Well crap. Now I'm not going to have anywhere to ask rules questions or scope out cool deck lists for various formats.
In my opinion this has been the best resource for the game. Now I'm just wander around the internet trying to find a substitute. Bullocks I tell you!
- Perodequeso
- Registered User
-
Member for 10 years, 10 months, and 19 days
Last active Tue, Apr, 23 2024 16:10:46
- 0 Followers
- 652 Total Posts
- 165 Thanks
-
Nov 30, 2017Perodequeso posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemI agree with the vast majority of this opinion piece, however: in one paragraph it states that policing peoples thoughts is abhorrent, and in another paragragh it states one should be OK with shooting people for their thoughts.Posted in: Articles
Nazis in Normandy were an occupying force waging a war of aggresson and comitting human rights violations. Modern American nazis are just a**holes with their heads lodged, we should shoot them? If and when they become violent prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law sure, but to espouse idealogical violence is dangerous, extreme thinking. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I'm thinking that since Festival prevents creatures from being able to attack technically means that they "could not attack" that turn. Because Season of the Witch is looking for whether they could attack its EOT trigger won't take effect.
Am I correct in this?
Just found this myself, but thank you for doing the legwork. I see where I was not comprehending it correctly.
Well s*** howdy, thanks.
So the rub is, they claimed that since the 2/2 was no longer on the battlefield when Psionic Blast resolved its caster would not take the 2 damage.
I am under the impression that even if the target is no longer there when Psionic Blast resolves, its caster still takes the two damage. The two damage the caster is dealt is not contingent upon the first four damage being dealt. Am I (mostly) correct in this interpretation of things?
That was my thought about the Falcon.
My original question was going to be about tapping lands before phasing out during the untap step, which I know cannot happen.
Was watching a video about a banding themed EDH deck and the poster got his rules wrong and I wanted to correct him. But before I felt I could correct him I wanted to make sure that I myself was correct.
I'm leaning towards the latter because I was under the impression that all blocks had to be legal when banding was used defensively.
A card like Double Negative would be needed to counter both.
But either way thanks.
I'm assuming that the germane rules text is "during your NEXT draw step", meaning that the delayed trigger only triggers the once, if not payed for.
I'm almost certain that IRL using today's rules that's not how Nafs Asp's delayed trigger works, and that it only triggers once during your next draw step if you do not pay the 1.
Is my line of thinking correct, or does that ability stick around until payed for?