i dont eather. the reason why is cause "oh its cause she has protection from black" which was dumb. if someone else could give me more opinions. i would love it.
Protection does not suddenly make the creature perfectly immortal to that color. Otherwise, Edict effect couldn't hit prot.black cards and Knight of Infamy would be immune to SV and terminus.
Unless a card SPECIFICALLY says TARGET or deals DAMAGE, protection does nothing.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
This aint your girlfriends meta! This is a man's meta! TURBO META.
Would Vraska the Unseen destroy Knight of Glory after Vraska had did her first loyalty ability if he had attacked and dealt damage to her?
Protection:"This creature can't be blocked, targeted, dealt damage, or enchanted by anything black."
Vraska:"+1: Until your next turn, whenever a creature deals combat damage to Vraska the Unseen, destroy that creature."
Side note: i called a judge, and he called a judge, and he went online and we had to go to turns and i was told no. He wouldn't be destroyed
Vraska's ability doesn't deal damage, block, target, or enchant
Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.
Protection does not suddenly make the creature perfectly immortal to that color. Otherwise, Edict effect couldn't hit prot.black cards and Knight of Infamy would be immune to SV and terminus.
Unless a card SPECIFICALLY says TARGET or deals DAMAGE, protection does nothing.
This aint your girlfriends meta! This is a man's meta! TURBO META.
Sounds like some crappy judges.