2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on Bill C-16, Transgender Rights and Anti-Discrimmination Practice in Canada
    What exactly are we debating here? You've brought up a lot of related-but-separate points and it is unclear to me what sort of argument is being made here.
    Posted in: Debate
  • 4

    posted a message on Mothership spoilers 10/26 Ludevic, Kyanios and Tiro and more
    I can't believe that Wizards of the Coast is continuing to support this utter degeneracy. They're complicit with this agenda of making everyone think that cards like Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis are acceptable and should be celebrated. This is an outrage. WotC should be standing up for the values of normal, respectable players instead of catering to the minorities who clearly have a leash on WotC. Making Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis the focus of one of their products just shows that they are growing more bold and reckless. Someone needs to stand up and put a stop to this lunacy. Did we get transported to Bizarro world, where this kind of thing is acceptable? I will be making sure that anyone who is supporting WotC's agenda by playing Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis will be my first target in Commander games, to send a message that their kind is not to be accepted by decent folk.

    Just say NO to group hug!

    W-wait, why are you looking at me like that?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on Spring and Summer Set: Amonkhet and Hour of Devastation
    it would be nice if they made Desert basic land cards (I know its already a land) just like Wastes. and just call it something else.
    That would be horrific. And even without being basic lands I doubt we'd see a Desert reprint due to WotC looking unfavourably upon "archers" as a mechanic over the last few years for mucking up combat math.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Caitlyn Jenner no longer super-awesome transgender spokeswoman of the world.
    Jesus, what? I'm not calling you a bad guy. I'm not trying to mantle MLK. I thought I was having some casual conversation in WCT, insisting that the subject of trans rights is what should be focused on here rather than much broader complaints about modern political discourse, but then I start getting attacked like I was posting in Debate the whole time. If I wanted a debate, I'd post in Debate. I'm not gonna act like a saint in every public interaction, but it's not like all I do is insular or snarky or whatever you'd call it. For example, if I ever trick myself into writing a transgender-in-Magic article for the front page, it'll be open and constructive because an article with bare opinions is not productive. But do I really have to be like that all the time, in every casual environment?

    I'm bowing out now. This ***** is starting to get plenty stressful, and that's not what I asked for by posting in this particular subforum. Congrats on baiting me this far; it's a lot further than I'd normally bother with nowadays.
    Posted in: Talk and Entertainment
  • 2

    posted a message on Caitlyn Jenner no longer super-awesome transgender spokeswoman of the world.
    Quote from Talore »
    Oh, okay. See I thought the whole basic human rights thing was the important issue here. My mistake! :p
    See? This. This is the problem. You're smugly assuming that you're on the side of human rights and anyone who disagrees with you is against human rights. But have you actually read what Jenner said? She's basing her support for Ted Cruz on human rights as she understands them. Now, maybe her understanding is wrong or incomplete. But getting angry or snarky at her isn't going to fix that, is it? Maybe she'll learn something if you have a civil conversation with her. And instead of smugness, try on a little humility. Maybe your understanding is wrong or incomplete, and you'll learn something if you have a civil conversation with her.

    Where did I assume that anyone who disagrees with me is against human rights? I thought I was just pointing out the relative inanity of what you were talking about.

    I have read what Jenner has said, a hell of a lot. She's a major figure in transgender politics, and that directly affects me. I have to be worried about public opinion, about the state of pro- and anti-transgender legislation. These things can severely limit where I can live in North America, and public backlash against things like allowing transgender people to use public washrooms can increase the already significant risk of being harassed or worse on the street (which has happened to me.) I can barely go a week following transgender issues without hearing about Jenner.

    Ultimately, my job is not to sit down with a rich celebrity and try to educate her or have a debate with her. The literature and dialogue is out there; there are people close to her and over the Internet alike trying to educate her, to hear her out and convince her to change her mind. It is her choice to maintain her stance on transgender issues which a vast majority of transgender people do not approve of. As long as a figure with as much influence as Caitlyn Jenner is advocating positions which the majority of transgender people find unhelpful or even harmful, the only thing to do is to denounce her.

    This obstructionism for the sake of obstructionism is infuriating. Transgender people are in an inordinate amount of danger today. Even in Canada, gender identity is still not a protected class in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I can legally be discriminated against for being transgender. Transgender people have extremely high rates for being harassed, raped, murdered, or driven to suicide. Action needs to be taken now, not after the endless intellectual masturbation of trying to achieve impossible levels of objective knowledge. The rights of so many of us must not be fought for passively, begging for the nice people to see our way instead of critiquing those who we feel are obstructing these vital measures of protection.

    How am I the problem? Every day we fail to act, transgender people are victimized or killed. The gears of marginalization and disenfranchisement are greased with apathy. Acting is the only thing we can do. We must not be driven to fear of offending a public figure because we haven't had tea with them. The voices of the majority of transgender people must not be handwaved just because we could be wrong. We are the victims, the ones affected by legislative negligence. We do have authority on these issues. Our voices matter.

    As an aside for those playing at home, one of my favourite games to play is to read something concerning transgender rights and then swap the subject. Turn transgender into black or women/females and see how the post reads. It is an amusing way to spot how similar the arguments being brought up today mirror other movements, such as the civil rights movement in the 60s.
    Posted in: Talk and Entertainment
  • 2

    posted a message on Caitlyn Jenner no longer super-awesome transgender spokeswoman of the world.
    Quote from Talore »
    While not a perfect analogy, she's viewed by many as the trans equivalent of an Uncle Tom.
    *sigh*

    Quote from Talore »
    Nice things like being able to use a public washroom, employers barred from refusing to hire you based on your gender identity, and such?
    Nice things like people talking out their disagreements and a government that actually governs.
    Oh, okay. See I thought the whole basic human rights thing was the important issue here. My mistake! :p
    Posted in: Talk and Entertainment
  • 1

    posted a message on Caitlyn Jenner no longer super-awesome transgender spokeswoman of the world.
    Quote from Wildfire393 »
    Jenner has never been a great spokeswoman for the trans community. Even almost immediately after she publicly came out, she made comments about how fighting for trans rights isn't that important and trans individuals need to work on being less visible.
    Pretty much this. While not a perfect analogy, she's viewed by many as the trans equivalent of an Uncle Tom. It's a shame that many people are only exposed to trans issues through her.
    You have a political party actively trying to roll back the rights earned by gays, blacks, and the poor and you think it's funny they care?
    I think the level of vitriol being displayed because Caitlyn Jenner doesn't profess the political beliefs she's "supposed" to is why we as a country can't have nice things anymore.
    Nice things like being able to use a public washroom, employers barred from refusing to hire you based on your gender identity, and such? It'd really suck to have to worry about not having nice things like that.
    Posted in: Talk and Entertainment
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.