-
- secretgiant
- Registered User
-
Member for 19 years, 1 month, and 18 days
Last active Thu, May, 30 2019 17:09:53
- 0 Followers
- 180 Total Posts
- 28 Thanks
-
Apr 1, 2018
secretgiant posted a message on The True History of DominariaAnother funny one! Good April Fools at mtgs this year!Posted in: Articles -
Apr 1, 2018
secretgiant posted a message on Announcing: The Underworld Cookbook!Happy April!Posted in: Articles
-
Nov 30, 2017
secretgiant posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemThis article is wrong to characterize anyone with sympathies to dimensions to complex problems as Nazi-lovers. Freedom of speech is a legal right, but harassment is sometimes illegal. People who say things we disagree with should be countered in a principled way or ignored. If speakers are mercilessly harassed (I don't know if Hambly was genuinely harassed) for their speech, that is not ok. I believe Sprankle has been insulted for sexual and gender reasons and I don't respect Hambly's position on how to characterize women. Behavior like Hambly's is known to exclude women from all kinds of environments, so I don't doubt that sometimes women avoid MTG because they don't want to be treated like animals. But harassing him as revenge accomplishes nothing good. It reveals that the friends of women in our community agree with these methods. The way deal with things we don't agree with are as important as our beliefs. Men in our community that hate women are harassers, it seems, and some of the men that defend women are harassers too.Posted in: Articles
People like Hambly and his speech and behavior should be condemned by the community and members of the community must stop tolerating an anti-female environment.
-
Apr 2, 2017
secretgiant posted a message on The Magic Market Index for April 1, 2017Maybe like a little error on those BFZ prices?Posted in: Articles
-
Jan 31, 2017
secretgiant posted a message on The Magic Market Index for January 27, 2017Why?Posted in: Articles
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I would hardly call a low-quality (debatable point) product faulty. Perhaps to save money WOTC developed a lower-cost, lower-quality product. This changes the value proposition and might lead to lost revenues, but hardly the basis for a lawsuit.
What is Rudy trying to accomplish?
EDIT: Just to add forgotten quote
100% genuine and unaltered and I am the proud owner of these Cokes for the next 1 day and 20 hours.
or
* Offer complete 'sets' periodically containing an amount of reserved cards. Allow unlimited sales during the production window.
or
* Masterpiece-like lottery
or
* Something like the old MPR program, force people to play a lot of sanctioned events to get their bonuses in the mail. Make judge promos better too.
or
* Make new dual lands that don't have basic land types or are painlands with the types, ban old duals in legacy. Vintage can stay vintage if Wizards wants to continue a true VIP format.
I like Un sets, I drafted Unhinged when it was new and I used to own a set of Unglued. I don't expect to spend much or anything on new Unstable products, but I might go to the release. Either way, the set improves my Magic experience and helps retain me as a customer for other products.