches could do serious damage to these spots (genitals, temples, eyes, throat...), then you could kill a bear.
... Guns. Not kill bear. Many shots to kill bear. From a gun. How is this not registering?
Ok, here. This is a gun. These are shots from a gun. It takes multiple shots from a gun to kill a grizzly. Multiple. Multiple shots. FROM A GUN.
You could also take the least likable of your group and have him stuff his arm down the bear's throat, trying to make him choke.
Shove his arm down a bear's throat. Ok. So he'd have to get close enough to the bear without the bear swatting him away, get the bear to open its mouth, and shove his arm in, without dying or, you know, getting his arm ripped off by the enormous teeth.
Sure, totally doable.
Hell, even if you have no sticks and stones, you can use the skull of an already fallen comrade after the bear is done with him and feeding on another fallen guy.
Shots. From a gun. Multiple. Still don't kill bear.
I'm thinking maybe 30 or so could do it. Yes, bears are beasts. Yes, they can maul a human being in a single strike. But 30? Assuming this is a 1200 pound bear, and the humans average 180 pounds, they outweigh him by 4200 pounds. Assuming each can lift their body weight, that's 5400 pounds of force they can apply.
I'd say, screw the tactical feint approach. Take advantage of his ability to only kill 1 or 2 at a time, and overwhelm him. I severely doubt that this bear has the strength to kill 30 people before they manage to subdue him. Every animal has weak spots. 20 guys punching, kicking, and clawing a bear in the face WILL do serious damage. I know hits to his midsection are all of useless, but if they can't break any bones of its skull with that much force, then I find it hard to understand how we manage to ever kill the things, short of .50 cal rifles.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
A big thank you to Spiderboy4 at High~Light Studios for the awesome banner.
Favorite card quotes:
[card]Pinpoint Avalanche
[/card]"Some solve problems by thinking and talking. Others use rocks." --Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith
Fodder Cannon Step 1: Find your cousin. Step 2: Get your cousin in the cannon. Step 3: Find another cousin.
To those who say it's impossible, that's not true. Many men can kill the bear. Say a stupidly high number (like 1,000,000 men) and think all of them jump AT THE SAME TIME over the bear: it will just die under the weight (with the most of the men, too).
Now, that you see that IS possible, the question is: what is the smallest number of men you think that can kill a bear? 100? 80? 50? 10? But don't say it's impossible.
Generally, 5 or 6 well trained, well fit human beings around their late 20's would probably be able to wrestle down the bear and restrict it of its movements before taking the final sway to end the beast's life. You should never try this, though. It's not worth it.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
[Clan Flamingo]
The clan for custom card creators!
Variation: How many 5 year olds could you kill?
In a mile race maybe. A horse will run itself to death it wont pace its self. As will any animal.
5 humans bunch up and creep close enough to get the bears attention. They run away the second it starts to chase, if it does manage to get close they start running in opposite directions to confuse the bear and regain the distance. And regroup, and repeat, when it gets exhausted they circle it and harass the bear untill it gets so exhausted it passes out or becomes nearly defenseless.
Suffocation would be the method of dispatching.
Excellent question.
Two.
That's a fun one. Next week's thread?
You mean, Godless Killing Machines right?
My Trade List (long dead)
My Sales List (long dead)
">Foil Japanese Death and Taxes! (In progress, needs <10 cards)
There's a reason that threat number one is so often.......BEARS!!!
Maybe we should enlist the help of Monsieur Colbert. With his influence, I'm sure he could get some "serious" answers to our questions.
This was the first magic card I ever held
Awesome Sig made by Magus of the Sheep @ Scuttlemutt Productions
Persuasive God of Deals of the [The Æsir]
наши пушки никогда шин
My new vote - one person. That guy would just have to befriend and train another bear to kill this unholy dire bear that we've been discussing.
Did you ever see that movie The Grizzly Man, he befriended the bears and then he got eaten, still have got to go with Fodder Cannon
Awesome Sig made by Magus of the Sheep @ Scuttlemutt Productions
Persuasive God of Deals of the [The Æsir]
наши пушки никогда шин
No, but did you see a little masterpiece called "The Beastmaster"? He wouldn't even need to kill the bear - he could probably make the bear commit suicide or something.
Your first sentence contradicts your last.
And no, Judo ain't gonna work on no damn bear.
The only feasible way is if the people involved were totally irrational and many of them kamikazed their way to the bears eyes, ignoring the pain that would undoubtedly be inflicted upon them through claw and teeth. Even then, the bear has a good a nose as a bloodhound, and would be able to smell you, though just may be disoriented enough to falter somehow.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
How did we come to the conclusion that they wouldn't even have the most rudimentary of weapons? I think someone made the argument earlier that humans are naturally inclined to use tools. That makes sense to me.....
Sig by XenoNinja of Heroes of the Plane Studios
I would disagree.
Watch your words, for they become actions.
Watch your actions, for they become habits.
Watch your habits, for they become character.
Watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.
Sig by XenoNinja of Heroes of the Plane Studios
You presented this topic saying that lives were at stake if they did not respond, because you might throw naked men at a bear in real life. To put it bluntly, your presentation of this question was absurd, and considering how absurd the question was already, I cannot see how their reaction to your emails was surprising.
Yes.
There is nothing a group of human beings can do to a bear. A single hit from a bear's claws or teeth will incapacitate a human being. You cannot do anything to a bear, its hide is too thick, to the point where bears can survive gunfire. You cannot surround a bear, it will break through your ranks. Unless you have numbers into at least fifty or more men, you will not have a chance against a bear, and even then I fail to see how you'd actually kill it.
... Guns. Not kill bear. Many shots to kill bear. From a gun. How is this not registering?
Ok, here. This is a gun. These are shots from a gun. It takes multiple shots from a gun to kill a grizzly. Multiple. Multiple shots. FROM A GUN.
Shove his arm down a bear's throat. Ok. So he'd have to get close enough to the bear without the bear swatting him away, get the bear to open its mouth, and shove his arm in, without dying or, you know, getting his arm ripped off by the enormous teeth.
Sure, totally doable.
Shots. From a gun. Multiple. Still don't kill bear.
I'd say, screw the tactical feint approach. Take advantage of his ability to only kill 1 or 2 at a time, and overwhelm him. I severely doubt that this bear has the strength to kill 30 people before they manage to subdue him. Every animal has weak spots. 20 guys punching, kicking, and clawing a bear in the face WILL do serious damage. I know hits to his midsection are all of useless, but if they can't break any bones of its skull with that much force, then I find it hard to understand how we manage to ever kill the things, short of .50 cal rifles.
A big thank you to Spiderboy4 at High~Light Studios for the awesome banner.
Favorite card quotes:
[card]Pinpoint Avalanche
[/card]"Some solve problems by thinking and talking. Others use rocks." --Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith
Fodder Cannon
Step 1: Find your cousin.
Step 2: Get your cousin in the cannon.
Step 3: Find another cousin.
Now, that you see that IS possible, the question is: what is the smallest number of men you think that can kill a bear? 100? 80? 50? 10? But don't say it's impossible.
[Clan Flamingo]
The clan for custom card creators!