Cogwork Librarian (4)
Artifact Creature - Construct
Disposable (If you're not drafting, just tear this card up because you will never ever use it. If you are drafting, tear it up after the draft is finished. Then spit on it.)
3/3
...no? Because people keep cards to draft with more than once? If that's not something you're interested in you obviously wouldn't be buying this product in the first place.
I don't think this one card's worthlessness indicates the entire set, unknown as yet, does not merit interest.
Cogwork Librarian (4)
Artifact Creature - Construct
Disposable (If you're not drafting, just tear this card up because you will never ever use it. If you are drafting, tear it up after the draft is finished. Then spit on it.)
3/3
Arenson's Aura at common could be interesting, especially for the hexproof mirror match.
Also common in Ice Age, not yet common on MTGO, and played in Vintage: Mystic Remora. Hm, I just checked realized Arenson's Aura is not available at all on MTGO. I must have been thinking of Teferi's Care.
And @ LordDowney: Goblin Grenade is something I always wish was Pauper legal.
"Will you answer yes or no to the next question I ask you?"
If they answer "yes", your second question should be:
"Will you concede now?"
If they answer "no", you second question should be:
"Will you wait any longer before conceding?"
Edit: I am told that "If I asked you to concede to me, would the answer to that question be the same as the answer to this one?" forces a concession by itself.
Close, but I doubt it- Frogmite counts toward affinity, while Marshmist Titan is almost the opposite of what you would want in a deck that strives towards devotion to black (high CMC, only one mana of which is colored).
Rule Change: The "Planeswalker Uniqueness Rule" and the "Legend Rule"
Two rule changes introduced with the Magic 2014 core set impact how cards in the Born of the Gods set function.
Under the previous rules, if there were two or more legendary permanents with the same name on the battlefield or two or more planeswalkers that share a subtype (such as "Jace") on the battlefield, they would all be put into their owners' graveyards as a state-based action. These rules have changed. The new rules are as follows:
704.5j If a player controls two or more planeswalkers that share a planeswalker type, that player chooses one of them, and the rest are put into their owners' graveyards. This is called the "planeswalker uniqueness rule."
704.5k If a player controls two or more legendary permanents with the same name, that player chooses one of them, and the rest are put into their owners' graveyards. This is called the "legend rule."
What do you think? Looks like Planeswalkers and Legends got their power boosted...
I think sometimes people don't put enough importance on the difference between discard -> draw versus draw -> discard. The first is vastly inferior to the second.
I have a regular and foil and am curious what's a fair price to ask for them.
Anyone have any insight? Is it worth more or less than the RTR version?
Also, it helps that Aaron Forsythe made a fairly explicit statement that there would always be an eternal tribal online format.
I will just say that's a big leap to make from the current info.
On the other hand, you've made some good guesses in the past... guess we'll wait and see.
I don't think this one card's worthlessness indicates the entire set, unknown as yet, does not merit interest.
Cogwork Librarian (4)
Artifact Creature - Construct
Disposable (If you're not drafting, just tear this card up because you will never ever use it. If you are drafting, tear it up after the draft is finished. Then spit on it.)
3/3
Also common in Ice Age, not yet common on MTGO, and played in Vintage: Mystic Remora. Hm, I just checked realized Arenson's Aura is not available at all on MTGO. I must have been thinking of Teferi's Care.
And @ LordDowney: Goblin Grenade is something I always wish was Pauper legal.
First Question:
"Will you answer yes or no to the next question I ask you?"
If they answer "yes", your second question should be:
"Will you concede now?"
If they answer "no", you second question should be:
"Will you wait any longer before conceding?"
Edit: I am told that "If I asked you to concede to me, would the answer to that question be the same as the answer to this one?" forces a concession by itself.
Apparently they're not new rules so much as they're new to me.
But yay post x 69.
Close, but I doubt it- Frogmite counts toward affinity, while Marshmist Titan is almost the opposite of what you would want in a deck that strives towards devotion to black (high CMC, only one mana of which is colored).
I would be happy to be proven wrong, though.
Please let it be Matt Tabak.
Rule Change: The "Planeswalker Uniqueness Rule" and the "Legend Rule"
Two rule changes introduced with the Magic 2014 core set impact how cards in the Born of the Gods set function.
Under the previous rules, if there were two or more legendary permanents with the same name on the battlefield or two or more planeswalkers that share a subtype (such as "Jace") on the battlefield, they would all be put into their owners' graveyards as a state-based action. These rules have changed. The new rules are as follows:
704.5j If a player controls two or more planeswalkers that share a planeswalker type, that player chooses one of them, and the rest are put into their owners' graveyards. This is called the "planeswalker uniqueness rule."
704.5k If a player controls two or more legendary permanents with the same name, that player chooses one of them, and the rest are put into their owners' graveyards. This is called the "legend rule."
What do you think? Looks like Planeswalkers and Legends got their power boosted...
I'm hoping that add least one common is included/rarity-shifted that will add a new deck type to Pauper. Animate Dead at common might do the trick.
As long as I'm dreaming, Trygon Predator at common would be pretty sweet, too.
Oh, and please print more Hydro/Pyroblast, Wizards.
Far better than either, though seldom seen, is "discard, then draw."