2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on [[FTV]] From the Vault full spoiler?
    This is absolutely the correct list, and always has been, and the mods continual refusal to admit that has been rather astonishing.

    You used debatable evidence of fonts on a printed insert sheet, not the actual cards, when we know WotC changes fonts for things like preview cards already.

    You ignored things like the correct layout and format and new artwork and sensible setlist and even the completely puzzling omission of Virtue's Ruin from Vintage Masters that all piled up evidence in its favor.

    Not your best hour, mods.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[COMM]] Smfcorp.net Preview - Némésis de I'identité
    Finally! I've been wondering when one of the 2(last time) "Legacy/Vintage" viable cards would show up. Looks like this is one.

    Man... that's even better than protection from all colors and artifacts in a duel, and it's on a 3/1?

    Besides sac effects and wraths, there's no easy way to stop it.

    In a duel, barring stuff like running your own Pyroclasm, is it identical to Progenitus's ability? Are there corner cases where it's not?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[MTGO]] Swords to Plowshares new expansion symbol
    That is the set symbol from the "Exiled" Legacy Pre-Built deck released a few years ago. You can find it in MTGO under Special Sets with the "TDO" code, or "Theme Deck Set" in the drop down list. Part of a failed experiment.
    Posted in: Rumor Mill Archive
  • posted a message on Chandra only new M14 planeswalker?
    Here's what they've done with Core Sets Mythics in the past:
    M10: 9 reprint, 6 new
    M11: 7 reprint, 8 new
    M12: 8 reprint, 7 new
    M13: 8 reprint, 7 new

    For M14, we're already at 9 NEW Mythics:
    Chandra (pretty much has to be)
    Archangel of Thune
    Devout Invocation
    Windreader Sphinx
    Rise of the Dark Realms
    Shadowborn Demon
    Scourge of Valkas
    Primeval Bounty
    Ring of Three Wishes

    This already is more new mythics than we've ever had in a core set. That, coupled with:
    1) It's unlikely there's more than 15 total. No set has had more than 15, except those that use an extra slot (Innistrad had 16, DKA and DGM had 12/11 for a small set).
    2) It's unlikely they're all new mythics, though we only have past Core Sets to look at.
    3) No other PW has been prominently featured in the advertising for M14.
    4) We know the Lorwyn Five are returning in some form.

    That leads me to believe we've probably seen all the non-reprint Mythics for this set except Chandra, and that the other 4 PW will all be reprints. Probably the same 4 that were in M13, as that Jace and Garruk are reasonably popular and still hold some value, and Ajani and Liliana are new from that set.

    It's possible there's one other non-reprint Mythic if they wanted to push it to 10 new/5 old, but I doubt it's another PW based on the lack of advertising images.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [[MM]] Name and Number Crunch
    Quote from Fluxje
    Considering the two spots left for the hybrid slots, we can almost say with near certainty that Swans of Bryn Argoll will be the U/W hybrid, (it makes sense from both a draft and hystorical standpoint).
    The only U/R hybrid card that is viable then is Unnerving assault.


    Since we already have a puzzling 2 U/R (non-Hybrid) cards, I strongly believe they realized that no U/R hybrid was worth reprinting and just went with 2 U/R multicolors - Jhoira and Electrolyze. That solves both issues - missing U/R hybrid that has no obvious candidate, extra U/R multicolor spell.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[M14]] Opportunity
    Wow, I thought they were dialing back on the instant speed multiple card draw? I guess once you print Sphinx's Revelation, all bets are off.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[MM]] Modern Masters - Modern Legal Booster Product Announced at Pro Tour RtR
    Ummmm I literally bought a box of Return to Ravnica for $85 just a few months ago so I don't think think the $2.50 is accurate.


    Yeah, the accurate amount of what shops pay when buying is more like $73-$75. Like $2.05 a pack.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [New Info] More 10 card cycles for dual lands
    Quote from zombielynx21
    For what it's worth, I don't think we're going to see the Onslaught Fetches in a standard-legal set. Beyond any sort of development concerns, I don't think they want all 10 in Modern.


    This is the exact reason they will - it makes no sense at all to have the enemy ones, and not the allied ones in Modern for the next infinity years. R&D hates stuff like this. They'll fix it.

    They'll be in M15 or M16 along with the ZEN ones. After the RAV shocks are out of std.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Common Artifact fixers
    There's space for exactly 10 artifacts in Dragon's Maze. The leadoff article heavily implies that these are common mana fixers.

    It also says they tried a bunch of designs, and didn't settle on anything before handing it off. Development ended up at one of the very first designs they tried. So I would assume it's something fairly simple and obvious.

    My guess is that it's finally time to get 2-color diamonds. Worse than the signets, but certainly playable.

    2
    Gruul Jewel
    Comes into play tapped.
    Add R or G to your mana pool.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Dragon Maze all gold cards a la Alara Reborn?
    Much more likely (but still not likely) is the idea that every card will belong to a guild and have a watermark - every card will either be monocolored and have the guild mechanic or an off color activation cost, or be multi-colored.

    But it's probably not likely given the "rising up of the Guildless" that seems to be addressed in some flavor text.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [[BaseSpec]] Why WOTC needs to reprint Onslaught Fetchlands
    Quote from tamaguna
    Wizards will reprint the Onslaught Fetchlands, but not before Return to Ravnica rotates out of standard. I really don't think that there is much question of this, there is really no reason for Wizards not to reprint the Onslaught Fetchlands. Wizards is looking to support Modern, a format that doesn’t rotate and has powerful cards at its disposal, yet does not have the hindrance of the Reserved list to deal with. There is absolutely no reason for Wizards not to reprint them to make them Modern Legal, you just have to wait, nuff said.


    This, exactly. They WILL be reprinted in a Modern legal set (either core or expansion). But it's unlikely to be in standard at the same time as the shocklands - why would they concentrate all their best lands in one year, and leave little for the other years? My guess is M2015 or 2016 will see a return of all 10 fetchlands - ONS and ZEN alike. They've said they know how tired we are of the M10 lands after 4 years.

    The reason they absolutely will be reprinted? It makes no sense to have only the enemy color fetches in Modern, but not the ally-color. It definitely irks people in R&D. It will happen. We just don't know when, and not within the next year.
    Posted in: Baseless Speculation
  • posted a message on Scalding Tarn, Misty Rainforest
    I'm firmly convinced that they'll reprint all 10 Fetchlands (including the ONS ones) in M14 or M15.

    -They know how tired we are of M10 duals, and have all but promised they won't be around forever (they wanted to keep them in one more time with the INN enemy ones and the RAV shocklands).
    -It's very, very odd to have the enemy color fetches in Modern but not the ally color fetches. Eventually, they will want to right this problem.
    -The promise to reprint Modern staples would definitely include the Zendikar fetches.
    -After the so-so reception of M13, having a full set of fetches in M14 or M15 would be bonkers for them.
    Posted in: Rumor Mill Archive
  • posted a message on [SCD] Sphinx's Revelation
    Quote from planeswalker7976
    Um, yea It would be BAH-ROKEN without the 2nd U...Look at Stroke of Genius, thats pretty much the bar for instant-speed variable card draw; CMC= X+3...The white is needed for the Lifegain, and X1WU just looks awkward....


    I think if it was XUW and a sorcery to match the others in the cycle it would have been fine.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [M13] - Searing Spear - justify
    This isn't a new thing. I'm surprised it took them this long. They've been backing off of the no-regen clauses for years.

    Here's every new (non-reprint) card with a no-regen clause all the way back through Lorwyn-Shadowmoor block, 5 years ago:
    Wooden Stake - no idea on this one, guess it's just for the flavor of them not coming back.
    Consume the Meek - this is supposed to be "Smother everything", and Smother has the clause, so it fits.
    Child of Alara - they didn't want to have him exile all nonland permanents, I guess. So they used it here.

    That's it. Everything else has been reprints grandfathered in, until they decide to reprint them without the clause, like here.

    The only reason Incinerate has the clause at all is because back in 1994, the designers of Ice Age wanted to use Lightning Bolt, but couldn't because even back then they realized it was too good. So rather than just straight add one mana to it and have everyone complain, they added the minorest of minor abilities to it to justify the added mana. An ability that probably is relevant once every 1000 games. And called it Incinerate.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Cavern of Souls Rules Change
    Yet another retraction for Toby Elliott? Maybe he should start, you know, checking with WotC before giving these pronouncements from on high.

    (see the fiasco with lapsed triggers)

    I kind of can't believe he still has his position.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.