the combo is straight forward using azusa and exploration is a partial combo with the main combo to abuse them.....the actual combo is strip mine crucible and limited resources saccing strip mine to replace one of their's after lock is made (having 10 lands in play to their 0) just attack with man lands/hierarch priviledge i added as a deck filler to protect the combo, since this is a casual deck i will probably modify it to fit better cards then what i have
fast bond - i chose exploration over fast bond because usually you won't need but a few lands to get started and the fact that i'd rather have exploration for value reasons and if i decide to build 43 land i'll already have them also i don't like the pay 1 life drawback
eternal witness - i was thinking about adding her but decided against it for position which i will test and modify soon if i think it'd fit better
any comments or help with this deck would be great
Why do some people simply not understand the easy way of deck-tags?
Is completely wrong - the first character in each line is not a number, and there are other tags inside of the deck-tag. Please learn those simple rules for tagging.
- Craven
4 savannah
4 temple garden
4 windswept heath
//man land
4 mishra's factory
4 treetop village
4 stripmine
4 crucible of worlds
4 limited resources
//acceleration
4 birds of paradise
4 exploration
4 sylvan scrying
4 azusa, lost but seeking
4 wrath of god
//creatures
4 loxodon hierarch
//protection
4 priviledge position
the combo is straight forward using azusa and exploration is a partial combo with the main combo to abuse them.....the actual combo is strip mine crucible and limited resources saccing strip mine to replace one of their's after lock is made (having 10 lands in play to their 0) just attack with man lands/hierarch priviledge i added as a deck filler to protect the combo, since this is a casual deck i will probably modify it to fit better cards then what i have
fast bond - i chose exploration over fast bond because usually you won't need but a few lands to get started and the fact that i'd rather have exploration for value reasons and if i decide to build 43 land i'll already have them also i don't like the pay 1 life drawback
eternal witness - i was thinking about adding her but decided against it for position which i will test and modify soon if i think it'd fit better
any comments or help with this deck would be great
Why do some people simply not understand the easy way of deck-tags?
[DECK]land x4 [CARD]savannah[/CARD] x4 [CARD]temple garden[/CARD] x4 [CARD]windswept heath[/CARD][/DECK]
Is completely wrong - the first character in each line is not a number, and there are other tags inside of the deck-tag. Please learn those simple rules for tagging.
- Craven
creatures
4 birds of paradise
other spells
4 exploration