MTG Salvation

Is this broken? This feels broken.

This guy is a dead card against graveyard hate such as Relic, RIP or Leyline. It sure is strong, but it also has a lot of archenemy hate cards.

This set has a 2B 7/6 that barely has text. I'm not super worried about this guy.

Demon of Wailing Nipples

Really needs 4 different costs to have a viable efficiency, given that deathtouch is not particularly relevant in a color that can kill most threats easily.

Works well with Surveil, as Thought Erasure, Price of Fame, Mission Briefing and Discovery all have different mana costs, and so do other choice cards as Duress; Jace, Wielder of Mysteries; Enter the God-Eternals...

goyf for 3 with flying and deathtouch.

So what if something is a multicolor, like (g/r) vs. g

(R/G) is a different cost than G. This guy may as well read "+1/+1 counter for each different name among non-land cards in your graveyard." Maybe mono black might run two different named cards of the exact same but I think everything else has little if any duplicate costs involved.

Gah. I get the concept they're going for, but that is just clunky wording and a clunky ability.

Guys, it will be banned in no time. Glips the unthinkable turn 2, turn 5 EoA + counter = easy 4/4. Add eventualy some blinkers to spice it up and some others win condotions and we have the new fling goith.

So, the question is, if I have Living End in my graveyard, is no mana cost the same as 0, or does it even have a mana cost?

I think this would be better if it grew as your graveyard grew, alla Tarmogoyf. As it stands it might be payable in Modern still. In Traverse decks you have 0, 3BB, B, G, and BG all pretty easily in the early turns. And then going for 1BB, 1B, and 1(P/B)(P/B) is not unrealistic either. So I could see this as a 1-of late game threat that consistently comes down as a 5/5 or bigger