2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 3

    posted a message on Iconic Masters ignores the first half of Magic
    It's simple - they have set design down to a science. I bet these sets practically build themselves - let's throw the dragon package in there, let's use these mythics and the commons/uncommons build themselves. I bet R&D on these sets is a fraction of new sets.

    These are fancier FTV's. It's a cheap way to leverage cards that are expensive on the secondary market while at the same time getting value for their limited game design and making people rip packs. This whole set made me yawn except for Mana Drain.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 2

    posted a message on What's Wrong With Today's Magic?
    I will give you an example. I live on the border of Wisconsin and Illinois in the mid west of America.

    10 years ago we had 4 maybe 5 LGS to choose from. These were the days of 40-70 player FNMs. Pre releases and release parties were huge. Depending on the set, 100+ players.

    5 years ago we had around a dozen LGS. FNMs were around 30-50 players. This is about the time they went away from release events and only had pre release events. Still most LGS had 50+ per flight for pre release events.

    1 year ago we had 18-20 LGS to choose from. To the credit of some of the LGS owners, they are working together and shifting 'FNM' to Saturdays or Mondays. LGS 1 runs Standard on Friday night, while LGS 2 runs Modern, and LGS 3 has EDH. ON Saturday they switch formats and then again on Mondays. I can play any format any day of the week. Which is cool for the player base.

    With in the last year we have had 6-8 new LGS open. Some dont run scheduled events. Some run non conventional events. Some are competing with the 18-20 for players.

    I have over 2 dozen LGS I can choose from all with in 60 minutes from my house. The game has done nothing but grow in my area. Every FNM there are new players getting a DCI number. I understand not every where is probably the same. I live in a highly populated area.


    Am I the only person who read this and thinks your LGS are cannibalizing each other and not actually growing? They're fighting over the same local players? Local stores opening up isn't growth - if you said you go to GPs in town every year and every year there are more people, that would hold more weight.

    I live in a mid-market city. We're growing, but we still pale in size to somewhere like Atlanta. I see the same players all over town - compared to 5 years ago, player turn out and player growth (increasing # of new faces at events) has been on the decline. A sunday standard tournament that has been firing reliably since I started back (AVR) has not fired in 2 of the last 3 weeks. New LGS pop up, but the old ones shut down as the players migrate to the store featuring the best payouts as a promo to get people in.

    I am worried about Magic and I am especially worried about where it will be in 2 years. I see us going farther down the Yugioh rabbit hole.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on Is the new set enough to get you to play standard again?
    I'll still play but I'm not going to invest much on this release. The new set is the same old bull***** - why do you think they had to toss Invocations *and* full art lands at higher rarity in there?

    I like how the hivemind has caught up to what I've been saying since BFZ released. Lazy ******* designers.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on The Legacy Price Discussion Thread
    Smells like Digiridoo around Theros block but worse. Might drive up the price for a bit, but they're probably not going to print anything that is broken by Fluctuator.
    Posted in: Market Street Café
  • 1

    posted a message on The State of Standard
    Quote from Th3M4g1cM4n »
    Quote from Quacker »
    Bad R&D. It's only going to get worse before it gets better, since R&D works on sets a year or two ahead of when they're released.


    R&D from a game design side or a sales side? From a sales side, I don't understand. Why buy cards if you don't get to play them? I Haven't bought a box since Theros was released (the set, not the block). Mostly because I liked the idea of seeing what I happened to pull and getting my hands on most copies of the commons and uncommons I needed to build a variety of decks. Gimmicks, like the Masterpiece Series don't appeal to me, although I do understand they appeal to other players/collectors. I, however, like playing with my cards and want to use them for the purpose for which they are intended.


    Bad R&D on the game design side is leading to desperate/bad decision on the sales side. Nobody wants bans, but if they're forced because people simply give up on the format...well...it leads to gimmicks like Masterpieces. That and the intrinsic drive of sales to increase sales at all costs.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • 1

    posted a message on The Commander Price Discussion Thread
    Dumbass Rudy and his Alpha Investments scam spread that rumor. It'll be true until next week when WOTC announces a run of Commander decks featuring only Atraxa packs.
    Posted in: Market Street Café
  • 1

    posted a message on The Commander Price Discussion Thread
    So Dig Through Time is $5 now...


    If you want foils, that seems like an OK option right now. 7-8 bucks for NM.

    This is purely Frontier "demand." Smells like Tiny Leaders, but may take off as there are quite a few tournaments firing on the format.

    See also Hangarback Walker, JVP, Anafenza.
    Posted in: Market Street Café
  • 1

    posted a message on Post-Modern Frontier Format
    This format is a janky way to create interest in overprinted cards that have no use otherwise. Speed bump - Magic needs more players or the secondary market is in for a bumpy ride.
    Posted in: Frontier
  • 1

    posted a message on Do not preorder Kaladesh singles
    Quote from Wraith223 »
    Quote from Quacker »
    I really had second thoughts about posting because I try to avoid putting myself out there. I do not post with an agenda and I laid my cards on the table in terms of how much/little I have invested in this set so far. I thought, however, that some players have not been around since BFZ or KTK and have not seen preorder prices crash to almost nothing. Well, I think this set will be an order of magnitude worse than either one of those sets, in terms of packs opened per player. Fastland prices have already dropped by about 10% since the Kaladesh Expeditions were announced. We may see the lesser played fastlands dip to $2 or lower.

    But maybe I'm wrong. I ain't no future seeing wizard even though I play magic. Take what I say with a grain of salt, but to me, this means a total shift in how standard legal set pricing is going to work. The new mega mythics will cause eternal players to "buy in" to standard sets more than if they were after one or two cards. Their purchases for these new mega mythics will cause more pack openings than otherwise. If you don't believe me, that's fine. We'll see how it turns out.

    Also, I am the first to accuse people of having secondary agendas, but when I read your accusation to me, that made me really rethink how I approach internet posts. A healthy dose of skepticism is fine, but really, what could my objective possibly be? To convince all 10 readers of this subforum to not buy preorders so I can watch cards tank and scoop up $200 Mana Vaults instead of $205 Mana Vaults? Get real dude.


    I don't think there are any mana vault powered cards in this new set, thus your point is faulty. Players will still want the standard legal cards and if you enjoy that; getting a cheap preorder may not be a bad idea. Only the fast lands really interest me. A few of the new artifacts look good, but their CMC is high for affinity. When you post ideas that we should not do anything with this set and have such high negativity, viewers here loose interest in reading/communicating in our forum. You said it, 10 people read this. Why? The reasons are that certain members are negative, rude, lack social skills, and think they are god's gift to magic. Thanks for killing the market street. I am being real, and find your thread just spreading negativity to something new. We need new players and more people buying into the game so we can enjoy it for as long as possible.

    "This country (forum) will never fall from an invading force, but instead it will fall from within...."
    Lincoln.


    You should really learn to read before you post. The whole PREMISE of this post is about MANA VAULT being reprinted at mega mythic rarity. Jeesh.

    I think you're the one lacking social graces. I call a spade a spade, and you can't even be bothered to read my posts before heaping disdain upon them. Look in the mirror there sport before you start spouting off about rude people. I'll take rude over dumb any day.

    Also, I am not disputing that historically preordering has been a bad idea. I just think some of you don't get how much of a shift this might be in terms of mythic/rare singles availability. An order of magnitude of depression of singles, and any microscarcities of hot cards resolved in days rather than weeks. Paradigm shifting. Buzzy word, but appropriate I think.
    Posted in: Market Street Café
  • 1

    posted a message on Do not preorder Kaladesh singles
    Quote from secretgiant »
    Homelands? That's a little excessive. As for the fastlands, we have seen rare dual land cycles get to the $2.00 range recently so that's not out of the question. Every experienced player knows to be careful preordering singles- there is no secret about the downward pressure after the set is released. However, Homelands and Fallen Empires? Get real dude. Besides, I don't trust anyone's evaluation of this set yet because: Standard Rotation and Bizarre Mechanics.

    I'm glad if the single market is on the low end. The only reason to be mad is if you're a business or a speculator (you said you're mad about expected speculation losses). I'm glad that budget players that buy packs have a shot at getting something valuable to trade away for staples. I won't consider holding onto or speculating on the value if I open a Masterpiece card, as a high-value card I don't need is not worth it for me.


    I agree that dual lands currently have a track record of getting in the $1.50 range in the past few sets. However, those dual lands had zero eternal implications (beyond EDH). This is the first dual land set with eternal implications since KTK and fetches were definitely not under $2 during that entire run. I fully expected even the janky ones to stay above $3. I am no longer sure.

    Homelands may have been a bit of a hyperbole, but it's in the right direction. Overprinting is overprinting. Before this set, overprinting meant languishing on the shelves. WOTC has a system in place to prevent too much of this - printing to "demand." This set, overprinting may be due to raw over-opening. WOTC keeps printing because they think it's organic demand but it's really not. Unexplored territory, IMHO.

    Anyways, I wish I hadn't even started this thread now. I really don't give a flip what people do.
    Posted in: Market Street Café
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.