This rule is hilarious, i cant wait to annoy people with it Also knowing that the rc came up with and has not yet changed this rule makes me have even less respect for them than i previously did, and that respect was little to begin with.
Im just a little confused...is this rule saying that you should use a different colored sleeve for your general even when it is shuffled into your deck?
Actually i find sieve, foundry, sword to be 1 card too many, and the cards themselves arent great on their own. Im really loving mind over matter with temple bell, and thopter assembly with time sieve atm.
I think we need an official BANLIST, not an official you shouldnt play this list. What good is a banlist if you dont have any real reason to follow it. Rc needs to grow a pair or wotc needs to take over imo.
Sharuum for me, so much synergy, along with board control and combos...oh and did i mention i love artifacts yah im actually trying to acquire a second sharrum so i can make a non combo build too.
Me and my friends play a lot of multiplayer so i decided to research multiplayer variants. I found edh, built 3 decks so that i could teach people, and then people got hooked. Then when bsa and more so jace came out, many of my friends didnt want to play t2 anymore so now just about all we play is edh.
To me casual is more about the way people play, rather than what they play. Casual for me is chillin with friends and playn some edh. If a game ends on turn 5, thats fine, we can just start another. My primary play group is able to decide when its okay to play infinite combos/ld/lock and when its not...sure i may break out my sharuum deck once per playing session, but then i move on and play something like mayael and others do the same. Competitive on the other hand is when you are at a tourney and are extremely focused on/ serious about the game.
I wasn't going to try to explain, but it's habit with this particular person, since we don't refer to him at the shop by his first name alone, but by both names, as if they were one. Since I often try to write in a more the-way-we-talk style, that's how it happened. No backpedaling, just an honest mistake and result of my own poor editing.
Ok now this i can understand, but i think you will agree that things looked a bit shady without this explanation haha.
Sorry but the way i see it is if you had no intention of of using his full name, then there is no way it could have got in the article...if you wrote it in at some point than you at least thought about using it, even if you intended to take it out...sorry but it seems like you are doing some serious backpedaling here...just sayn
You miss the point where Magic is a Collectible Card Game.
Except once again it is you who are making it a collectible card game...it is not a collectible card game to the pros out there for instance, all you can really say about mtg is that it is a game, trying to add a purpose to it is only going to be subjective, and subjective arguments are just sooo easy to pick apart
Really, because whenever someone criticizes it the first response is typically "its only a guide line, do whatever you want".
Ok now this i can understand, but i think you will agree that things looked a bit shady without this explanation haha.
Sorry but the way i see it is if you had no intention of of using his full name, then there is no way it could have got in the article...if you wrote it in at some point than you at least thought about using it, even if you intended to take it out...sorry but it seems like you are doing some serious backpedaling here...just sayn
Except once again it is you who are making it a collectible card game...it is not a collectible card game to the pros out there for instance, all you can really say about mtg is that it is a game, trying to add a purpose to it is only going to be subjective, and subjective arguments are just sooo easy to pick apart