2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Burn
    Do current results warrent a shift to Nacatl's? SCG Indy featured a win from and the highest ranked finishes from Burn decks running the cat (I believe 4of the 5 top finishing burn decks ran Nacatl.)

    In testing I have been incredibly back and forth on it, but it seems to have its advantages, especially against pro-red cards and in a format where burn usually needs consistent damage to win.

    For reference I am currently playing Naya-AC burn without Nacatl.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Reanimated Kaalia of the Vast
    Quote from TheLoneN00b »
    What are your thoughts on Archangel Avacyn? Seems cheap enough to actually get some use out of the flash. And although she kills Kaalia if she flips, nearly any other creature you run will remain alive.


    Hello!

    Archangel Avacyn is not my first pick. If I wanted instant-based indestructibility, I would choose Boros Charm first. As a creature, Archangel Avacyn isn't as strong as other creatures in the 5 CMC slot. In my multiplayer games, I don't expect to have many creatures out, so I don't have much to protect via Archangel Avacyn. At most, I have 3 creatures, including Kaalia, at any given moment. Since I don't have much to protect, Archangel Avacyn's flipped side will not trigger often. Even if she does flip, her 3 damage is OK, but I have Balefire Dragon and Steel Hellkite to clean up the board, even if they cost more to hardcast. Balefire Dragon is something I want to launch from Kaalia's ability.

    For my deck, I am going for the long game, so every creature needs to have a significant effect on the battlefield. I don't think Archangel Avacyn is good enough to meet my multiplayer needs.


    Fair points. So then if you were to add more creatures to your list, which ones would you be looking into? I'm currently looking to add some more to mine.

    Great list by the way, Definitely inspired some card choices in my own.
    Posted in: Multiplayer Commander Decklists
  • posted a message on Reanimated Kaalia of the Vast
    What are your thoughts on Archangel Avacyn? Seems cheap enough to actually get some use out of the flash. And although she kills Kaalia if she flips, nearly any other creature you run will remain alive.
    Posted in: Multiplayer Commander Decklists
  • posted a message on Burn
    Should I even bother playing Bedlam Reveler? Seems like a pipedream, even from the sideboard.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    That kind of parallels my current thinking. I've been running the following list for months to great success but have really only found myself siding Firewalker in for the mirror, and even then I see the match up far less than anything else.



    My current consideration is swapping the Firewalkers for 2 Exquisite Firecraft, as the Nahiri decks seem to be getting popular, and we tend to lose control match ups by not squeaking out the last few points of damage.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    Is Firewalker still worth a spot in the sideboard? Seems less and less people are playing burn these days and I find maybe only one match per tournament where I bring him in
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    So if we all hate Nacatl so much (which I do as well) then why is it performing the best?
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    For those of you who dropped Atarka's Command, mind sharing your thoughts on why? There's been a huge spike of burn in my area and I'm tempted to give Boros Drev a shot despite how much I like AC.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    To me I wouldn't even drop Atarka's in a burn heavy meta, as you can easily side them out games 2 and 3. Game 1 it's not even terrible in the mirror as it combats opposing Helixes and can potentially save a Swiftspear or 2.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    Thanks again for the report. Have you considered running both Atarka's and Skullcrack? To me Atarka's is either Boros Charm 5-8 or Skullcrack 5-8.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    I find it kind of amusing that in terms of top 32 decks, every burn list at GP LA ran Nacatl and every list at GP Charlotte didn't.

    Thoughts? Coincidence?
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    Thoughts on Shard Volley? I kind of want to test a singleton in the mainboard as an additional 1-mana 3 damage card, but I'm worried about the sacrificing a land clause screwing me over. Is it worth it?
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    Quote from Wukfric »
    I totaly agree about overboarding. I'm just saying if you feal comfortable with it Palm is a card that would be of definite value in the Burn mirror.


    I don't -exactly- see it as overboarding, seeing as Helix and Skullcrack still completely go with our gameplan. I'm gonna keep trying my plan and see how it fairs. If it keeps failing me I'll reevaluate it.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    Quote from GoldenOldBoy »
    Quote from TheLoneN00b »
    Yeah I knew it was a flimsy idea.

    Also, am I just playing the mirror incorrectly? I've been losing against it the last couple games and I'm starting to feel it's not just down to better draws. I tend to focus creatures early game . Side out Atarka's Command, Boros Charm and Eidolon (Draw) / Lava Spike (Play) for Firewalker, Path, Palm, Helix and Skullcrack.

    You're bringing in Deflecting Palm for the mirror? That seems a little reactive rather than proactive. I'm not exactly sure, but I'm going to shoot in the dark and guess that you might over-sideboard a few games. Try not to bring out as many cards between games in the mirror, even if you really think you need the extra spots. It probably goes without saying that critical mass is important in Burn, and every card taken out that does damage dilutes the possibility of winning by a small margin. How close do the games get, if I can ask? What happens to make you lose?


    I may just be making incorrect plays, such as Skullcracking too reactively when I have Firewalker in play, or being too afraid to lose Firewalker if they Skullcrack. (Which is still a 2-for-1 so I should be OK with it.)

    Here's my current list:


    Based on analysis and card choice, here's my current sideboard plan for the mirror:

    On the play:
    - 4 Atarka's Command
    - 4 Lava Spike
    - 1 Boros Charm
    + 2 Firewalker
    + 3 Path to Exile
    + 2 Lightning Helix
    + 2 Skullcrack

    On the draw:
    - 4 Atarka's Command
    - 4 Eidolon of the Great Revel
    - 3 Lava Spike
    + 2 Firewalker
    + 3 Path to Exile
    + 2 Lightning Helix
    + 2 Skullcrack
    + 2 Deflecting Palm

    Atarka's isn't worth the damage for green mana, Path kills Firewalker and creatures are also very important in this matchup, and the rest are obvious. Thoughts?
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on Burn
    Yeah I knew it was a flimsy idea.

    Also, am I just playing the mirror incorrectly? I've been losing against it the last couple games and I'm starting to feel it's not just down to better draws. I tend to focus creatures early game . Side out Atarka's Command, Boros Charm and Eidolon (Draw) / Lava Spike (Play) for Firewalker, Path, Palm, Helix and Skullcrack.
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.