2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Altered Angus Mackenzie by Rk Post :v
    Hello guys

    Rk Post visited our country like two weeks ago. At that meeting, my friends and I were playing in a EDH tournament. So I asked him to alter my commander.

    This is the result.


    Posted in: Artwork
  • posted a message on [THS] "God" Mechanic
    Quote from Elite_Inquisitor
    Maybe the P/T box will actually indicate something else, like a starting divinity stat or something, I'd found it weird for gods to take a tragic slip, but who knows.


    Totally agree
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on returning fixed mechanic
    * Of the other two mechanics, one is a repeated mechanic brought back that strongly hits the flavor of Greek mythology;
    * the second returning mechanic is a mechanic that the developers thought had potential but didn’t live up to it first time out - it has been mechanically retweaked and given a new name and flavor. This last mechanic is also tied to the gods
    * The set does something that's never done before except on another Future Sight card.

    My guess...

    First one.. Champion or Epic

    And for the one that developers tought it had potential, I think is Gravestorm. I think this because they said that the set does something (a mechanic) that's never done befores on another future Sight Card. So the only mechanic I found that only appears in just one card is Gravestorm

    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [[M14]] M14 draft simulator
    This is my pool

    Creatures:
    1 [M14] Syphon Sliver
    2 [M14] Goblin Shortcutter
    2 [M14] Striking Sliver
    1 [M14] Angelic Wall
    1 [M14] Sentinel Sliver
    1 [M14] Giant Spider
    5 [M14] Predatory Sliver
    Spells:
    1 [M14] Doom Blade
    2 [M14] Seismic Stomp
    1 [M14] Shock
    3 [M14] Hive Stirrings
    1 [M14] Fog
    3 [M14] Lay of the Land
    1 [M14] Trollhide
    1 [M14] Elixir of Immortality
    Lands:
    2 [M11] Swamp
    4 [M11] Mountain
    3 [M11] Plains
    7 [M11] Forest

    Sideboard:
    SB: 1 [M14] Pillarfield Ox
    SB: 1 [M14] Tome Scour
    SB: 1 [M14] Smelt
    SB: 1 [M14] Divine Favor
    SB: 1 [M14] Dark Favor
    SB: 1 [M14] Nightwing Shade
    SB: 2 [M14] Goblin Shortcutter
    SB: 1 [M14] Lightning Talons
    SB: 1 [M14] Academy Raider
    SB: 1 [M14] Act of Treason
    SB: 1 [M14] Cyclops Tyrant
    SB: 1 [M14] Thunder Strike
    SB: 1 [M14] Wild Guess
    SB: 1 [M14] Naturalize
    SB: 1 [M14] Sporemound
    SB: 1 [M14] Island
    SB: 1 [M14] Mountain
    SB: 1 [M14] Swamp
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[THS]] Elspeth in Theros
    Quote from mithril ax
    MIND = BLOWN



    duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudeeeee why I didn't think about that?!?!?!!

    WEll.. I've just spent like 1 hour reading all these pages and I saw something about Karm 2.0, but where is the img??? o_O
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[DGM]] Stuff
    I don't know if those stuffs are real...

    Hidden Strings is to lightning bolt as Hands of Binding is to Shock

    both are commons too.. and both in the same block??? srsly?

    I don't believe that.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [[DGM]] Mirko Vosk, Mind Drinker
    Quote from Lyciana
    Should have been a 4/4 (or at least a 3/4) and milled until he hit X lands where X is the damage dealt. Then he would have been interesting.


    This is pointless.

    4/4 or 3/4 that mills until hit X lands where X is the damage dealt is worst than a 2/4 that will always mill until 4 when it hits.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Kaalia + Master of Cruelties
    Quote from Shmo40
    This isn't the comprehensive rules but it is from WOTC R&D:

    https://twitter.com/TabakRules/status/321489585358127105

    edit: the guru of all rules gurus knows his comprehensive rules.

    edit 2: 509.4g for Attacks / Attacks & Isn't Blocked difference.


    They're in comprehensive rules

    for Attack and isn't blocked:
    509.4g An ability that reads “Whenever [this creature] attacks and isn’t blocked, . . .” triggers if no
    creatures are declared as blockers for that creature. It won’t trigger if the attacking creature is
    blocked and then all its blockers are removed from combat.

    for Attack:
    508.2a Abilities that trigger on a creature attacking trigger only at the point the creature is declared
    as an attacker. They will not trigger if a creature attacks and then that creature’s characteristics
    change to match the ability’s trigger condition.
    Example: A permanent has the ability “Whenever a green creature attacks, destroy that
    creature at end of combat.” If a blue creature attacks and is later turned green, the
    ability will not trigger.


    About Kalia:
    "9/22/2011 The creature card is already tapped and attacking as it's put onto the battlefield. Any abilities that trigger when a creature becomes tapped or when a creature attacks won't trigger for that card."

    This applies for the Attack trigger (508.2a)

    There's a post where we talked about this
    http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=502245&page=6
    Posted in: Rumored Card Rulings
  • posted a message on the banning of beck // call in modern.
    Quote from Serpos of Urug
    Sheldon has said he doesn't consider Deadeye a problem, probably because Sheldon rarely considers combo to be a problem.


    I hope you're right =(
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on the banning of beck // call in modern.
    As EDH player i'm worried about the edh banlist. Don't know if they will ban beck//Call or just ban Deadeye Navigator Frown
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [DGM] Master of Cruelties
    Quote from Kahedron
    Same as with guiltfeeder it is not a traditional attacks trigger, just like the Eldrazi titans don't have traditional LTB.

    The rules that apply to abilities that fire off a creature being declared as an attacker like Geist of Saint Traft do not apply to abilities of creatures that fire when they go unblocked.

    Again regardless of how master of cruelties is in combat an not blocked it will fire off the ability.



    Note the above rule does not state it only triggers if the creature was declared as an attacker.


    oh thanks! that was the rule I was looking for, but i didn't found it. Now this is clear! Kalia works
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [DGM] Master of Cruelties
    Quote from Kahedron


    This is incorrect, like guiltfeeder this guy only cares that he is in combat and attacking at the beginning of the declare blockers step and has not been blocked. It does not matter how he is put into combat he will trigger and reduce your opponents life to one.


    There's nothing that says that you can check one part of the clause and not the other. Ok.. Master is attacking, but wasn't declare as an attacker.

    Kalia's rule says that won't trigger any "attacks" or "tapped" triggers of any creature she puts into the battlefield.

    "9/22/2011 The creature card is already tapped and attacking as it's put onto the battlefield. Any abilities that trigger when a creature becomes tapped or when a creature attacks won't trigger for that card."

    this is a rule. Why we have to just check is it wasn't blocked? and don't check the attack clause?
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [DGM] Master of Cruelties
    Quote from Maben


    Quote from ECrownofFire
    No, it works. His ability triggers at the declare blockers step (see rulings on Ferrel's Zealot, Keeper of Tresserhorn, Orcish Squatters, etc). Kaalia's ability triggers at the declare attackers step, so he's good to go for the declare blockers step.


    Nice job on the links, most would be too lazy :D. Are you absolutely positive here though? It seems like it might have an "if" clause as to whether or not it attacked. Similar to something like Test of Endurance that will not trigger if the requirement is not met, I feel like it might trigger at the blockers step, but retroactively check if it "attacked".

    Can we get some more input here? Cause if it works then it's a shoe-in for my Kaalia deck cause it's just crazy. If it doesn't then it is lackluster at best.


    No it won't trigger. When the rule says that it trigger at the end of blockers step, it means that the trigger will put on the stack at that time, but it will check previous information. the creature wasn't declare as an attacker.

    Now this is what Kalia's rules say:

    9/22/2011 The creature card is already tapped and attacking as it's put onto the battlefield. Any abilities that trigger when a creature becomes tapped or when a creature attacks won't trigger for that card.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Ninjutsu + Master of Cruelty
    I prefer let it get to one and then cast any burn spell XD
    Posted in: Rumored Card Rulings
  • posted a message on [[DGM]] Render Silent - FNM find
    Quote from BladewingX

    Quote from Profani
    So now there's Counterflux, Voidslime, Undermine and Render Silent to complete the cycle.

    Actually, the Invasion Block cards already were a full cycle:
    Absorb
    Undermine
    Suffocating Blast
    Mystic Snake

    Ravnica 1 had two such cards:
    Swift Silence
    Voidslime

    Alara as well:
    Punish Ignorance
    Double Negative

    And Ravnica 2 just got its third one:
    Render Silent
    Counterflux
    Mystic Genesis

    So actually, this card didn't complete the cycle, it just gets our hopes high for a UUB one.


    Double Negative too..


    Now... this card will see modern. Stops CAscade! For example (and i know this card is banned) if your opp plays Bloodbraid Elf, then you can response to the Cascade. So you counter the elf and your op won't be able to cast the 2nd card.

    It can stops combos. For example, Second Sunrise combo where allways is using artifacts to draw and cast more artifacts.

    Finally, I think is great for EDH Grin
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.