Regardless, the point remains that Archythagoras praising Einstein in a message of support for a Christian view is silly because whatever he was exactly, he was definitely not Christian, I mean, he almost outright called Christianity childish.
Wow how long has it been and you plebeians are still arguing about something I said lol. I been in the hole for almost a month and this is the discourse I come back to?
I am guessing my next ban will either be permanent or a year long so let's make this quick.
Let me just explain something for Ye since you obviously have a hard time with reading comprehension.
Einstien was referenced in support of deterministic physics and nothing to do with Christianity, his deterministic physics support my theories on chemical and biological evolution.
Einstein's deterministic physics supports an atheistic (Einstein's 'god' doesn't fit with most peoples idea of the word. I've done some research and apparently he meant a sort of fundamental driving force or substance that lends some sense of purpose, but nothing intelligent or truly apparent) worldview because Einstein's deterministic physics supports evolution and cosmology. The theory of evolution by natural selection is not dependent on mutations and assortment variations being random, only that they are highly variable and not according to some factor outside the organism itself. Randomness, however, is the simplest explanation because it requires no determining factor and accounts for all possible patterns.
The problem with you invoking Einstein in support of your views is that the only reason to quote Einstein is to lend some sort of credibility or authority to your point, but when the person you are quoting disagree with the ultimate point you are supporting, that takes away a lot of any extra credibility or authority you could get.
Especially when you quoted him like this:
Without Darwinism, atheism is as worthy for consideration as the existence of Peter Pan.
It is not the mutation that has a mind, but it is the Logos that is at work in all things.
Events considered random by humans are mere illusions due to our ignorance.
Even one of the greatest physicists agrees and stated quite succinctly;
"God does not play dice"
Nothing you said makes any sense in light of the quote.
In fact, the quote backs up my sentiment while you just look like you are blabbering about nothing, hoping that the audience does not notice you are not very smart.
God bless.
What I said was that quoting someone who supports very much opposed positions to you simply because of one tiny mostly entirely irrelevant thing to the discussion at hand that he does shares with you is dumb. The only reason to reference him is to lend authority to your point, but given Einstein's views answer the objection you are trying to make (evolution by natural selection does not need random mutations, only spontaneous ones), it doesn't get you any.
Little own that your posts here mostly argue against opposing worldviews when the thread is clearly not about that and is about discussing the nature of each person's belief, their philosophy when it comes to the notion of belief. If all you want to do here is basically insult and demean others views and tout your supposedly enlightened ones then you have come to the wrong place because why I made this thread was to engage religious belief from an entirely different angle than most discussions, and that there are people like you who seem refusee to have that discussion is exactly why I think it's important to try to have.
I implored the audience with this same plea much before you, do you enjoy stealing my ideas?
When I tried to follow the rules set down in the OP I was subsequently banned.
Surprised I am not banned now, I guess people are wising up and really wanting to see you get ground into the dirt.
You make no sense and anyone that follows your ridiculous lines of thought will become dumber in the process.
Regardless, the point remains that Archythagoras praising Einstein in a message of support for a Christian view is silly because whatever he was exactly, he was definitely not Christian, I mean, he almost outright called Christianity childish.
Wow how long has it been and you plebeians are still arguing about something I said lol. I been in the hole for almost a month and this is the discourse I come back to?
I am guessing my next ban will either be permanent or a year long so let's make this quick.
Let me just explain something for Ye since you obviously have a hard time with reading comprehension.
Einstien was referenced in support of deterministic physics and nothing to do with Christianity, his deterministic physics support my theories on chemical and biological evolution.
Einstein's deterministic physics supports an atheistic (Einstein's 'god' doesn't fit with most peoples idea of the word. I've done some research and apparently he meant a sort of fundamental driving force or substance that lends some sense of purpose, but nothing intelligent or truly apparent) worldview because Einstein's deterministic physics supports evolution and cosmology. The theory of evolution by natural selection is not dependent on mutations and assortment variations being random, only that they are highly variable and not according to some factor outside the organism itself. Randomness, however, is the simplest explanation because it requires no determining factor and accounts for all possible patterns.
The problem with you invoking Einstein in support of your views is that the only reason to quote Einstein is to lend some sort of credibility or authority to your point, but when the person you are quoting disagree with the ultimate point you are supporting, that takes away a lot of any extra credibility or authority you could get.
Especially when you quoted him like this:
Without Darwinism, atheism is as worthy for consideration as the existence of Peter Pan.
It is not the mutation that has a mind, but it is the Logos that is at work in all things.
Events considered random by humans are mere illusions due to our ignorance.
Even one of the greatest physicists agrees and stated quite succinctly;
"God does not play dice"
Nothing you said makes any sense in light of the quote.
In fact, the quote backs up my sentiment while you just look like you are blabbering about nothing, hoping that the audience does not notice you are not very smart.
Hey DJK how about you tell me what you think about that definition.
Lets get down and dirty.
If a God existed would the Logos be enough to encompass the term?
I implored the audience with this same plea much before you, do you enjoy stealing my ideas?
When I tried to follow the rules set down in the OP I was subsequently banned.
Surprised I am not banned now, I guess people are wising up and really wanting to see you get ground into the dirt.
You make no sense and anyone that follows your ridiculous lines of thought will become dumber in the process.
Till next time.
Sup.
Nothing you said makes any sense in light of the quote.
In fact, the quote backs up my sentiment while you just look like you are blabbering about nothing, hoping that the audience does not notice you are not very smart.
God bless.