I understand it's a little too early to judge how parasitic this would be and I'm not trying to blow it out of proportion. I'm just trying to raise realistic questions.
There's a ton of enchantment support scattered throughout magics history.
I just realized that Monstrosity isn't actually a keyword - it's an action word like Proliferate. It's formatted exactly the same as Trostani, Selesnya's Voice's activated ability.
This means we might get triggered Monstrosity - "When a creature you control dies, monstrosity 2" does sound a little weird though.
I think the formatting would be more like "Monstrosity - When another creature you control dies, this creature becomes monstrous."
I have a Parallax Tide in play with all its fade counters, and my opponent controls at least 5 lands I can target. Can I activate the ability 5 times, holding priority each time, and stack the second ability so that I exile 5 lands forever? Similar to the way Fiend Hunter works when it dies with its first ability on the stack.
Also, if this works, I assume it works Parallax Wave as well?
Edit: I see I misunderstood how fading worked. This only works if you can destroy the enchantment at instant speed through some other means.
Whenever a creature enters the battlefield, put a decay counter on [cardname]. Creatures get -x/-x where x is the number of decay counters on [cardname].
The vote isn't about the absolute worst company, it's about the perceived least popular company. EA has done more to directly piss off its consumers than other companies that have done objectively worse things.
There's a ton of enchantment support scattered throughout magics history.
I think the formatting would be more like "Monstrosity - When another creature you control dies, this creature becomes monstrous."
Also, if this works, I assume it works Parallax Wave as well?
Edit: I see I misunderstood how fading worked. This only works if you can destroy the enchantment at instant speed through some other means.