I was actually hoping for a tidehollow sculler reprint. I like it. It takes a card and eats an opponents removal spell if they want their card back. Im assuming that you can't permanently exile the card with the way they worded it correct?
There is no way it is real. Why are we discussing it as if people need to be convinced of it's fakeness?
Because people want to sound smart in trying to debunk it when in reality its a fake because of a blurry picture and thats all people need to know. Seriously, just how fast was that card moving for the person to not be able top take a clear picture of a card?
Its a fun little card, 98% sure it isnt constructed playable but for the mana cost its a good card to get yours or your opponents creature. It makes battle math easier if you have 3 mana open since technically it just makes one of your creatures indestructible or youre getting one of your opponents creatures
Now what sucks is that 1 of the cards get a "bye" and a possible contender never had a chance. WOTC certainly wasnt on the ball when filtering through these cards. Honestly, they picked 8 cards and all they had to do was confirm that only 8 card creators followed the rules, if 1 didnt then DQ it right there and then and pick another one, its not that hard.
Note of caution: Bestiaire DGM packs still have basic lands in them for some reason, and Guildgates are appearing outside of their allocated land slot i.e. it is possible to get multiple Guildgates in a single pack, artificially lowering the value of taking Gates early and raising the value of Gatekeepers
I hope they get it fixed before the MTGO release. This is my favorite draft site and I like practicing before release online. They also have mazes end in the regular rare slot I noticed too.
Chances are that they needed a Chase Mythic or more Chase Mythics and Emmara could not have been a Mythic. As far as I see the ability is pretty good, nothing to write home about but it is good nonetheless and the fact that people want this card shows that wizards did the right thing from a business standpoint making it a card that people want.
Good thing I only draft. Im with everyone that this set on its own doesnt look that great but honestly Im just excited to draft all three together. Im judging Dragons maze as a whole with RtR and Gatecrash and this is going to be a pretty fun limited environment. I might even play a few sealeds too because of the diverse card pool.
It should be worded as revealing the card and do you mean creatures get -x/-x until the end of turn or put permanent counters on your creatures. Either way its too much of a drawback for me to play just to draw an additional card. Maybe in a control deck where you finishers arent coming down until after turn 6 or so and they are big enough to survive the drawback.
I control 1 swamp and play a mutilate. My opponents creatures die and mine become 1/1 creatures during my first main phase.
On my second main phase I play another swamp. My question is, will my creatures die when I play the second swamp?
Thanks in advanced.
Because people want to sound smart in trying to debunk it when in reality its a fake because of a blurry picture and thats all people need to know. Seriously, just how fast was that card moving for the person to not be able top take a clear picture of a card?
Edit: never mind, I thought it was without paying the cost. Crappy.
I hope they get it fixed before the MTGO release. This is my favorite draft site and I like practicing before release online. They also have mazes end in the regular rare slot I noticed too.
Thank you for the quick reply.
It should be worded as revealing the card and do you mean creatures get -x/-x until the end of turn or put permanent counters on your creatures. Either way its too much of a drawback for me to play just to draw an additional card. Maybe in a control deck where you finishers arent coming down until after turn 6 or so and they are big enough to survive the drawback.