no one from the organization hosting the prelease in my area showed up (so far, it's now an hour past when it was supposed to start). It was on my colleges campus so I have come back to my dorm room.
No I'm threatening to give you a warning because I find it really freaking annoying when people go around with the attitude that no matter what they're innocent and that's the exact thing you're doing. You've posted your bullcrap in multiple threads already and I'm tired of it. Maybe if you'd use your brain for a minute you'd realize that the thread it was in was either 1. deleted or 2. the post itself ended up being deleted. Furthermore as mods we can soft delete threads and posts where only the staff can see them. That's exactly why you don't go into the Forum Control whether it was an error in the usergroup or not. You know, you were originally banned on MTGnews, and I'm starting to see exactly why. All you're warnings are justified and were given under the staff's discretion and judgment which is overall pretty good. Your opinion is of no concern on the matter because obviously you think you're in the right for doing whatever got you your warning and you were obviously wrong, but we cannot convince you of that. This is the end of this discussion. Do not bring it up again.
-Xen.
i was never banned on 'news i got suspended once, mainly for harassing RE, who had abused his power. IF you would learn to read, you would see what i said. ive had said (i think only in a PM) that i dont aruge that it was a discrescretionary (wow i suck at spelling) dicesion, a judgment call, by you, what i said, was these are teh reasons that i felt your judgement was wrong, adn you preoceeded to treat me like ****. Ok. i was polite, i wasn't abusive, or confrontational, until you ignored and responded negatively. Ok, so get all god damned high and mighty ok. I tried, you are the one who started to get rude. You say take responsibility, well, i admit to doing the things in all of the posts i was warned for (except the one that doesn't exist) but what i said was, that the spam warning from teh picture thread was unnecesary, the spam warning for the double post was unnecesary and the flame warning for the MT reject comment was unnecesary. I objected in a civil way, and you did not respond in a civil way.
This is a very good question posed by this thread, because some one does need to watch. I was just threatended in another thread, by an admin, that if i didnt stop asking about my suspension, and trying to show that atleast 2 (if not all) of the warnings were not deserved, that i would be disciplined again. Not because i was breaking a rule, but because i was annoying him..THAT IS A SERIOUS DAMN ABUSE OF POWER IF I EVER SAW ONE.
You know what, you're crusade is really useless and is really getting old, so drop it. Now. You were warned just as everyone else is for things. If you don't drop it you can go visit the Moose because quite honestly one of the things that annoys me most are the people who get warnings or punished as they should but then try and act like they did nothing.
so wait, you are threatening to ban me for not breaking any rules? interesting.
and what annoys me, is when i get warnings for things that don't deserve warnings. Not a single one of my warnings was justified. whats with the one for the post that apparently doesn't exist? Its not like it supposed top go to a post that has been deletedc, THE URL DOES NOT CONTAIN A POST NUMBER. SO I WAS GIVEN A WARNING, THAT WAS CALLED A SPAM WARNING, BUT THERE IS NO EXPLANATION, AND NO POST TO SHOW FOR IT. This is a problem. It appears as though i received a warning for something that never happened.
I'm not breaking any rules, so any furhter attempts at banning or suspension (unless i break a rule) are abuses of power. and i thought you guys were striving to be better than scott.
This could have easily been handled by either the MOD who gave it editing the posts together, informing me of my mistake and having me edit them together, or informing me that i had made a mistake and that in the future to not double post. There was no reason for a warning. IT IS MY ONE AND ONLY DOUBLE POST IN THESE FORUMS. i have been good about going back and editing posts together where necesary.
Notice how the link doesn't go anywhere? Where is this alleged post? There is no number after the show post sh when the link was made, it was not made to a specific post.
Spam Warning - Comment on the Narcissism & Voyeurism thread, deleted.
Senori, who gave this warning, has told me that if given the oppurtunity again, he would merely delete the post and let it be. There was no bnotice in the open post (made my an admin midn you) that the thread was exclusicely for pictures (and that non picture posts weren't alowed).
Flame Warning - Calling ''a member'' a ''inser flame'' 3-year old" on the "Freedom of thought in schools" thread.
I used a simile to compare a members behavior (not the member himself) to a ****ing 3 year old. I didn't call DotP a ****ing 3 year old, i said his behavior (as outlined in the opening post of the thread) was like that of a "****ing 3 year old." (this is the only warning I received that has any validity.
I called a member an "MT reject" because they had been rejected from misetings in a vote by the members. He had been banned (rejected) and thusly, was a reject form there. Not a flame, a mere statement of fact. When you are rejected from a certain thing, you then become a reject by virtue of definition.
Thats five and their reasons.
Yes, thats five, and the reasons why they were bogus.
EDIT: It appears i miss-spoke, i do have 2 double posts (not an attempt to ++ or anything like that, simple mistakes) one received a warning, the other did not. but i was not informed of either of them, and its not like I'm some sort of spammer.
so glad no one got that one while i was gone.
i was never banned on 'news i got suspended once, mainly for harassing RE, who had abused his power. IF you would learn to read, you would see what i said. ive had said (i think only in a PM) that i dont aruge that it was a discrescretionary (wow i suck at spelling) dicesion, a judgment call, by you, what i said, was these are teh reasons that i felt your judgement was wrong, adn you preoceeded to treat me like ****. Ok. i was polite, i wasn't abusive, or confrontational, until you ignored and responded negatively. Ok, so get all god damned high and mighty ok. I tried, you are the one who started to get rude. You say take responsibility, well, i admit to doing the things in all of the posts i was warned for (except the one that doesn't exist) but what i said was, that the spam warning from teh picture thread was unnecesary, the spam warning for the double post was unnecesary and the flame warning for the MT reject comment was unnecesary. I objected in a civil way, and you did not respond in a civil way.
Cocoon.
The natural.
EDIT: the post i referenced http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showpost.php?p=56131&postcount=25
so wait, you are threatening to ban me for not breaking any rules? interesting.
and what annoys me, is when i get warnings for things that don't deserve warnings. Not a single one of my warnings was justified. whats with the one for the post that apparently doesn't exist? Its not like it supposed top go to a post that has been deletedc, THE URL DOES NOT CONTAIN A POST NUMBER. SO I WAS GIVEN A WARNING, THAT WAS CALLED A SPAM WARNING, BUT THERE IS NO EXPLANATION, AND NO POST TO SHOW FOR IT. This is a problem. It appears as though i received a warning for something that never happened.
I'm not breaking any rules, so any furhter attempts at banning or suspension (unless i break a rule) are abuses of power. and i thought you guys were striving to be better than scott.
This could have easily been handled by either the MOD who gave it editing the posts together, informing me of my mistake and having me edit them together, or informing me that i had made a mistake and that in the future to not double post. There was no reason for a warning. IT IS MY ONE AND ONLY DOUBLE POST IN THESE FORUMS. i have been good about going back and editing posts together where necesary.
Notice how the link doesn't go anywhere? Where is this alleged post? There is no number after the show post sh when the link was made, it was not made to a specific post.
Senori, who gave this warning, has told me that if given the oppurtunity again, he would merely delete the post and let it be. There was no bnotice in the open post (made my an admin midn you) that the thread was exclusicely for pictures (and that non picture posts weren't alowed).
I used a simile to compare a members behavior (not the member himself) to a ****ing 3 year old. I didn't call DotP a ****ing 3 year old, i said his behavior (as outlined in the opening post of the thread) was like that of a "****ing 3 year old." (this is the only warning I received that has any validity.
I called a member an "MT reject" because they had been rejected from misetings in a vote by the members. He had been banned (rejected) and thusly, was a reject form there. Not a flame, a mere statement of fact. When you are rejected from a certain thing, you then become a reject by virtue of definition.
Yes, thats five, and the reasons why they were bogus.
EDIT: It appears i miss-spoke, i do have 2 double posts (not an attempt to ++ or anything like that, simple mistakes) one received a warning, the other did not. but i was not informed of either of them, and its not like I'm some sort of spammer.