I really like Ktkenshinx's proposed card (costing 1G though) and I doubt it will be anywhere near dominant as a maindeck card in modern. It's still terrible in multiples and your landbase will obviously be super wonky when you don't happen to draw it. And then there's the fact that there are still enough decks in modern that say 'yes, please' when you spend you turn two dropping a do nothing card on them (Burn, Storm, Dredge, Living End, Ad Nauseam...).
As somebody pointed out, very sweet design as it has kind of a learning curve for beginners and would easily be printable in Standard.
Wizards please see this!
An interesting way to hate on big mana decks might be Encroach. It pained me that more often then not you never could nab the cards that mattered, i.e. lands.
As a reprint it wouldn't be format warping in a way another moon variant might be and on the plus side it would help the kind of decks that need the help against big mana.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
In my dream, the world had suffered a terrible disaster. A black haze shut out the sun, and the darkness was alive with the moans and screams of wounded people. Suddenly, a small light glowed. A candle flickered into life, symbol of hope for millions. A single tiny candle, shining in the ugly dark. I laughed and blew it out.
Many thanks to HotP Studios. Special thanks to DNC for this great sig.
I'm a big mana player so I'v got to admit that the idea of having an opponent go "Encroach, Surgical Extraction, have a nice day" is rather offputting for me, but I don't think it'd be terrible for Modern... I do think it'd be unlikely that WotC would print a card that lets you take a land from hand, though. Offputting for a lot of people.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Well, I can saw a woman in two, but you won't wanna look in the box when I'm through.
I really like Ktkenshinx's proposed card (costing 1G though) and I doubt it will be anywhere near dominant as a maindeck card in modern. It's still terrible in multiples and your landbase will obviously be super wonky when you don't happen to draw it. And then there's the fact that there are still enough decks in modern that say 'yes, please' when you spend you turn two dropping a do nothing card on them (Burn, Storm, Dredge, Living End, Ad Nauseam...).
As somebody pointed out, very sweet design as it has kind of a learning curve for beginners and would easily be printable in Standard.
Wizards please see this!
Those decks don't care but will they when the deck gets to play every best sb card because it'll support a 5 color sb? You'd have 0 idea what your opponent is bringing in and to get the sb color you need in a green deck isn't too hard. Will the card also effect lands in hand/gy? Cycling, transmute, dredge, entering tapped...
Why are we even worrying about Tron right now? There is no such thing as a dominant deck or dominant strategy in Modern right now. It's all based on familiarity with whatever your playing with and playing against. Everything's on the player now, not the deck.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
WoTC, thank you for finally announcing the Modern format, an eternal format where everyone can participate.
You may be right, but the known facts about deck presentation would suggest we aren't there yet.
They could ban it now to avoid accusations of a shake-up ban right before the PT, but then it will surely be perceived as arbitrary and the community's trust in the list's management will suffer. Goes to show that they really should have axed both lands when they had the chance.
Reasoning here is similar to Zvi's when he commented on WotC's first decision on Felidar Guardian. Mind you these cases are very different from each other but the point is if you have a clear shot you should take it.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
In my dream, the world had suffered a terrible disaster. A black haze shut out the sun, and the darkness was alive with the moans and screams of wounded people. Suddenly, a small light glowed. A candle flickered into life, symbol of hope for millions. A single tiny candle, shining in the ugly dark. I laughed and blew it out.
Many thanks to HotP Studios. Special thanks to DNC for this great sig.
Everyone talking about big mana decks. I'm a Jund player who has switched to Junk and BW tokens, but I've also built GW hatebears, RW Blood Moon, and BG 8rack to hate on big mama decks.
I would like access to better land hate in modern. Maybe something as simple as a utter end or anguished unmaking that can also hit lands. However, modern does have access to:
I know acidic slime cost 5 mana, but Kiki-Jiki chord can cast it as early as turn 3, and then flash it back on turn 4 with resto angel.
I also think something as simple as an unban of BBE would give Jund a better matchup against big mana. BBE cascading into a Fulminator mage seems pretty good.
I'm not a big fan of big mana decks because I prefer to play grindy, interactive decks that play the long game, which typically lose to big mana, but it's understandable that each deck type has a bad matchup.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Modern
JundBGR
RW Blood MoonRW
Pauper
Delver U
Elves G
Control B
Commander
Edgar Markov BRW
Captain Sisay GW
Niv-Mizzet, Parun UR
Tymna and Ravos WB
Why are we even worrying about Tron right now? There is no such thing as a dominant deck or dominant strategy in Modern right now. It's all based on familiarity with whatever your playing with and playing against. Everything's on the player now, not the deck.
I think Ktkenshinx (once again) put it right. Given the current situation and seeing the results of the Grand Prix weekend, there's no reason to worry or talk about a banning on 'big mana decks' right now. However that should not hold us back from discussing potential safety valves to be able to take care of problematic lands. An area modern's vast card pool is comparatively bad at. The target is to prevent bannings further down the line.
I really like Ktkenshinx's proposed card (costing 1G though) and I doubt it will be anywhere near dominant as a maindeck card in modern. It's still terrible in multiples and your landbase will obviously be super wonky when you don't happen to draw it. And then there's the fact that there are still enough decks in modern that say 'yes, please' when you spend you turn two dropping a do nothing card on them (Burn, Storm, Dredge, Living End, Ad Nauseam...).
As somebody pointed out, very sweet design as it has kind of a learning curve for beginners and would easily be printable in Standard.
Wizards please see this!
Those decks don't care but will they when the deck gets to play every best sb card because it'll support a 5 color sb? You'd have 0 idea what your opponent is bringing in and to get the sb color you need in a green deck isn't too hard. Will the card also effect lands in hand/gy? Cycling, transmute, dredge, entering tapped...
As Blood Moon does only affect lands in play, I would guess that would apply to Prismatic Moon as well. So you can still cycle your lands, dredge em, morph em, transmute em etc.
And to your first point, I really don't see the big problem here.
You don't always play against tiered strategies with commonly known SB choices.
Dredge will bring in cards to hate on permanent based gravehate (I'm no Dredge player, but I'm pretty sure they do that against every deck they don't need to race anyway).
Ad Nauseam and Storm will bring in Echoing Truth which catches pretty much every hard hate card anyway...
And if you where totally wrong with your SB choices game 2, chances are good there's a game 3 where you have another try to SB correctly.
Even with Prismatic Moon, a 5 colour landbase comes at a price. You need to decide which colours you want as your core and which you want to splash, because there will be a significant amount of games where you don't happen to draw PM in the top 10 cards of your library...
Have you seen how carefully crafted landbases of 5 colour Scapeshift or Domain Zoo are? Or Countercat (which is only 4 colours)?
Heck even Jund Shadow wasn't sure if the lists splashing a 4th colour where better than normal Jund or not. And that deck negates the downside of both fetches and shocks, giving the deck a manabase that's arguably better than Legacy's without Wasteland to keep it in check. I don't see Grixis Shadow splashing for Stony Silence of Ancient Grudge either...
Why are we even worrying about Tron right now? There is no such thing as a dominant deck or dominant strategy in Modern right now. It's all based on familiarity with whatever your playing with and playing against. Everything's on the player now, not the deck.
I think Ktkenshinx (once again) put it right. Given the current situation and seeing the results of the Grand Prix weekend, there's no reason to worry or talk about a banning on 'big mana decks' right now. However that should not hold us back from discussing potential safety valves to be able to take care of problematic lands. An area modern's vast card pool is comparatively bad at. The target is to prevent bannings further down the line.
I really like Ktkenshinx's proposed card (costing 1G though) and I doubt it will be anywhere near dominant as a maindeck card in modern. It's still terrible in multiples and your landbase will obviously be super wonky when you don't happen to draw it. And then there's the fact that there are still enough decks in modern that say 'yes, please' when you spend you turn two dropping a do nothing card on them (Burn, Storm, Dredge, Living End, Ad Nauseam...).
As somebody pointed out, very sweet design as it has kind of a learning curve for beginners and would easily be printable in Standard.
Wizards please see this!
Those decks don't care but will they when the deck gets to play every best sb card because it'll support a 5 color sb? You'd have 0 idea what your opponent is bringing in and to get the sb color you need in a green deck isn't too hard. Will the card also effect lands in hand/gy? Cycling, transmute, dredge, entering tapped...
As Blood Moon does only affect lands in play, I would guess that would apply to Prismatic Moon as well. So you can still cycle your lands, dredge em, morph em, transmute em etc.
And to your first point, I really don't see the big problem here.
You don't always play against tiered strategies with commonly known SB choices.
Dredge will bring in cards to hate on permanent based gravehate (I'm no Dredge player, but I'm pretty sure they do that against every deck they don't need to race anyway).
Ad Nauseam and Storm will bring in Echoing Truth which catches pretty much every hard hate card anyway...
And if you where totally wrong with your SB choices game 2, chances are good there's a game 3 where you have another try to SB correctly.
Even with Prismatic Moon, a 5 colour landbase comes at a price. You need to decide which colours you want as your core and which you want to splash, because there will be a significant amount of games where you don't happen to draw PM in the top 10 cards of your library...
Have you seen how carefully crafted landbases of 5 colour Scapeshift or Domain Zoo are? Or Countercat (which is only 4 colours)?
Heck even Jund Shadow wasn't sure if the lists splashing a 4th colour where better than normal Jund or not. And that deck negates the downside of both fetches and shocks, giving the deck a manabase that's arguably better than Legacy's without Wasteland to keep it in check. I don't see Grixis Shadow splashing for Stony Silence of Ancient Grudge either...
Dredge is a good example. They're now moving more towards decays and away from claims so maybe they board in decay and grudge vs your green deck. Now the (let's say green/white player sides in leyline of the void (or angers)but if it's not in their opener they can still cast it while playing no black sources. I'm not saying these are things that would surely happen but they need to be thought about when designing this supposed card.
Sorry, but the Prismatic Moon card doesn't seem like much of a hate card to me. It's a main deck staple that color fixes while also screwing a whole bunch of decks and strategies. What an incredibly boring and stupid game Magic would be if lands couldn't do anything but make mana. The only reason Blood Moon isn't busted is precisely because it limits to one color. Prismatic Moon would completely change the format for the worse.
So answer it? It's not like Blood Moon is a format defining card.
You honestly need to do some self reflection on just how biased you are on this issue.
There was some confusion about this on the last page so let's revisit.
1. No bans currently needed. All decks, notably "big mana" ones, are totally fine.
2. Just because "big mana" is currently fine, that doesn't mean we can't discuss safety valves and preventative answers to those strategies.
3. All answers should be relatively generic, i.e. many decks can play them without significant restrictions. See Stony Silence, Rest in Peace, Relic, Nihil Spellbomb, Thoughtseize/IoK, etc.
4. Answers need to get through Standard. Wasteland and FoW probably won't. Prismatic Moon could, depending on the Standard manabase.
I'd be happy if we talked about all kinds of generic answers here, not just land hate. Countermagic is another unexplored area that Modern could really benefit from. I just focus on Moon effects because the rest of the thread is, for the most part, obsessed with discussing "big mana" and I'd rather speculate about hate than speculate about bans that won't happen.
There is zero reason that card could never be printed. Some of us hate seeing cards banned, especially ones that would render a deck Tier 3 or lower.
Discussion that may see someones eyes at Wizards and MAYBE plant a seed, is about the most productive thing this thread could be doing. Unless you have found the merry-go-round of discussion on 'this deck is too strong' 'big mana hurts control' 'uw control is bad/great/bad' stimulating.
I would also like to kindly remind the thread that we do NOT have accurate and representative data about what is actually going in within the format. The small-value paper data and skewed online data paint somewhat of a picture, but who knows how correct it actually is. We have had massively diverse paper Top 8 results in the past, which did nothing to deter additional bans for other reasons. Without the true representation of the format, it's difficult to make any reasonable predictions on the actions they will take moving forward. For all we know, ETron and GDS could be nearly 20% each, but simply get hated out in tournaments by clever metagaming deck choices.
Based on our lack of information and Wizards' ban-first-ask-questions-later style of management, I still don't believe whatsoever that anything is safe in our format. This is even more threatening with the return of the Modern Pro Tour. SOMETHING will happen in January, it's just a matter of what. And it's really anybody's guess.
I would also like to kindly remind the thread that we do NOT have accurate and representative data about what is actually going in within the format. The small-value paper data and skewed online data paint somewhat of a picture, but who knows how correct it actually is. We have had massively diverse paper Top 8 results in the past, which did nothing to deter additional bans for other reasons. Without the true representation of the format, it's difficult to make any reasonable predictions on the actions they will take moving forward. For all we know, ETron and GDS could be nearly 20% each, but simply get hated out in tournaments by clever metagaming deck choices.
Based on our lack of information and Wizards' ban-first-ask-questions-later style of management, I still don't believe whatsoever that anything is safe in our format.
Current paper results are significantly more diverse now than at any previous point when a card got banned. Our paper N is about the same now as it was in the past, so judging on paper results alone, nothing is getting banned. Or, at least, it's extremely unlikely. MTGO results are another story because no one knows them, but I doubt they are too different from paper as to warrant bans. Historically, they are never more than a few percentage points off, and it's unlikely that changed now.
I agree that Wizards' ban approach to Modern has reduced confidence in format stability, but if there was ever a time to feel safe, it's now.
Regardless I still feel a bit dirty inside comboing people out with Storm. I love that deck and am incredibly biased towards it but I'm not sure that a Modern in which storm is a tier 1.x deck is a balanced format. Or am I being to paranoid?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
In my dream, the world had suffered a terrible disaster. A black haze shut out the sun, and the darkness was alive with the moans and screams of wounded people. Suddenly, a small light glowed. A candle flickered into life, symbol of hope for millions. A single tiny candle, shining in the ugly dark. I laughed and blew it out.
Many thanks to HotP Studios. Special thanks to DNC for this great sig.
Urza's Inhibitor
3 (any color)
As Urza's Inhibitor enters the battlefield, choose a creature type.
Creature spells of the chosen type cost 2 more to cast.
If the big complaint is with tribal sol lands, then answer with tribal hate. Better generic land hate is a terrible idea IMHO.
Urza's Inhibitor
3 (any color)
As Urza's Inhibitor enters the battlefield, choose a creature type.
Creature spells of the chosen type cost 2 more to cast.
If the big complaint is with tribal sol lands, then answer with tribal hate. Better generic land hate is a terrible idea IMHO.
So every other tribe has to pay 2 more to cast creatures while the only tribe in modern with access to a sol land has to pay 1 more. Right.
Guys please opinions on japanese cards. Lost a 3/3 creature against Japan celestial colonade. This guy played all creatures and spells in english cards, but some cards in his manabase was japanese. I dont registrated this really ( my brain say its all fine and all english to me lets attack his empty board)...and i am sure it is a Kind of legal cheating. It is not ok, but i know legal. I Hate such people. I never forget colonade normally, but with this Tricks it can happen one time in 3 years and such people take advantage of this
If I am a customer spending premium amount of dollars, I expect a premium service. Jund falls into the category of a premium deck costing more dollars than a majority of the rest of the format. I'm not getting the desired performance ratio per dollars spent out of the Jund deck because WOTC decided to make the format more diverse.
Urza's Inhibitor
3 (any color)
As Urza's Inhibitor enters the battlefield, choose a creature type.
Creature spells of the chosen type cost 2 more to cast.
If the big complaint is with tribal sol lands, then answer with tribal hate. Better generic land hate is a terrible idea IMHO.
So every other tribe has to pay 2 more to cast creatures while the only tribe in modern with access to a sol land has to pay 1 more. Right.
Agreed, not to mention it does nothing vs regular tron or scapeshift and at 3cmc tks probably already took it or doesn't care.
Urza's Inhibitor
3 (any color)
As Urza's Inhibitor enters the battlefield, choose a creature type.
Creature spells of the chosen type cost 2 more to cast.
If the big complaint is with tribal sol lands, then answer with tribal hate. Better generic land hate is a terrible idea IMHO.
So every other tribe has to pay 2 more to cast creatures while the only tribe in modern with access to a sol land has to pay 1 more. Right.
Agreed, not to mention it does nothing vs regular tron or scapeshift and at 3cmc tks probably already took it or doesn't care.
the card itself really isn't worth the card board its printed on...does it serve a purpose? Sure its a blue 1 drop that might not be a 1/1. I would not put it in a list and expect to win a PTQ or GP though.
I know this isn't the card creation thread but if shadow and eldrazi are really an issue what would help a lot is splashable "big creature hate"
Reprieve W
Enchantment
Creatures with power 4 or greater can't attack or block.
At the beginning of your upkeep if you control 4 or more lands sacrifice Reprieve.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
My Decks:
UG Merfolk RG 8-Whack BWG Abzan midrange GRB Living End UWB Spirit Control
GU Kruphix's "Hug Assassin" RW Kalemne's "Play Fatties and Hope for the Best!" BUGW Atraxa's "All counters, all the time"
I think there are a ton of old cards we should see. Propaganda, Meekstone, Miscalculation, Memory Lapse, Counterspell, and the list goes on. So many already printed cards that could expand options and possibly regulate the meta.
Are we theory crafting hate cards? UG
Shifting Reclamation
When ~ enters the battlefield starting with you each player names a basic land type.
Non basic lands are lands of the chosen type.
Forces greedy mana to play fair and cuts back on the current deck building strategy of just jamming all the fetches and all the shocks.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
As somebody pointed out, very sweet design as it has kind of a learning curve for beginners and would easily be printable in Standard.
Wizards please see this!
As a reprint it wouldn't be format warping in a way another moon variant might be and on the plus side it would help the kind of decks that need the help against big mana.
Many thanks to HotP Studios. Special thanks to DNC for this great sig.
Those decks don't care but will they when the deck gets to play every best sb card because it'll support a 5 color sb? You'd have 0 idea what your opponent is bringing in and to get the sb color you need in a green deck isn't too hard. Will the card also effect lands in hand/gy? Cycling, transmute, dredge, entering tapped...
They could ban it now to avoid accusations of a shake-up ban right before the PT, but then it will surely be perceived as arbitrary and the community's trust in the list's management will suffer. Goes to show that they really should have axed both lands when they had the chance.
Reasoning here is similar to Zvi's when he commented on WotC's first decision on Felidar Guardian. Mind you these cases are very different from each other but the point is if you have a clear shot you should take it.
Many thanks to HotP Studios. Special thanks to DNC for this great sig.
I would like access to better land hate in modern. Maybe something as simple as a utter end or anguished unmaking that can also hit lands. However, modern does have access to:
I know acidic slime cost 5 mana, but Kiki-Jiki chord can cast it as early as turn 3, and then flash it back on turn 4 with resto angel.
I also think something as simple as an unban of BBE would give Jund a better matchup against big mana. BBE cascading into a Fulminator mage seems pretty good.
I'm not a big fan of big mana decks because I prefer to play grindy, interactive decks that play the long game, which typically lose to big mana, but it's understandable that each deck type has a bad matchup.
JundBGR
RW Blood MoonRW
Pauper
Delver U
Elves G
Control B
Commander
Edgar Markov BRW
Captain Sisay GW
Niv-Mizzet, Parun UR
Tymna and Ravos WB
I think Ktkenshinx (once again) put it right. Given the current situation and seeing the results of the Grand Prix weekend, there's no reason to worry or talk about a banning on 'big mana decks' right now. However that should not hold us back from discussing potential safety valves to be able to take care of problematic lands. An area modern's vast card pool is comparatively bad at. The target is to prevent bannings further down the line.
As Blood Moon does only affect lands in play, I would guess that would apply to Prismatic Moon as well. So you can still cycle your lands, dredge em, morph em, transmute em etc.
And to your first point, I really don't see the big problem here.
You don't always play against tiered strategies with commonly known SB choices.
Dredge will bring in cards to hate on permanent based gravehate (I'm no Dredge player, but I'm pretty sure they do that against every deck they don't need to race anyway).
Ad Nauseam and Storm will bring in Echoing Truth which catches pretty much every hard hate card anyway...
And if you where totally wrong with your SB choices game 2, chances are good there's a game 3 where you have another try to SB correctly.
Even with Prismatic Moon, a 5 colour landbase comes at a price. You need to decide which colours you want as your core and which you want to splash, because there will be a significant amount of games where you don't happen to draw PM in the top 10 cards of your library...
Have you seen how carefully crafted landbases of 5 colour Scapeshift or Domain Zoo are? Or Countercat (which is only 4 colours)?
Heck even Jund Shadow wasn't sure if the lists splashing a 4th colour where better than normal Jund or not. And that deck negates the downside of both fetches and shocks, giving the deck a manabase that's arguably better than Legacy's without Wasteland to keep it in check. I don't see Grixis Shadow splashing for Stony Silence of Ancient Grudge either...
Dredge is a good example. They're now moving more towards decays and away from claims so maybe they board in decay and grudge vs your green deck. Now the (let's say green/white player sides in leyline of the void (or angers)but if it's not in their opener they can still cast it while playing no black sources. I'm not saying these are things that would surely happen but they need to be thought about when designing this supposed card.
So answer it? It's not like Blood Moon is a format defining card.
You honestly need to do some self reflection on just how biased you are on this issue.
I mean lands tapping for mana, yes how crazy...
Spirits
1. No bans currently needed. All decks, notably "big mana" ones, are totally fine.
2. Just because "big mana" is currently fine, that doesn't mean we can't discuss safety valves and preventative answers to those strategies.
3. All answers should be relatively generic, i.e. many decks can play them without significant restrictions. See Stony Silence, Rest in Peace, Relic, Nihil Spellbomb, Thoughtseize/IoK, etc.
4. Answers need to get through Standard. Wasteland and FoW probably won't. Prismatic Moon could, depending on the Standard manabase.
I'd be happy if we talked about all kinds of generic answers here, not just land hate. Countermagic is another unexplored area that Modern could really benefit from. I just focus on Moon effects because the rest of the thread is, for the most part, obsessed with discussing "big mana" and I'd rather speculate about hate than speculate about bans that won't happen.
Spirits
Discussion that may see someones eyes at Wizards and MAYBE plant a seed, is about the most productive thing this thread could be doing. Unless you have found the merry-go-round of discussion on 'this deck is too strong' 'big mana hurts control' 'uw control is bad/great/bad' stimulating.
I dont.
Spirits
Based on our lack of information and Wizards' ban-first-ask-questions-later style of management, I still don't believe whatsoever that anything is safe in our format. This is even more threatening with the return of the Modern Pro Tour. SOMETHING will happen in January, it's just a matter of what. And it's really anybody's guess.
UR ....... WUBR ........... WB ............. RGW ........ UBR ....... WUB .... BGU
Spells / Blink & Combo / Token Grind / Dino Tribal / Draw Cards / Zombies / Reanimate
Current paper results are significantly more diverse now than at any previous point when a card got banned. Our paper N is about the same now as it was in the past, so judging on paper results alone, nothing is getting banned. Or, at least, it's extremely unlikely. MTGO results are another story because no one knows them, but I doubt they are too different from paper as to warrant bans. Historically, they are never more than a few percentage points off, and it's unlikely that changed now.
I agree that Wizards' ban approach to Modern has reduced confidence in format stability, but if there was ever a time to feel safe, it's now.
Regardless I still feel a bit dirty inside comboing people out with Storm. I love that deck and am incredibly biased towards it but I'm not sure that a Modern in which storm is a tier 1.x deck is a balanced format. Or am I being to paranoid?
Many thanks to HotP Studios. Special thanks to DNC for this great sig.
Urza's Inhibitor
3 (any color)
As Urza's Inhibitor enters the battlefield, choose a creature type.
Creature spells of the chosen type cost 2 more to cast.
If the big complaint is with tribal sol lands, then answer with tribal hate. Better generic land hate is a terrible idea IMHO.
So every other tribe has to pay 2 more to cast creatures while the only tribe in modern with access to a sol land has to pay 1 more. Right.
Agreed, not to mention it does nothing vs regular tron or scapeshift and at 3cmc tks probably already took it or doesn't care.
Oh and Eldrazi temple.
Scapeshift too.
Ban those two things I don't like and that one thing I can't beat. K thx.
Counter-Cat
Colorless Eldrazi Stompy
Reprieve W
Enchantment
Creatures with power 4 or greater can't attack or block.
At the beginning of your upkeep if you control 4 or more lands sacrifice Reprieve.
RG 8-Whack
BWG Abzan midrange
GRB Living End
UWB Spirit Control
GU Kruphix's "Hug Assassin"
RW Kalemne's "Play Fatties and Hope for the Best!"
BUGW Atraxa's "All counters, all the time"
UW Ephara Hatebears [Primer], GB Gitrog Lands, BRU Inalla Combo-Control, URG Maelstrom Wanderer Landfall
So not only do we need more/better land hate, but it has to have 0 cost?
UG
Shifting Reclamation
When ~ enters the battlefield starting with you each player names a basic land type.
Non basic lands are lands of the chosen type.
Forces greedy mana to play fair and cuts back on the current deck building strategy of just jamming all the fetches and all the shocks.