Its a risk your going to have to take playing any significant threats. But when it gets through, if your still playing spells, it can be a 7/7 or up every turn, just one turn after playing it. Or if they foolishly let it sit for a turn, Thrasher + Loxodon Warhammer = win, period. What happens with your dryad when your in topdeck mode (which you will be sometimes, I dont care how much card draw you have) and drawing lands, even if not then its still only a +1/+1 every turn maybe. If you need to, to get those last points of damage through when you can, you can also just take some mana burn at the end of their turn to win on yours.
Its also not the weaksauce when you play it, becoming a 4/4 the next turn, Dryad sits pretty small for a couple of turns, even if you do land it turn 2.
My Dryads were not really small for the first couple of turns in fact it was a 6/6 on turn three most of the time, it just required playing spells that were two or more colors, such as one of the new charms because each source of color in the spell adds a +1/+1 counter to it. I mean wake Thrasher is still a significant threat, and I think that both in the same deck might be a viable option.
I'm sorry, but youve been playing it wrong. Here, try reading it again; Quirion Dryad. It doesnt care how many colors it has, just that it has colors. It doesnt say, "Whenever you play a blue, black, white, or red spell, put a +1/+1 counter on Quirion Dryad for each color in that card's converted mana cost". It just says to put one counter on when the spell is played.
My Dryads were not really small for the first couple of turns in fact it was a 6/6 on turn three most of the time, it just required playing spells that were two or more colors, such as one of the new charms because each source of color in the spell adds a +1/+1 counter to it. I mean wake Thrasher is still a significant threat, and I think that both in the same deck might be a viable option.
Yah... playing it wrong. Way out to lunch on that one.
Google the word: Spellcheck. Since you spelled sarcasm wrong :).
lol did you google the word sarcasim because the first thing that comes up is the urban dictionary version which says
"Latin. From the root word "sarcasm" but with an extra "i".
You are a ****ing idiot for correcting my spelling. You should go to hell and die. And then lick my nuts. NOSH."
im not being ignorant that is a quote. it is funny that you corrected my spelling though. but realy google it
Added quotations so people don't freak on you. Also, this post is spam. I'm giving you a warning for spamming and feeding the troll. His post was rude, but he didn't cross any line nor did he spam. Please refrain from doing this in the future.
My Dryads were not really small for the first couple of turns in fact it was a 6/6 on turn three most of the time, it just required playing spells that were two or more colors, such as one of the new charms because each source of color in the spell adds a +1/+1 counter to it. I mean wake Thrasher is still a significant threat, and I think that both in the same deck might be a viable option.
Yah... playing it wrong. Way out to lunch on that one.
I have never heard of a Quick n' toast other that a 5 colour control deck.
*googleing*
EDIT: According to google the deck is now much more popular than the sandwich
Draft it on Cubetutor!
lol did you google the word sarcasim because the first thing that comes up is the urban dictionary version which says
"Latin. From the root word "sarcasm" but with an extra "i".
You are a ****ing idiot for correcting my spelling. You should go to hell and die. And then lick my nuts. NOSH."
im not being ignorant that is a quote. it is funny that you corrected my spelling though. but realy google it
Added quotations so people don't freak on you. Also, this post is spam. I'm giving you a warning for spamming and feeding the troll. His post was rude, but he didn't cross any line nor did he spam. Please refrain from doing this in the future.
-Shin