I read the words, not the brain. There's a reason I said it was 'off', and now it's clear it was the language that was off, not the intention.
And nah, that's not really weird--this is the internet, tone is tough to figure out sometimes, and by italicizing or underlying or by putting in parentheses you make it clear that you're not using the word 'any' in the same way that the OP was. The english language is complicated, and it's reasons like this where the tone of voice that you meant would be more telling than just saying 'Slagstorm isn't an effect any red decks wants', like yeah I clearly get what you mean now, but I don't think it's crazy to see how there could be confusion there, especially as Im not the only user to be confused here dawg.
It's similar to helping your uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse; both could be intending to refer to Uncle Jack getting off a horse, but only one is saying that without confusion.
The point of this thread is less 'make expensive cards cheap' and more 'these rares would play well in a peasant environment without warping the format'
Presumably Leelue meant that not EVERY red deck wants Slagstorm.
Maybe, but he said any lol
Because Slap phillips said "Slagstorm especially because it's the kind of effect any red deck wants."
So I was just reusing the words
He clearly meant that the lava spike mode + the sweeper mode made the card good for either a fast or slow deck.
If someone thought that I literally don't think there's a red deck that wants a 3 damage sweeper, they're not thinking critically.
Yeah, it's just that semantics are weird lol I get your point, but it's tough to know that when you go the polar opposite of 'this goes in any deck' in language, you know what I'm saying? I mean, re-read what you said, it's easy to get confused there, it has nothing to do with critically thinking homie
Yeah, board wipes are def powerful in peasant, I've always liked the control decks that play red for Pyroclasm and such. I would be happy with another one, as Im not a huge fan of having a second 2-damage wrath in red. Flame Wave is cool, but I'd rather something much cheaper. Saying no red deck wants that is kinda off IMO, as red is definitely capable of playing control.
I have some good news for you
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic
And nah, that's not really weird--this is the internet, tone is tough to figure out sometimes, and by italicizing or underlying or by putting in parentheses you make it clear that you're not using the word 'any' in the same way that the OP was. The english language is complicated, and it's reasons like this where the tone of voice that you meant would be more telling than just saying 'Slagstorm isn't an effect any red decks wants', like yeah I clearly get what you mean now, but I don't think it's crazy to see how there could be confusion there, especially as Im not the only user to be confused here dawg.
It's similar to helping your uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse; both could be intending to refer to Uncle Jack getting off a horse, but only one is saying that without confusion.
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic
The point of this thread is less 'make expensive cards cheap' and more 'these rares would play well in a peasant environment without warping the format'
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic
Yeah, it's just that semantics are weird lol I get your point, but it's tough to know that when you go the polar opposite of 'this goes in any deck' in language, you know what I'm saying? I mean, re-read what you said, it's easy to get confused there, it has nothing to do with critically thinking homie
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic
Maybe, but he said any lol
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic
I get your point and agree, but TBF: nothing says 'uncommon' like 'pay 1, sac your X/1, draw 2 cards'
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic
Also, follow us on twitter! @TurnOneMagic