@artificer andy: i think if you arrange to play like phyrexian dreadnaught or somebody before round two its not a problem.
anyways, slip, i won against Daxon 2-0. also, you will provide decklists to everyone in like some thread after the tourney, no? also, looks like xenoninja's group is the last one. they need some motivation... LOL
I can't wait for the next tournament. I definitely need to work on my Jund deck, finalise it (right now I've got like three decklists that all have potential).
In any case, I can't wait to see the decklist(s) at the end of the tournament. Should be fun.
first and foremost, contact slipknot, the creator of the thread and tourney. i'd suggest by PM. then ask if that other guy is still up for it. it might not work out, but if you figure its worth a try, go for it.
Ok, made contact. We are playing tonight @ 6pm Pacific (9pm EST), so for those of you who want to see what I'm playing - BE THERE!
i will. and i based on what you said about the 3 people that helped you build the deck.... i just might know what you are playing, unless you changed after you decided to quit and come back again.
EDIT:
@slipknot: you have one list of pairings that is too-date, and one below that is out of date. i'd remove the second.
I definitely still feel Jund is a strong choice, and i'd even take Jund in the matchup most games, but like most Jund decks, you're a victim to your draws, which can make it more inconsistent than a lot of decks. It gets even worse when you can't draw into sweepers :o.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Find me online - I'm on Cockatrice * Tag - Badd B - Or on MTGO - Tag - Cbus05
In life all we can do is try to make things better. Sitting lost in old ways and fearing change only makes us outdated and ignorant.
Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.
Albert Einstein
Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity.
ok got everything, except 1 game which is my fault.
My bad I'll message your opponent for you. Oh and I fixed it.
slip, the OP is really disorganized, no offence. it still says at the top that ninja still needs to play his match. it also has 2 parts for round 1 pairings, one that is out of date. you also haven't but the round 2 results up yet, for the 2 matches that have been played.
no offence, of course. i just think that you should make 1 spoiler for names and numbers, one for round 1 pairings and results, and 1 for round 2 pairings and results, and label all of them.
slip, the OP is really disorganized, no offence. it still says at the top that ninja still needs to play his match. it also has 2 parts for round 1 pairings, one that is out of date. you also haven't but the round 2 results up yet, for the 2 matches that have been played.
no offence, of course. i just think that you should make 1 spoiler for names and numbers, one for round 1 pairings and results, and 1 for round 2 pairings and results, and label all of them.
just nit-picks. i know you are busy.
updated op check it out. also had to make a losers bracket so someone didn't get a bye into the finals.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
In life all we can do is try to make things better. Sitting lost in old ways and fearing change only makes us outdated and ignorant.
Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.
Albert Einstein
Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity.
Nitpicks:
Round 1 was won by dav/flamerock so you can make that clear in round 2 pairs
I won round 2 and went 2-1, so you can update that
SHFFR34 also won round 2 and went 2-0
Even though it is the losers bracket, its technically round 2 not 1 for them
Round 2 doesn't have numbers by the names so it makes round 3 look confusing
Nitpicks:
Round 1 was won by dav/flamerock so you can make that clear in round 2 pairs.
Very sleepy when I did that lol. Fixed
I won round 2 and went 2-1, so you can update that
SHFFR34 also won round 2 and went 2-0
ADDED
Even though it is the losers bracket, its technically round 2 not 1 for them
Ok, why not lol.
Round 2 doesn't have numbers by the names so it makes round 3 look confusing
Thats not for y'all that's for me. It it meant to be "coded".
Keep up the good work!
No prob
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
In life all we can do is try to make things better. Sitting lost in old ways and fearing change only makes us outdated and ignorant.
Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.
Albert Einstein
Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity.
why do 2 people get to go into round 3 of the LB without having to play in round 2? if they simply got in to it by losing round 2 of the WB rather than round 1, you might want to wait until the other people finish round 2 of the WB until you make pairings for round 3 of the LB because other people who lose round 2 of the WB should be in it as well, to keep it even.
Edit: Oh, hey, Modern is a format.
I will never, ever forget that Ghost Quarter lets me search for a land. Ever again. /facepalm
My Pauper Cube ♤ The Pauper Cube Thread Common Knowledge — 1 2
anyways, slip, i won against Daxon 2-0. also, you will provide decklists to everyone in like some thread after the tourney, no? also, looks like xenoninja's group is the last one. they need some motivation... LOL
I messaged my opponent, we agreed on a time but not a day. Waiting for him to respond or something :L
Heroes of the Plane
The Price of Legacy
The Price of Legacy 2.0!
Decks:
EDH
Malestrom Wanderer Group Chaotic Hugs
Tasigur, The Golden Fang Valu-Town
Modern
Too many to List...
Legacy
GWBNic-Fit PodGWB
G12-Post (Building)G
In any case, I can't wait to see the decklist(s) at the end of the tournament. Should be fun.
My Pauper Cube ♤ The Pauper Cube Thread Common Knowledge — 1 2
How would I do this?
first and foremost, contact slipknot, the creator of the thread and tourney. i'd suggest by PM. then ask if that other guy is still up for it. it might not work out, but if you figure its worth a try, go for it.
Heroes of the Plane
The Price of Legacy
The Price of Legacy 2.0!
Decks:
EDH
Malestrom Wanderer Group Chaotic Hugs
Tasigur, The Golden Fang Valu-Town
Modern
Too many to List...
Legacy
GWBNic-Fit PodGWB
G12-Post (Building)G
i will. and i based on what you said about the 3 people that helped you build the deck.... i just might know what you are playing, unless you changed after you decided to quit and come back again.
EDIT:
@slipknot: you have one list of pairings that is too-date, and one below that is out of date. i'd remove the second.
Dav wins 2-0.
180 Winston Dueling Cube!
Antiquities War-themed Artifact Cube!
Heroes of the Plane
The Price of Legacy
The Price of Legacy 2.0!
Decks:
EDH
Malestrom Wanderer Group Chaotic Hugs
Tasigur, The Golden Fang Valu-Town
Modern
Too many to List...
Legacy
GWBNic-Fit PodGWB
G12-Post (Building)G
i won't be available until monday, so i guess it was a good thing we got it over with early.
also, just a suggestion: the final round should be best out of 5 instead of 3. just like the top 8 of a pro tour / grand prix.
Props to SHFFR, he had a good deck.
I definitely still feel Jund is a strong choice, and i'd even take Jund in the matchup most games, but like most Jund decks, you're a victim to your draws, which can make it more inconsistent than a lot of decks. It gets even worse when you can't draw into sweepers :o.
My bad I'll message your opponent for you. Oh and I fixed it.
Albert Einstein
Thomas Jefferson
slip, the OP is really disorganized, no offence. it still says at the top that ninja still needs to play his match. it also has 2 parts for round 1 pairings, one that is out of date. you also haven't but the round 2 results up yet, for the 2 matches that have been played.
no offence, of course. i just think that you should make 1 spoiler for names and numbers, one for round 1 pairings and results, and 1 for round 2 pairings and results, and label all of them.
just nit-picks. i know you are busy.
updated op check it out. also had to make a losers bracket so someone didn't get a bye into the finals.
Albert Einstein
Thomas Jefferson
Nitpicks:
Round 1 was won by dav/flamerock so you can make that clear in round 2 pairs
I won round 2 and went 2-1, so you can update that
SHFFR34 also won round 2 and went 2-0
Even though it is the losers bracket, its technically round 2 not 1 for them
Round 2 doesn't have numbers by the names so it makes round 3 look confusing
Keep up the good work!
No prob
Albert Einstein
Thomas Jefferson
hope that all made sense... ;P