2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Magic the Gathering: Tactics
    At its core, I actually really like the concept. The execution is downright awful.

    A lot of people are upset about the cost structure. I am not. I would gladly participate using the cost structure they have set up if the game were fun. Unfortunately, the game is not fun.

    IMO, the interface and graphics are just awful. If they were perfect, this game would be tolerable. I think they could have made the game a lot better by going with a simpler graphics setup, i.e. no 3D, and just focusing in on a really crisp gaming experience with interesting interactions between the "cards."
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [M11] Top 10 for Each Color
    Quote from Pseudofate
    Read Tahn's post

    http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=254812

    Shouldn't mix Commons and Uncommons either. Evaluate the two separately.


    Why? When I open a pack for draft purposes I have to evaluate them together. I actually really dislike the seperate rating system that many writers use, because it does not tell me some vital information.

    To give you a relevant example. I know staggershock is probalby the best common in red for ROE, I could not tell you what uncommons (if any) might be in consideration ahead of it.
    Posted in: Limited Archives
  • posted a message on [M11] Top 10 for Each Color
    Thanks for the comments. You guys sure are harsh. Any other suggestions?
    Posted in: Limited Archives
  • posted a message on [M11] Top 10 for Each Color
    I reviewed all commons and uncommons and created these basic pick orders. I am sure I am misvaluing some cards. I am also sure the lists can never be perfect because cards fluctuate in value depending on your pool/draft. Just wanted to get the discussion started.

    White
    Serra Angel
    Pacifism
    Blinding Mage
    Assault Griffin
    Cloud Crusader
    Wild Griffin
    Condemn
    Stormfront Pegasus
    Mighty Leap
    White Knight

    Blue
    Mind Control
    Jace's Ingenuity
    Air Servant
    Aether Adept
    Azure Drake
    Cloud Elemental
    Scroll Thief
    Mana Leak
    Augury Owl
    Sleep

    Black
    Doom Blade
    Quag Sickness
    Corrupt
    Howling Banshee
    Sign in Blood
    Assasinate
    Liliana's Specter
    Gravedigger
    Black Knight
    Child of Night

    Red
    Fireball
    Lightning Bolt
    Chandra's Outrage
    Act of Treason
    Ember Hauler
    Beserkers of Blood Ridge
    Vulshok Berserker
    Prodigal Pyromancer
    Manic Vandal
    Fire Servant


    Green
    Garruks' Packleader
    Garruk's Companion
    Llanowar Elves
    Cudgel Troll
    Yavimaya Wurm
    Spined Wurm
    Giant Spider
    Cultivate
    Greater Basilisk
    Duskdale Wurm
    Posted in: Limited Archives
  • posted a message on Cascading Agony Combo
    Yeah, this is a really interesting interaction. In my view, noone can possibly identify a definitive answer given the rules as they currently stand.
    Posted in: Decks for Critique
  • posted a message on Cranial Insertion: Two Numbered Polyhedrons
    Even if it turns out the "wrong" answer was printed. I'm really happy to see that this issue was brought to the forefront. These cool interactions, are really interesting to read about.
    Posted in: Articles
  • posted a message on Cascade Swans Tech
    Favor of the mighty. And then play rafiq and other 4 cc creatures of your own.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on "Warp World Revolution" tops at Illinois PTQ
    Seems like in todays world you have to have a plan game 1 against swans... This may be something to just file away and pull back out once swans dies down. I'm expecting to see 20%+ of the filed at most ptqs to be cascade swans.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Peek-A-Boo (u/w control)
    I like this deck, but how can we possibly justify running telepathy? At least peek replaces itself. The fact is, most of the time you should know what to call without casting peek, but i do think having peek is worth it.

    Also, this deck should be running 4-8 nonbasics max imo. One of the best advantages this deck has is that it can avoid anathemancer effectively.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Regional results
    So hard to judge a metagame. I played 5c bloodbraid. Played g/w tokens (drew in game 3), lost to mirror that ran captured sunlight main, lost to old school 5cc, then beat old choold 5cc.

    The captured sunlight deck was a total beating even with anathemancer. back to back turns he went bituminous blast -> sunlight -> finks. So uh, despite drawing 3 anathemancers, I lost.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Chapin's Bloodbraided Elf Deck
    I love bituminous blast, but what the heck matchup are they good against? They seem to come out in every single matchup, and not in a way that makes sense.
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Chapin's Bloodbraided Elf Deck
    I'm just confused though because needle has a good target in every single matchup. Its obvioulsy not maindeck for a reason though. My guess is because its reactive instead of proactive. The question I'm trying to have answered, is what deck is it that you want the reactive card instead of the proactive card?
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Chapin's Bloodbraided Elf Deck
    Quote from "[hizzouse »
    Jin;3875381']Seismic Assault.

    I've really been trying to test this deck out and it's working out a lot for me. With Chapin's Thursday preview of the deck (the most recent) I changed the mana base around to remove those pesky Cascade Bluffs and disliked the 3 Pyroclasms, removing them for 2 more Jund Charms and a Runed Halo. I added another Runed Halo to the sideboard for the other Jund Charm slot left open, I feel that these fixes will help deal with Anathemancer while dealing with B/W Tokens as well.


    Are you leaving in the wrath of god, or switching them for hallowed burial?

    How are you sideboarding against b/w tokens?

    How are you planning to deal with the mirror?
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Chapin's Bloodbraided Elf Deck
    Quote from TheSIN
    I wouldn't have Pithing Needle in the sideboard in the first place. You don't have to follow Chapin's list to the exact, 75 card tee.


    1. I'm not as smart as Chapin and his crew.
    2. I would like to understand the original intention before I go about willy nilly changing things.

    Chapin and his crew are a smart bunch. I am guessing they considered many of the changes I would make (hallowed burial for wrath of god, at least 2 fallout in the board *faeries is not as dead as people think*)
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • posted a message on Chapin's Bloodbraided Elf Deck
    Quote from TheSIN
    I'd do something like

    -4 Bituminous Blast
    +2 Cloudthresher
    +1 Jund Charm
    +1 Pithing Needle


    Pithing Needle gets their Windbrisk Heights, Mutavaults, Burrenton Forge Tenders (Post Board), Ajani Goldmane, Cloadgoat Ranger (I guess).


    Why run Blast main at all if its going to be sideboarded out against bw tokens? Is it THAT good against the other matchups?

    If you don't want 2 pithing needle in this matchup, which matchup do you want 2 against?
    Posted in: Standard Archives
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.